Watchdog report finds FBI not motivated by political bias in Trump probe

Yep.

I suspect that Bonespurs himself is awaiting handcuffs when he's finished soiling the office of the presidency.

 

You are full it.

If you’re point is he couldn’t subpoena them, fine, but he certainly could’ve went and talk to anybody he felt inclined to talk to. I’m done playing this dumbass game. Regardless what you think, this report carries a lot of weight.

 

Sorry for your confusion. They were not part of his investigation

 

You don’t know that. You don’t have a clue what was part of his investigation

 

Giggles.

 

Why don’t you hold your breath while you wait on these “criminal charges “. I await the results!

 

So you admit you were wrong.
Thanks again

 

Negative. But then I then you’re so off topic you make zero sense and look foolish.

 

LOL, quite the imagination you have here.

 

Oh, so he was authorized and did interview them as part of his investigation? Do tell more

 

Then you would be okay if, say, you were put on trial and the jury were all biased against you. They all signed paperwork beforehand saying they wouldn't let their bias sway their decision, though.

You'd be cool with that.

Me? Not so much.

 

The left has pushed for impeachment since November 2016. They were going to impeach regardless of what happened in 2017, 2018, and 2019.

That is bad faith.

 

Absolutely correct.

 

No, no “however”. It is a major issue when biased federal employees attempt to frame an American citizen in order to either A prevent his election, or B remove that citizen is elected.

 

For your edification.

 

I want to hear what Durham finds on who authorized and why the surveillance of General Flynn. The national security adviser to the transition team, to the incoming President. What business did they have spying on him?

 

Well what's he missing exactly? I think he gets that the Mueller Report showed no collusion, no cooperation by Trump with Russians. I think he gets this report is devastating to the FBI and the entire process that took place with SIGNIFICANT abuses of the law, "fundamental errors".

Inspector general finds 'significant errors or omissions' in Trump adviser surveillance warrant

".....a Justice Department inspector general report hands powerful new ammunition to the president’s allies, sharply criticizing the bureau for “serious performance errors” and “significant” errors and omissions in its applications for a secret surveillance warrant targeting a member of Trump’s campaign."
https://news.yahoo.com/inspector-ge...p-adviser-surveillance-warrant-223102113.html

And they ALL went AGAINST Trump. And ALL the evidence they gathered from their spying on the Trump campaign and associates was EXCULPATORY. And they buried that from the FISA court and continued to apply for FISA warrants.

You think it ends here with all the abuses by high level government officials he listed in his evidence?

 

Juries are always biased against defendants. Just by virtue of being indicted, you're regarded as a shady character. Haven't you ever been on a jury? Aren't you aware of how indicted people are treated in this society? When Manafort was indicted everyone knew he was going to be found guilty. Same with Roger Stone, Michael Flynn, etc.

Now, to your specific question, would I, a proud Democrat care if a Republican is a jury member (and somehow this person learns I'm a Democrat)? No. People aren't going to convict someone just because they're biased against their politics. Lisa Page isn't going to throw her career away and act illegally just because she hates Trump. And apparently she didn't act illegally. And now she's suing the DOJ. Good for her. I think she'll win.

I'm sure you're biased (like me) and you're still able to do your job (like me) because you're able to do your job in spite of your biases. Just like all the other millions of people who go to work everyday. It's not like it's hard to do.

People are allowed (and expected) to have political biases. The IG report said those biases didn't affect the investigation into Trump. Why isn't the IG report the end of the story with some of you?

Yes, I would be OK with a Republican promising to set aside their biases against me, a Democrat, and act as a faithful juror. Are you saying you couldn't be impartial if you were a juror and someone from the other party was on trial? Really? You're not saying that, are you.

 

When did this happen?

 

Process crimes created by the investigation mostly.

 

From what I have heard today, the IG report says no 'documentary' evidence of bias. That does not imply there is no evidence, just that the evidence is not documented, e.g., emails or texts.

 

Durham will find out.

 

It boils down to if one can trust the same govt that habitually lies to the people . The same govt and people who have not represented the average american for decades according to the Princeton Study. That of course msm hardly covered if any at all.

The corrupt system obviosly protects itself. And you get entertained by theater.

All of this ccircus is like a drug like Soma. It distracts as the system protects itself. And that system cannot be trusted and yet partisans in ignorance obviously trusts what cannot be trusted.

The few that try to inform us of the hard cold facts are blacked out in msm at best. Men of honesty and integrity like Hedges and Nader. Men who know what is going on as anyone could see if they could only look and pay attention as decades went by.

No one can or should they trust their govt and the people who rule over us. And yet apparently far too many do trust when the tribes fight. And these fights are just like two old bald men fighting over a damned comb!

 

Sorry, that's the conclusion of the IG report

Cry to Horowitz

 

FBI cleared and donnie proven wrong yet again

That's reality, sport

Kleenex?