Jon Stewart Rips Congress During House Hearing on 9/11 Victims Fund, Gets Standing Ovation

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Space_Time, Jun 11, 2019.

  1. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    22,802
    Likes Received:
    11,809
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Do you understand the connotation and denotation of the term "ground zero"? I didn't begin using it to describe the location, but somebody in the mainstream media and its confidants did, years ago.

    Matthew Tartaglia, a fireman sent there from Pennsylvania, described nuclear decontamination protocol in place. A few years later his teeth began falling out, and I think 5 years later he died from the effects of radiation poisoning.

    The air was full of microspheres of iron, caused only by iron hot enough to boil. There are many facts that support the idea that nuclear events took place there that day.
     
  2. BuckyBadger

    BuckyBadger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2018
    Messages:
    12,354
    Likes Received:
    11,778
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That is not radioactive. Learn the difference so you stop making such foolish statements.
     
    Cubed likes this.
  3. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    41,176
    Likes Received:
    4,365
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    If what hasn't happened?
     
  4. Curious Always

    Curious Always Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2016
    Messages:
    16,925
    Likes Received:
    13,463
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    And the next two are team R and the next one is team D and the next two are team R and the next three are team D.

    Not sure about your point. Every single creature in Congress is a whore for big biz.
     
  5. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    41,176
    Likes Received:
    4,365
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Wasn't there something different about this time to the last time that it was passed? I read something about the fund not having enough funds anymore. Logically, in Jon's mind there was a risk of something not going the right way. Otherwise why would he have gone to this effort? I don't accept that he fake cried just for "good press."
     
    Last edited: Jun 26, 2019
  6. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    41,176
    Likes Received:
    4,365
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Well of course not. It's just that from what I read, there was something different this time around to the last time. Otherwise, why the hell did Jon bother? Why would he do it if he had every reason to believe that it would be reauthorised?
     
    Last edited: Jun 26, 2019

Share This Page