So now women can’t think for themselves? Misogyny is alive and well[/QUOTE] Expecting a woman to make an informed opinion instead of whining about being a victim.is not misogynist.
One does not understand or believe just how much pressure women are under to actually subscribe to groupthink mentality and loyalty to their gender above all else.
There is even a larger reject of marriage among young women. Women used to need men for support but now they can support themselves Expecting a woman to make an informed opinion instead of whining about being a victim.is not misogynist.[/QUOTE] I was being sarcastic!!! I always laugh when people use the word victim as though there is no such thing. Yes we were victims of patriarchy We were accused of whining when we couldn’t vote. We were accused of whining when we were paid less. We were accused of whining when we wanted reproductive freedom. We were accused of whining when women couldn’t get their own credit etc. but meantime our whining paid off because we are not victims of most of these things
How so? Why are they not a bunch of whiners? Don't they deny there is a difference between the sexes?
Not really. 85 % of men want marriage when 95 % of women want marriage. https://www.elitedaily.com/dating/millennial-men-women-marriage/1307524 https://money.cnn.com/2014/07/20/news/economy/millennials-marriage/index.html
I was being sarcastic!!! I always laugh when people use the word victim as though there is no such thing. Yes we were victims of patriarchy We were accused of whining when we couldn’t vote. We were accused of whining when we were paid less. We were accused of whining when we wanted reproductive freedom. We were accused of whining when women couldn’t get their own credit etc. but meantime our whining paid off because we are not victims of most of these things[/QUOTE] Suffragettes fought for the right to vote. Most differences in pay are not due to discrimination and men working more dangerous jobs. It was 7 men who gave women the right to an abortion. But that has nothing to do with your trolling on the Red Pill, which you know nothing about.
Suffragettes fought for the right to vote. Most differences in pay are not due to discrimination and men working more dangerous jobs. It was 7 men who gave women the right to an abortion. But that has nothing to do with your trolling on the Red Pill, which you know nothing about.[/QUOTE] Suffragettes never wanted equality, they wanted the right to vote when men had the right to vote with the obligation to serve in the army in case of war. They wanted the benefits without the obligations. I'm still for the right to vote for women, but with equal obligations to serve in the army. In Taiwan and South Korea, women got the right to vote aswell, but men have still the obligation to serve in the army. Basically, women have a superior citizenship than men as they have the same rights without the same obligations. That's called privilege. Feminist don't want really equality, they want equality where women are unfavoured, but they would never be for equality in the cases where men are in poor position.
But I hope you are aware of how many women initiate divorce. If 85% of men want marriage that hardly is a low number. Men thrive in marriages are usually happier
Yes suffragettes fought for the right to vote and they were considered whiners as well Suffragettes never wanted equality, they wanted the right to vote when men had the right to vote with the obligation to serve in the army in case of war. They wanted the benefits without the obligations. I'm still for the right to vote for women, but with equal obligations to serve in the army. In Taiwan and South Korea, women got the right to vote aswell, but men have still the obligation to serve in the army. Basically, women have a superior citizenship than men as they have the same rights without the same obligations. That's called privilege. Feminist don't want really equality, they want equality where women are unfavoured, but they would never be for equality in the cases where men are in poor position.[/QUOTE] Suffragettes indeed wanted equality and without the vote there could be none.I also have to laugh about your whining about women not serving in the Army. It was me who made those laws banning women from the military. I think there should be a national service for both men and women. But then again you see yourself as a poor white male victim whose enjoyed privileges denied to blacks and women for centuries
It's just dogma, nothing prove it. Concerning army, neither in the USA or south korea or taiwan, they ever asked to be equal on that. You have to bring proof that suffragettes wanted as much obligations than men in war. Concerning marriage, the difference is 10 points, there is biggest difference, but that start to be significant. I don't see myself as a victim, and I would need a serious sickness in my eyes to see myself as white, or maybe a strange mirror. There is two kind of men who have foolish behavour : men that trust women and thinking they will make happy and the dudes in the red pill rage that are obsessed and angry over women. I have seen enough men of the generation of my father being destroyed by divorces, I have seen enough men of my generation being used and manipulated in abusive relationships. Being angry against women would be useless, we don't think in the same way, we don't function in the same way and that's why there can't be no coexistence in that modern world. The problem we all face is that we let our feelings, our animal brain lead us. We do that because we "like" it, because it's comfortable and pleasant. Comfort and pleasure is what lead to drugs, std and being ruined with a costly divorce. Too many idiots end to get serious problems because they trust that feminist legend "every problem root in mascunility, femininity is good, mascunility is evil". There is interesting studies. One led by the london school of economics that have shown that female teacher tended to discriminate their male students over 5 %. Another one, in the psychology field, have shown that both male and female tend to rather save women over men, that basically the life of a woman is more worthy than the one of a man. Another one, that have been repeated and it was ironically led by some feminists, have shown the "women are wonderfull" effet (waw). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_are_wonderful_effect Despite other feminists being angry against that scientific experience, it have never been shown wrong. Again, being mad against that fact would be stupid. You can't change it, and neither men or women are responsible of that. It's like death, you can be mad at the fact that you will eventually die, but it's better to accept it and then wonder what to do with your life. So what to do with the fact that the idea that in the end there is no equality and that your life has less values than some other ? Want to change that ? Why would you be able to change the nature of mankind ? Why would you waste your energy into that ? Being angry or sad ? Those are just emotions, and it will only parasite your mind. It probably explain why women share so much physical common points with children (small chin, high pitched voice, big eyes), because it those signs that trigger our instinct of protection. It explain also why nobody cares that most people dying in dangerous works are men or the over representation of men in sucide. It just give you freedom. Too many men see women with devotion and a kind of bigot caution, they're not different from a chicken covering her eggs by instinct. You will see that instinct that make you consider more women than men as for it is, a stupid automatism rooted in your dna. You will see women in a much colder way, neither hate or appreciation, just detachement. Most men are slaves to that kind of instincts, that's how so many men were convinced to be send to butchery like WW2, "to protect wahmen and children". Feminism is just the purest expression of that instinct that make both men and women consider the life of women over men, all of that disguised in "EqUaLiTy". Young men have to be taught to not listen to feminism, because it would accentuate a negative instinct. In fact, they should be taught to disregard but not hurt women. You can't erase an instinct, unfortunatly, but you can severely repress it. For the happiness of men, they need to overcome that instinct. And you will BTW disagree... Why ? Because you serve the interest of women, both by instinct and ideology. Men being more happy is a threat to your interests and that's why you hate red pill men, because they're a threat to your interest.
