Pres. Trump Wants Rep. Adam Schiff Arrested For Treason

Yes, I am well aware that you are a primary conduit of Russian propaganda to this site.

And the absurdity of your "one writer" question certainly tells me a lot about your opinions, motivations and tactics.

 

you first.

 

Are you saying that any news sources that do not follow the MSM line is Russian propaganda?

I'm just wondering if that opinion is from brainwashing and liberal one world ideology, or from paranoia and projection?

 

Wondering about how to associate your own strawman to various motivations is a rather crude form of intellectual masturbation, but it does appear you have mastered the technique.

 

...unless it's a Democrat administration accusing a Republican American citizen such as Iva Toguri of treason.

Then you hypocritical Democrats think it's OK.

 

LOL, wow

Maybe want to join this century?

 

You're not actually saying that Schiff has committed treason are you?

 

Reminder, democrats accuse others of what they do.

 

What was that in reply to?

 

Voices in her head?

 

Yes, democrats do have a tendency for calling a shovel a shovel.

 

Except when it is a Democrat.

 

Great post

Really

 

HER?

 

I'm not a Dem, and dodging won't work.

 

Pres. Trump Wants Rep. Adam Schiff Arrested For Treason
Trump is limited in his imagination for ways to respond to those who publicly disagree with him, & most of his attempts come across as rather extreme. This is NOT the kind of character America needs in its President. Trump has many limitations, but a core support group determined to never see them or acknowledge them publicly. They may succeed in keeping him empowered, but they will eventually be forced to recognize the reality that Trump's Presidency hurts them far more than it helps.

 

Yes I am saying Schiff committed treason, as has Polosi. Any member of Congress that tries to overthrow an elected president over some trumped up partisan charges, is guilty of trying to destroy our Constitution and the powers that was specifically designated to the President of the US.

DEMOCRATS
.
HEE HAW!

The media's bought
and on our side,
to help us hide
our 'franken' pride,

of lies, deceits, illicit gain,
hypocrisy and willful shame
of nation; that you all hold dear
while we could care
less - Jeannette




​

 

Just a RW talking point.

 

Well, watching RT roll over itself to protect Trump and try to discredit impeachment is revealing in itself. I used to watch Crosstalk once and a while just to get a different perspective but since Mark Sleboda left it is all clearly Russian talking points and not worth even a passing glance.

 

"The text of the Constitution is relatively straightforward when it comes to treason. The third section of the third article spells that treason against the United States “shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort.” Treason is the only crime defined in the Constitution, and the framers defined it narrowly. It consists only of waging war against the United State or adhering to enemies of the nation by giving them aid and comfort.

There are relatively few cases in which the federal courts have had the opportunity to explain the text of the Constitution in greater detail, though it has been a subject of commentary. The legal scholar George Fletcher, for example, has argued that the “distinguishing feature of treason in the Anglo American tradition” is the “element of breached loyalty.” Indeed, the statutory requirements for treason in the criminal code presume the defendant owed “allegiance to the United States.”
Indeed, one might plausibly argue that Trump himself strayed closer to the line. Imagine credible allegations that the president was willing to consort with a foreign nation in pursuit of personal rather than national interests. While it does not rise to the level of treason, such conduct inches sufficiently close that it would have alarmed the framers. After all, they knew that while geography might protect the United States from foreign invaders, it would not insulate the young nation from corrupting influences. The danger is, as Alexander Hamilton had declared it, “the desire in foreign powers to gain an improper ascendant in our councils.”

https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/464358-adam-schiff-did-not-commit-treason

Yet Trump flouting the constitution and abusing his office by soliciting other nations for his own crass political gain and against the national interest is okay?

 

Even if they are following the legal process?