Mass Shootings -- Becoming More Common? Done mainly by Crazy People? And those Video Games?

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Doug1943, Aug 11, 2019.

  1. Doug1943

    Doug1943 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2015
    Messages:
    3,741
    Likes Received:
    1,748
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    We should always be suspicious of supposed knowledge that "Everyone knows" is true, or knowledge which is "just common sense". We need to be doubly-suspicious when the 'everyone knows' or 'common sense' is about something that conforms to our deeply-held political beliefs.

    The only way to be really rational when thinking about a subject which is about empirical facts -- as opposed to moral stances -- is to be open to -- ideally to seek out -- "disconfirming evidence". The question you should always ask about an empirical subject -- one to which there is a definite answer, such as 'true' or 'false', or a number -- is, "What evidence would make me change my mind?" Although this is easy to formulate for some things, for many issues, things are complex enough -- often involving conflicting or overlapping or unclear definitions -- so that a definite answer can't be found -- no single piece of evidence will be enough. Then you have to use your judgement to work your way through conflicting data. Since most of us don't have the time or expertise to study every subject in detail, so we have to rely on experts. If they disagree, we have to choose to follow the ones we feel are most reliable. Beware of experts whose employment situation, or political/religious views, will make it very difficult for them to reach certain conclusions.

    Anyway, here is an interesting study on mass shootings: have they become more frequent?
    Are they mainly committed by people who would otherwise be classified as mentally ill? By white supremacists? Are violent video games a contributing factor?

    It's from one of my favorite websites, Intellectual Takeout, to which you can subscribe for free. Because some conclusions are congruent to my own view of the world, and others are not, I'm going to reserve judgement -- and perhaps do some more web-searching -- before I simply endorse this man's conclusions. But they were so interesting that I thought people on this forum would like to read them. And perhaps learn about this website. So here they are:

     
    Last edited: Aug 11, 2019
  2. MelKor

    MelKor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2019
    Messages:
    1,154
    Likes Received:
    344
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    The Mass Shootings are the result of angry men (mostly white) easily obtaining weapons of war due to America's lax so-called gun laws///Now you know
     
    Gary/Dubya, Thingamabob and Bowerbird like this.
  3. guavaball

    guavaball Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2016
    Messages:
    12,203
    Likes Received:
    8,501
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Of course. Racist liberals love to blame whitey for all mass shootings. Many here have done it over and over again. Especially and magically the recently joined.

    See racism can be condemned when its white on another race but racism against whites cannot be condemned by the same people. Nor can far left extremists like the Ohio shooter. No one dared blame Warren for her words that triggered this evil kid to shoot up people. Only white men like Trump can be the cause of shootings.

    Its a sick but ugly reality in the world of the left today that only one kind of racism should be condemned.

    Even blacks killing blacks should be ignored because it has nothing to do with whites so black communities are left to be run by the same anti white racists who have been doing so for years and any time the high crime is pointed out, its somehow whitey's fault.

    Even in the dictionary there is no definition for an Hispanic Nationalist or Asian nationalist which should tell you something about the dishonesty and racism in our society today pretending only certain forms of racism exist and to ignore the others.
     
    Mrlucky, Steve N and Dispondent like this.
  4. guavaball

    guavaball Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2016
    Messages:
    12,203
    Likes Received:
    8,501
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Do you think repeating the same fake statement will ever make it true?

    You've already been owned by the facts.

    51% OF MASS SHOOTERS IN 2019 WERE BLACK: ONLY 29% WERE WHITE

    https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/27...019-were-black-only-29-were-daniel-greenfield
     
    Last edited: Aug 11, 2019
  5. Doug1943

    Doug1943 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2015
    Messages:
    3,741
    Likes Received:
    1,748
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The first post in response, not unexpectedly, given the source, perfectly illustrates the problem of knowing something without actually knowing anything.
    "Of course the earth is flat ... any fool can see that ... and everyone knows it."

    Note for those who actually want to read the post, which contains some useful information: the graphs are too small to read as posted, but you just have to click on them to get them enlarged to viewable size.
     
    Last edited: Aug 11, 2019
    Polydectes likes this.
  6. kvmj

    kvmj Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2009
    Messages:
    1,987
    Likes Received:
    136
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Sometimes, mental illness is definitely the cause. Holmes comes to mind (the Aurora shooter). Quite a few are clinically depressed and determined to take out as many people as possible with them when they check out.
     
  7. Zorro

    Zorro Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    77,059
    Likes Received:
    51,759
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Of the young white men, it's starting to look like the common denominator is heavy pot use.
     
  8. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    92,576
    Likes Received:
    74,035
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    So after all the blather about “evidence” you offer an OP Ed piece from a blog. And you do not even provide a link to the original article, which seems quoted in full, read the rules of the forum, naughty!

    Why not read a solidly researched source?

    https://www.fbi.gov/about/partnerships/office-of-partner-engagement/active-shooter-resources

    The FBI.

