Christianity topics that should not be discussed in Political Threads.

The heat that makes you steam the way you do.

YEah, I do. And I do not trust you.

Just another thing you are wrong about.

It is a guess...and a blind guess at that.

Yeah...you do.

I am not even an atheist...let alone a "stereotypical" one. Sorry I am triggering you so.

Take a rest.

I'll be right here for you once you get back under control.

 

He never met Jesus. Ever.

 

No one heard that conversation. No one seen anything.
The only one to know any of it is the persecutor of Christians, Saul. Who could easily be doing the work of Satan to lead people astray. Just as much validity in that as there is in his made up story.

 

Can't say I do.

 

Then the bible means nothing to you and you are not equipped to understand it..

 

I also was never catholic. Mary is nothing more than the one who gave birth to Jesus.

So one must have some sort of magic in them to understand the bible? Just reading what is says and means isn't enough.
Which is why there are so many different interpretations of the bible, I guess. Everyone feels different.

 

Magic? No. If you read the bible you would have read Jesus's explanations of His parables. " Though having ears they do not hear and having eyes they do not see.:

Belief comes before understanding..

 

And if the belief is in the Buddah?

 

Oh thank you, o scholar and "fount" of Gospels.

 

You are welcome.
I notice you could not refute the fact no one, but no one, knows about that supposed vision. But Saul himself.

 

I'll take the Bible over random internet guy, for 250$ Alex.

 

The bible doesn't know either. There is no one mentioned in the bible that knows if Saul the persecutor heard anything at all. Or had a vision.
Not one single person from the bible can attest to the supposed vision.
Only have to take Saul's word for it.

Again, you haven't refuted that. Just ad hom.

 

Your argument is with the Bible, flail away.

 

No..

 

dodge, deflect, ad hom away.

Yes, the argument is with your bible verse. For it is completely made up.
If you have a point, state who besides Saul knows if there was a vision and who the vision was with.

Instead of ad hom me, state you case.

 

But a belief in buddah leads to an understanding.
Just not the same belief or understanding as yours.

 

Himan argument in a spiritual debate, you just lost. And you cannot for the life of you figure out how or even ablevto comprehend why i would say such a thing.

And it's super simple.

 

LOL @ "my" Bible verse.
You brought it and up and spun off straw men, like tordanoes from a hurricane.

 

Biddah was just a man andvhe is dead on his grave..

 

I accept your surrender.
I spun nothing. IF I did, you can tell me, who besides Saul is aware of the vision you claim is proof Saul knew Jesus.

5 posts from you and all you can do is ad homs. You aren't even attempting to address your claim form your bible verse you quoted.

 

So? Maybe that is true. But we're talking some belief.
Jesus rising is only a belief. Not necessarily true.
In fact, science can't prove it to be true.

 

You completely misunderstand the debate.

It is your burden to prove that the story in acts is false, not fir us to prove it's true..

 

Science doesn't have to prove it true , you have to prove it false.. burden of proof os yours.. all yours

 

Sure, when someone proves God is true. If that can't be done, then the bible isn't considered true.

And I proved my point. NO ONE, but Saul, knows there was a vision. And if there was a vision, who the vision was about.
Not one other biblical character can say Saul had a vision and it was with Jesus. Proven. Done.

But I will await your proof of corroboration other than the persecutor himself.

My guess is your proof is the same as fatback, which will be ZERO.