Miami Officer Acquitted

Discussion in 'Law & Justice' started by Raffishragabash, Jun 21, 2019.

  1. Raffishragabash

    Raffishragabash Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2018
    Messages:
    2,977
    Likes Received:
    356
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Remember racism's cop that shot an UNARMED Black man who was caring for an autistic client? When the client, had ran away from the care facility?

    Acquitted.


    This is sickening, and this is not Justice.
     
    Last edited: Jun 21, 2019
    BillRM likes this.
  2. Imnotreallyhere

    Imnotreallyhere Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2014
    Messages:
    2,881
    Likes Received:
    1,396
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Do you think he should have hesitated and let someone die? Would you not have held him racist for that as well? Won't you admit that honest mistakes are possible? Can't you admit that a man must be proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt before he is convicted? You seem to have jumped to many conclusions based on thin evidence.
     
  3. Raffishragabash

    Raffishragabash Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2018
    Messages:
    2,977
    Likes Received:
    356
    Trophy Points:
    83

    Yes sir, I think he should have hesitated/made sure he saw a gun. Someone was shot and almost died, because of his overzealous recklessness.
     
    BillRM likes this.
  4. Raffishragabash

    Raffishragabash Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2018
    Messages:
    2,977
    Likes Received:
    356
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Yes. And that brings us to what is, now the most disturbing part of this ordeal.

    It is no longer racism's, cop, because it is 'the court' which acquitted him. After we just learned that the court knew the officer 1)was told the Black man has a toy truck in his hand then he 2)disregarded that fact, in order to shoot a Black man. This court is the cornerstone of the Racism and Black people should file a complaint with that state's Supreme Court.

    This racist court is reminiscent of the Sanford Police Dept (state of FL of course!) told Zimmerman to not go after Trayvon. Zimmy disobeyed them/said screw what a police dept rep says, but then, Zimmy did not have that used to convict him.
     
    Last edited: Jun 26, 2019
  5. Imnotreallyhere

    Imnotreallyhere Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2014
    Messages:
    2,881
    Likes Received:
    1,396
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    It is only a court which could acquit him. Where were you during civics classes?

    The court was also told the cop was not aiming at the Black man. He missed.

    One does not file a complaint to the supreme court of any state. One files a complaint in district court which may make it to the supreme court. Again, where were you during civics class? Why do you claim to be a scholar when there are such basic gaps in your knowledge?
     
  6. Raffishragabash

    Raffishragabash Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2018
    Messages:
    2,977
    Likes Received:
    356
    Trophy Points:
    83
    You should have gained some reading comprehension skills, that you needed for every class.

    I was contrasting 'the cop vs the court' only in terms of gauging which force is most-egregious here.

    The basics gaps in your, knowledge, leave you ignorant to the fact that every state in this Union ensure a citizenry right to file Judicial Misconduct complaints ---which get viewed immediately by judges of that state's Supreme Court. In real time. As in, at the moment you witness the juristical flagrancy, you can file a complaint with that states' Supreme Court. I have instructed many, many Black citizens in many states to do it, for years, and it is very effective tool.

    Although, racism's civic class will not teach this. Which makes it reasonable that you are ignorant to this American Jurisprudence fact.

    Moreover, I recently showed Black pro se litigants how to get the racist 'judge' to respect their right to due process, in their states. Here are links they used, to successfully secure that right:

    https://floridajqc.com/complaint-form/

    https://supremecourt.nebraska.gov/a...discipline-ethics/how-file-judicial-complaint

    :)
     
    Last edited: Jun 27, 2019
  7. Imnotreallyhere

    Imnotreallyhere Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2014
    Messages:
    2,881
    Likes Received:
    1,396
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Actually, you complaining that the whole system was corrupt.When in fact neither was. Good try though.





    The right to file does not give the right to file to the Supreme court.

    You are in fact the ignorant one. You don't seem to grasp the basic fact of the matter - you could look this up - no one gets to appeal directly to the supreme court of any state. How is it that you looked up to jurisprudence sites and missed this? Are you being intellectually dishonest?

    Most of the pro se problems are due to technicalities of the law, not due process. As you would know, if you had any understanding of the law.
     
  8. Raffishragabash

    Raffishragabash Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2018
    Messages:
    2,977
    Likes Received:
    356
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Please stop being deceitful in your posts.

