2nd whistleblower comes forward after speaking with IG: Attorney

How does this change what is already known to be in the publicly disclosed transcript?

 

Is there anything that the dems wont do to destroy democracy. I think not , what a bunch of criminals.

 

What you need is a legitimate source for your laughable claims. Every link on that on that article you sourced that is supposed to back up their claims seems to go to random articles about impeachment. There's not one that gives details about the so-called second whistleblower. It's all masturbation for
Democrats who don't bother reading once their preconceived notions and wild hopes have been satisfied. When Monday rolls around, we'll find out, yet again, that the whole thing's another nothing burger.

 

I gave this a like but I just gotta say this; This I like!! Hilarious...
Regardless if you for or against Trump, this one deserves top spot. Well done!

 

Mueller indicted 34 people some were Russian other such as Manafort were campaign manager, and Flynn a high ranking security advisor.

As far as the Ford chick I lost interest in her because Kavanaugh showed me that he was guilty . He proved his guilt when he ranted denying his guilt like a junior high school girl who was caught on her knees in front her boyfriend in her bedroom by her mother who came home early. You know the old adage me thinks the lady protest too much.

I decided the same thing when Monika's Boyfriend said " I never had sexual relations whith that woman Miss Lewinsky.."

Liars such as Kavanaugh and Billy Clinton are like brothers in crime.

 

How many of those 34 indicted people were named Trump?

That's Supreme Court Justice Kavanaugh to you, skippy.

 

Yep:

"It does not matter," Rep. Chris Stewart, R-Utah, told "Fox News Sunday."

"This person is going to come forward and say, yep the president had this phone call," Stewart, a member of the House Intelligence Committee, said. "And yep, that's the transcript. Why should I care at all what his opinion and judgment of this transcript is? You and I can read it."

 

I just did a search of our members list and there is no skippy here but there is "skip " maybe you meant to address him? You can take it from here.

 

Because this is a whole other whistleblower! This is double more whistleblowing than before! 100% more whistle being blown!

Loud noises!

 

The second whistleblower has first hand knowledge of the infamous phone conversation that we already have a transcript of?

I'm trying to figure out what the surprise is going to be.

 

There should not be a surprise. Gebonees supporting Trump and Trump himself denegrated the credibility of the first blower because he had "indirect" knowledge instead of direct knowledge therefore denegrating his credibility.

 

Well, the NYT did print some fake news to about it, although they quickly had to change their narrative. So it was just like the original accusations, all fluff, no evidence, no reason for anyone with a brain to believe it. Weren't they talking about impeaching Kavanaugh as well? Is that the only thing DNC legislators know how to do?

 

#MeTooWhistleBlower

LMFAO!

 

Lol...Probably fondling himself under those robes. It's also a good way to hide a can of beer.

 

well you have to keep up , Mike
So there was the first whistle blower
Who apparently alleged a quid pro quo...
Then trump released a redacted or edited transcript to prove no quid pro quo
Further, trump assures us to accept this edited transcript because the whistle blower did not actually hear the call and so is lying or incorrect....

Now there is a second whistle blower
Who actually DID hear the call
And says there was a qpq

 

Oh no! You mean someone else came forward to tell us there was a call between Trump and Ukraine, say it isn't so. Oh wait, we already knew that in fact I have inside info I got all over the internet and I actually found out what they talked about. Oooohhhhhhhh!

Zzzzzzzz.........

 

Maybe some of the stuff where the ellipses are.

 

Him drinking beer is not a problem because that may help him make better decisions. But the fondling of himself has to stop. If the SC is deciding on a freedom of sexual fun case or a sexual assault case he should not be deliberating his whacker while deliberating a sex case.

 

Irrelevant.

You could have whistleblowers lined up down the block insisting there was a quid pro quo, but they all get blown out of the water by the simple fact that the supposed "victim"(Ukrainian president) says there was no threat.

Boom. Done.

Just like how the latest crap they tried to pull on Kavanaugh all collapsed when the supposed "victim" couldn't even remember being involved, you're not going to convict someone for committing a victimless crime no matter how many whistles you blow.

 

"Supreme Court Justice Kavanaugh"

Say it loud, so they can hear you in the back.

You've got about the next 30, 40, or so years to get used to it, but you may as well start accepting the reality of it now.

 

So everyone knows that he is young enough to be around for a while. His reletive youth does not make him an honest, a good person, or more importantly it does not make him a good or fair jurist. He may mature or he may stay like he behaved during his confirmation hearing. Like I said he whined like a middle school girl who got caught by her mother performing an oral argument on her knees in front of her boyfriend.

 

Christine Blasey Ford was the woman who accused Kavanaugh.

 

Yes but not "Blasey Ford" since Blasey was not her first name. "You " leave off her first name and with a common name such as Ford who knows who "you" talking about.

 

You do get that the first whistleblower's account became irrelevant the minute Trump released the call transcripts don't you? The idea that the second whistleblower is going to add anything more when we already have the transcripts seems ludicrous.