Veritas Strikes Again: Exposes CNN's 'Anti-Trump Crusade' Zucker's 'Personal Vendetta' Against Trump

I hear ya, whenever I see Michael Moore my olfactory senses transmit the smell of vinegar and asscrack. As young child I experience the same phenomenon at my Aunts house, she had 9 children and all hippie's! Not sure if it was subliminal or the actual event that started the phenomenon ¯\_(º¸º)_/¯

 

WOw that was almost Guru'ish, gave me goose bumps!


Oh wait, they're hives and itchy, never mind!

 

Oh God know

 

That's a lie, already. Can't write two sentences without doing it.

I never claimed your sources were false.

You learned nothing.

I don't have all night so I just responded to This part. I deleted the rest of your twaddle.

 

Itchy dodges are still dodges, although maybe have those itchy attempt to run away examined by both a physician and a logician.

 

No, they are just your run of the mill Hive. If they metastasize in to Dodges I take an antihistamine and rub on some calamine lotion, thank for the heads up!

 

Then why make inferences to that effect? So you can say a thing without commitment?

Is it a matter of leaving yourself an easy out? A hole to crawl through when cornered? You claimed my laziness before was intended to hide dishonesty. I put a good deal of effort into that post. Address it if you care to have an honest discussion. Or call me dishonest and crawl back through your hole.

 

I don't infer you do. I would imply. And I made no such implication.

Why still dishonest?

I don't defend myself against far accusations.

You lied in the first two sentences. I don't really want to go through and point out all your lies.

Sorry you wasted your time and effort maybe next time don't be dishonest.

 

Well you got me on incorrect use of a word. Best to seize on that and avoid the topic you don’t wish to address, but know that I see you for what you are. I had suggested you might do just this, but to prove me right two sentences in is just especially telling. Go ahead and babble about dishonesty as you scurry to your hole like the metaphorical rat you choose to be. I see you.

 

Lol... so thats your spin. Who would have guessed.... video evidence will be stunning.

 

and another lie. I addressed the topic. You falsely accused me of something.

I don't know why you're being so adversarial.

I have to come up with this crazy s*** and accuse me of it? Are you incapable of having conversation? Are you really that limited?

The moment you started posting responses to me me you were falsely accusing me. There's never been any other kind of discussion here. I trigger you a little bit and you go full drama. You melt down.

Maybe you're just too emotional. But I've never scurried off of anything but if you want to tell yourself that if you want you won the day, I'm okay with letting you have your bottle.

 

Then why are you here?

 

Well I guess Trump and Zucker are even. Trump certainly has a vendetta against CNN and anybody else, press or not, who tells the world anything but the nonsense he pretends is truth in his Twitter feed.

 

Can we just all now acknowledge that Zucker thinks that his brand of tyranny is finally something that cannot be allowed to continue in the US? Between Zucker and the google heads, it seems they have collectively demonstrated what the new face of tyranny looks like in this country. We have remedies. The law cannot support these tyrants any longer.

 

To argue with strangers, of course.

 

No spin that is based upon actions and behavior of Veritas.

 

No need just read more slowly

What's the fraud here? The whistleblower came to them with his own recordings from what I am hearing. I'm watching him being interviewed, he is not trying to hide from the public like other alleged whistleblowers, he seems very sincere, very disappointed in what he learned about CNN while working there and simply wants to expose the truth. Is he lying? I don't claim to be a lie-detector but I have no reason to doubt him or that he somehow faked the videos and audios. Any statements from CNN or Zucker claiming they are fake or edited to be out of context? Not that I have seen.

And you cut this out
O'Keefe is not the whistleblower. What federal crimes does the person who worked at CNN have under their belt?

 

The videos will speak for themselves . Veritas probably has a better traack record then cnn or the times wouldn't you agree?

 

Thanks for the clarification. Fraud here? Can’t say I know. Enough fraud in the past not to trust/bother with any of their future works? Tons.
The whistleblower, the individual from CNN, has no crimes I am aware of. I mistook your meaning when I mentioned federal crimes. That is purely on O’Keefe.

 

It didn't need to be clarified it was there to being with. You have said there is fraud here and you said the whistleblower had committed felonies in the past. Can you make up your mind on what you are saying?

 

Would you like me to clarify my clarification? Okay.
Fraud here: No idea. Don’t care. CNN was garbage before, and they still are.
Past fraud: Tons. Enough that I don’t bother seeking information from them as I suspect it will likely be unreliable.
Federal charges: A misunderstanding led to me implying the whistleblower had plead guilty to federal charges. That was not my intent. O’Keefe is the only person involved, that I am aware of, that is guilty of federal crimes.
Does this format better clear things up? Let me know.

 

That is the heart of the matter. CNN has a clear agenda, and its totalitarian in nature.

 

fake news

 

Tucker comments...

 

Looks like Zucker coaches Jake Tapper in real time while he's on the air.