    My earlier post clearly stated that the court's, flagrancy, has transcended the egregiousness which we see in the cop's violent irresponsible act.

    Please, stop embarrassing yourself here. I am not talking about filing appeals on court decisions.

    lol


    I am talking about court cases, in real time, where a defendant is experiencing a racist Court disrespect/sabotage that defendant's Right to fair and equal due process ---in real time. I need to repeat that 'in real time' like, constantly, for the sake of your irresponsible lack of knowledge re: this legal right citizens have. Any citizen.

    You do not even have to be a party within a, case, just as long as you are a citizen of that state and observing the case ... you can file a complaint against the sitting judge, by which, that state's Commission* on Judicial Misconduct does immediately look into the matter. And sometimes as soon as, 3 days, will contact the trial judge about the complaint. This works great at spooking racism's Judges into ceasing their unfairness, during the trial, so to cutdown on appeals and court improprieties which cause mistrials.




    * - this body of Legal Pro's does always feature at least the Chief Justice of that state's Supreme Court, and more Supreme Ct justices too, in some states.


    And??

    Did I ever dispute this, at anytime?!!!


    lol


    All I did was layout a factual legal scenario that all 50 states provide ((which you are totally ignorant of)) for ensuring court litigants are not sabotaged [In. Real. Time!] by any racist Court within the USA.
     
    Last edited: Jun 28, 2019
  9. jay runner

    jay runner Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2017
    Messages:
    16,319
    Likes Received:
    10,027
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    From what I can gather Arnaldo Rios-Soto, the Hispanic autistic guy who was under Charles Kinsey's care, had an object in his hand which was mistaken for a gun by SWAT team member Jonathan Aledda (even though a radio message from another officer went out 30 seconds prior to the shooting that the object was not a gun). Aledda said he was trying to shoot (with a rifle) the Hispanic guy, and not the unarmed Black man, technician Charles Kinsey, who was hit in the leg (apparently with a quite serious wound). Aledda fired THREE shots in all. Aledda said he thought the Black guy was endangered by the Hispanic guy.

    It all started with a passing motorist calling in a report to 911 that a man had a gun and it looked like he was going to attempt suicide.

    Human tragedy gets worse than this, but as for a series of things going wrong one after another, it don't get much worse.

    If there is gratitude that Aledda was a poor shot that day, that don't work. If there is gratitude that two are not dead, that don't work. If the is gratitude that one man was ONLY wounded, that don't work. Nothing works for this. This story couldn't be dreamt up.

    I dunno. The jury must have heard and seen more than the public got as is always the case, and more than the media gave out or knew.
     
  10. Raffishragabash

    Raffishragabash Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2018
    Messages:
    2,977
    Likes Received:
    356
    Trophy Points:
    83

    ROFL @ the melo-dramatics

    As always ... within the peculiar institution known as, state of FL, whenever it comes to cops shooting Black males.
     
  11. BillRM

    BillRM Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2016
    Messages:
    6,792
    Likes Received:
    1,704
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    It look like the best course of action for a citizen going by such a scene is not to call the cops as the odds are at least even that doing so will result in a worse outcome then otherwise.
     
  12. Matt84

    Matt84 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2015
    Messages:
    5,896
    Likes Received:
    2,472
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Before I post anything else, do you know the entire story or are you just spouting off at the mouth?
     
  13. Imnotreallyhere

    Imnotreallyhere Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2014
    Messages:
    2,881
    Likes Received:
    1,396
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I know what Raff posted. I simply pointed out that other interpretations were possible. Do you not think so?
     
  14. Imnotreallyhere

    Imnotreallyhere Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2014
    Messages:
    2,881
    Likes Received:
    1,396
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    No. you were talking about filing directly to the supreme court. I was just pointing out how that doesn't happen.
     
    Last edited: Jun 29, 2019
  15. Raffishragabash

    Raffishragabash Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2018
    Messages:
    2,977
    Likes Received:
    356
    Trophy Points:
    83

    Nope.

    lol

    You are deadASS wrong again, as usual, since I clearly said "Commission" as in every state's Commission is overseen directly by each state's Supreme Court. Which is why every state's Chief Justice, of the state's Supreme Court, is a member of that state's Commission on Judicial Misconduct.

