While the FBI was investigating 45 Mandalay press releases were managed (squashed) by the FBI. The investigation has turned into nothing and the Mandalay massacre was out of the news in weeks. Now, Snowden, Assange and Manning hold the evidence needed against his political competition, why is he not intervening to get that evidence to prevail over competition?
I would say that its not context, but rather what is in common motivating the actions or lack of them. One is about a major crime against the people, the other is about a crime against . . . the people(?), government(?). But each has a what can be seen as a pretty compelling and serious nature, but it is also clear that reactions are not reasonably consistent with what should be, if things are as presented.
eleuthera has it right. The fact you did not know indicates how the absenc from media effects justice over years.
Point taken. Is there a link for more info? Not denying anything, just clueless, i will enter anything with an open mind. but no guarantee that I will believe anything.
Well we have two events that are pretty well documented with dozens of links. The irregularities of the Mandalay event are epic, but the potentials for the info of snow/manning/assange to take down hrc and deep state are immense. A little searching on your part will go a long way. Reconciling 45’s actions won’t happen because every part of what is seen and heard on MSM is a prepared front of falsity. The people are clearly being “managed” by the info they do or do not get.
Why is a link needed to correlate two known facts? These are common knowledge to people moderately informed. Are you trying to say I should not be presenting critical thinking without some authority approving or suggesting implication, conclusion and deduction?
