Why the fixation on the whistleblower identity?

That depends. Who's the witness?

 

Yep. And it will cost the Pubs the Senate.
It's the Dems turn to control all three branches of government.

 

So far 15 of them. You can read here.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...als-who-testified-before-congress/4159209002/

 

In this particular case, we know who the "WB" is, and the people he's alingned with, and their tactics. This is just Russian hoax 2.0. They would produce a 1000 "witnesses." It's all irrelevant cuz we seen the transcript.

 

Not necessarily punished, but certainly exposed.

 

Perhaps anonymous sources are just too fishy.

 

That's nice, but sourced people have verified the claims. That would have been a pretty good excuse it his claims hadn't been verified.

 

Doesn’t matter. It is still he said, she said. Why are dems so afraid of the whistleblower being identified?