    So technically, these complaints are in fact filed with state's Supreme Courts. Your problem is, your pride is too hurt to concede to the facts here and accept it that those links proved me to be correct. Yes since I am referring to filing complaints with state Supreme Courts, and not filing court cases
    with state Supreme Courts.

    I hope you eventually grasp the difference.
     
    Last edited: Jun 29, 2019
  16. Imnotreallyhere

    Imnotreallyhere Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2014
    Messages:
    2,881
    Likes Received:
    1,396
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male


    Look again at your post amigo. You were clearly talking about a review by the state supreme court. Once again, caught in your own web of lies.



    So actually you don't understand what the word 'technically' means just as you don't grasp the meaning of 'harliquinade'. Technically these suits would be filed with the commission and reviewed (or not, typically not) by the state supreme court. You really don't get how the judicial system works, do you?

    [qute]Your problem is, your pride is too hurt to concede to the facts here and accept it that those links proved me to be correct. Yes since I am referring to filing complaints with state Supreme Courts, and not filing court cases
    with state Supreme Courts.[/quote]

    Once again: one does not file either complaints or cases to the supreme courts directly. They are only available after other appeals have been filed and failed. Do you rally not remember this from high school? How did you graduate? Awful thought: did you graduate? You really seem to have no idea how the gov't works or why it takes the form it does.

    I get it better than you my friend, and with better precision of thought.
     
  17. Raffishragabash

    Raffishragabash Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2018
    Messages:
    2,977
    Likes Received:
    356
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Exactly.

    A review of a complaint ---by a Commission which the judges in a state's Supreme Court do oversee and do work within. Not, a review of the case to appeal a judge's Rulings.


    Again, not file a court case. But to file a complaint, exclusively about a judge's peculiar behavior in an active court case.




    lol



    Wow. Your comprehension of law, is cullinaried for sure.


    :)

    Once again, you are stuck mining the wrong data. You are referring to an incorrect part of the process, which has nothing to do with those links I posted.

    ...


    I am done repeating this to you lol so good travels pal.
     
    Last edited: Jun 29, 2019
  18. Matt84

    Matt84 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2015
    Messages:
    5,896
    Likes Received:
    2,472
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Explain why Aleeda handcuffed the man he claimed he was trying to protect.......
     
  19. Imnotreallyhere

    Imnotreallyhere Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2014
    Messages:
    2,881
    Likes Received:
    1,396
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Do you think he shouldn't have? I think it's a good idea for the cops to cuff everybody around a shooting.
     
  20. Imnotreallyhere

    Imnotreallyhere Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2014
    Messages:
    2,881
    Likes Received:
    1,396
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male



    Complain however you want to however much you want to. Your complaint will be ignored by the supremes so long as it is not an actual case.




    Why do you not understand basic American jurisprudence?




    "Cullinaried". I do not think that word means what you think it means. Look it up.


    Once again you are barking up the wrong tree. One cannot go directly to the supreme court and expect to have an effect. You are advocating an incorrect approach to the process.

    ...


    [quoteI am done repeating this to you lol so good travels pal.[/QUOTE]

    So good you are done repeating falsehoods. Good travels yourself.
     
  21. Matt84

    Matt84 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2015
    Messages:
    5,896
    Likes Received:
    2,472
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    What? Did you not read my question?
     
  22. Imnotreallyhere

    Imnotreallyhere Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2014
    Messages:
    2,881
    Likes Received:
    1,396
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Did you not read the reply? Keeping witnesses handy would seem to be a good idea. Maybe you have some other idea.
     
  23. Matt84

    Matt84 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2015
    Messages:
    5,896
    Likes Received:
    2,472
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Let me try this again.........

    This therapist was trying to protect his patient.
    Aleeda said he was trying to protect the therapist, so why did Aleeda handcuff him and let him bleed for 20 min with no aide?
     
  24. Imnotreallyhere

    Imnotreallyhere Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2014
    Messages:
    2,881
    Likes Received:
    1,396
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    So you didn't read my reply. Go back, read it, and then we can discuss the issue like rational people.
     
  25. Matt84

    Matt84 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2015
    Messages:
    5,896
    Likes Received:
    2,472
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I read your foolish reply. Handcuff everyone around a shooting, dumbest thing I've ever heard.
     

Share This Page