    THEY away “active shooter” incidents ARE increasing in the USA so as soon as I saw that your boy said they weren’t I smelt the odour of NRA “buy our own opinion” misinformation
     
    Last edited: Aug 11, 2019
  9. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    92,576
    Likes Received:
    74,035
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    About 30% according to the FBI
     
  10. Doug1943

    Doug1943 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2015
    Messages:
    3,741
    Likes Received:
    1,748
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I did supply a link to the website it appeared on. Click on it and just scroll down a bit -- it's on the left side of the page. And at the bottom of the piece is this:
    This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article. Go to my OP and you can click on that link -- the emboldened one -- and read the original article,

    The article is by a PhD in psychology with relevant experience -- the sort of 'expert' on whom we have to rely, while also consultng the views of other experts as well. I'm happy to incorporate the FBI's views, and I often link to their Uniform Crime Statistics, a source of data liberals don't usually like to look at because it's so badly prejudiced against People of Color. That's why I said "Because some conclusions are congruent to my own view of the world, and others are not, I'm going to reserve judgement -- and perhaps do some more web-searching -- before I simply endorse this man's conclusions."

    However, most people find it nearly impossible to study sources of information that may contradict their personal beliefs. So they take a quick look, decide it's the NRA at work, and don't bother to look at the data. Few people want to risk cognitive dissonance. Nothing new here.
     
    Last edited: Aug 11, 2019
    Starjet and guavaball like this.
  11. Doug1943

    Doug1943 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2015
    Messages:
    3,741
    Likes Received:
    1,748
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Might be, since pot has gotten a lot stronger since the hippies. But the most important thing you can learn when you study statistics is this:

    Correlation is not necessarily causation.
     
    James Knapp and Starjet like this.
  12. nra37922

    nra37922 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2013
    Messages:
    13,118
    Likes Received:
    8,506
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    What weapon of war are you referring to?
     
  13. FlamingLib

    FlamingLib Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2018
    Messages:
    3,903
    Likes Received:
    2,192
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What did Warren say that triggered the Ohio shooter? Do you have a source on why he did what he did?
     
  14. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No mass shooting this century has involved a weapon of war.
     
    Well Bonded likes this.
  15. MelKor

    MelKor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2019
    Messages:
    1,154
    Likes Received:
    344
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    Oh sorry...I mean "sporting rifle".....LOL......You NRA types have your own phony definition
     
  16. Zorro

    Zorro Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    77,059
    Likes Received:
    51,759
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes, but there is no causation without correlation.

    If there is a proven correlation between serious mental disorders, heavy pot use, and mass-murder, don't you think it's time for a national conversation on universal background checks and red flag laws for pot users?
     
    Last edited: Aug 11, 2019
  17. Steve N

    Steve N Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2015
    Messages:
    70,998
    Likes Received:
    90,734
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    According to the FBI, in 2016 there were 374 murders using rifles. By contrast, there were 7,105 murders with handguns, 262 with shotguns, 1,604 with knives, 472 with blunt objects and 656 people were beaten to death.

    How come the left isn't focused on handguns since they do the most killing? We all know why and there are two reasons for that: First is 'weapons of war' and assault weapons just have a ring to it that gets people's attention even though it's a lie. The second reason is it would be racist to look at who is doing all the killing with handguns.

    https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u....016/tables/expanded-homicide-data-table-4.xls

    And do us all a favor, don't be criticizing something as a phony definition when you guys toss around the incredibility inaccurate and totally fake term of women's health.
     
    nra37922 and BuckyBadger like this.
  18. BuckyBadger

    BuckyBadger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2018
    Messages:
    12,354
    Likes Received:
    11,778
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Fake news. The majority of mass shooters are not White.
     
    10A likes this.
  19. Nightmare515

    Nightmare515 Ragin' Cajun Staff Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    11,135
    Likes Received:
    4,905
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Background checks are already conducted in regards to any firearm transfer from an FFL. That is already federal law. Background checks don't pull up your medical history. When applying for a specific job or something they can ask you to undergo a mental health screening or medical check or something but otherwise that information is not included in the background check unless its tied to a criminal record. There's some HIPAA stuff involved with that and that's a whole different court fight if we want to try to include medical records and mental health history in background checks. I don't think it's legal to do that.
     
  20. Zorro

    Zorro Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    77,059
    Likes Received:
    51,759
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Not for purchasing guns, but for purchasing marijuana.
     
  21. The Mello Guy

    The Mello Guy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2010
    Messages:
    109,953
    Likes Received:
    37,669
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So maybe include drug tests for all gun purchases? I’m ok with that.
     
  22. Pred

    Pred Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2011
    Messages:
    24,407
    Likes Received:
    17,389
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Try again. Most mass shootings are NOT white men. But that’s what the MSM is pushing. Poor you spreading lies. Collect that paycheck dude. The Russians are paying you well.
     
    10A and nra37922 like this.
  23. Doug1943

    Doug1943 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2015
    Messages:
    3,741
    Likes Received:
    1,748
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Yes I do.
     
    Zorro likes this.
  24. guavaball

    guavaball Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2016
    Messages:
    12,203
    Likes Received:
    8,501
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Exactly my point. Trump didn't trigger this guy either. He admitted it in his own manifesto.

    Or are you going to claim he lied about that but believe when he said he wanted to kill Mexicans?
     
  25. ronv

    ronv Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2018
    Messages:
    20,312
    Likes Received:
    8,774
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Bowerbird likes this.

Share This Page