Watchdog report finds FBI not motivated by political bias in Trump probe

Our economy has been improving for at least 8 years in a row. Trump has only been in office for three years.

 

I don't care what you think.
The topic is what the IG said

 

The word "inexplicable" could not be used to describe what went on there.

1) The economy has never stayed down, for "irrational exuberance" or a "housing bubble"; once irrationality ends and bubbles pop, things are bound to go up.

2004 Democratic Platform:

"Average family debt is higher than ever. And as they lose the struggle to make ends meet, one out of every seven middle class families may be bankrupt by the end of the decade...over time, fiscal discipline saves families thousands of dollars on their mortgages and credit cards.”

“You have probably caught that Visa credit card commercial in which a wily wife hides her many shopping sprees under the bed and up in the attic, all out of sight from her clueless husband.
The punch line is that she could have won all that stuff she rung up on the plastic. But the reality behind such behavior is hardly a laughing matter.” (Rene a. Guzman, San Antonio Express-News Jan. 12, 2005 12:00 AM)

PAY ATTENTION: Why do you think I have that quote?

Neither Feeney or Kosmas responded to this:

"No creditor shall issue debt to any household which could exceed a 36% debt to income ratio, without the written knowledge and consent of both spouses or domestic partners in the household and each and every creditor the household already owes."

2) If you paid attention you would know that slavery ended, then the credit crunch, then the FED told Congress (on C-span) that banks relied upon such irresponsible debt to subsidize small business loans, so DEMOCRATS reinstituted slavery to end the credit crunch and improve the economy:

End of slavery:

“The Federal Reserve's rule told credit card companies that they no longer can consider household income when assessing the creditworthiness of an individual who applies for his or her own card. Under the rule, only an individual's own salary or other income -- rather than combined household income -- can be considered.”
Read more: http://www.creditcards.com/credit-c...cards-household-income-1282.php#ixzz3WiwAm9JK

Slavery reinstituted:

“U.S. Reps. Carolyn Maloney, D-NY, and Louise Slaughter, D-NY, both among the principal authors of the CARD Act, said the rule ‘goes beyond the intent’ of the law and ‘represents a serious risk for women in abusive domestic partnerships.’"
Read more: http://www.creditcards.com/credit-c...cards-household-income-1282.php#ixzz3Wivmh5r8

The word "inexplicable" when applied to why the FBI, as far as we know only on this case, made so many errors goes easily to the argument of bias.

 

Collusion bombshell: DNC lawyers met with FBI on Russia allegations before surveillance warrant
https://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/4...ll-dnc-lawyers-met-with-fbi-on-dossier-before

no bias my ass

 

Not sure what your asking

 

No bias

Confirmed

You need to accept reality

 

Reality is pulling onto base at 2:00 AM and the hottie security guard you've been chatting up at night for months is on duty, and she says that they have been ordered to follow you, so getting pulled over on the bicycle and given tickets for speeding and not using proper signals...was no documentary evidence of bias.

Reality is the County Attorney pointing you out (your first time ever there) to each and every gray headed former DEMOCRAT on the commission meeting as they entered a standing room only meeting, and being denied the right to speak at free time, being denied the right to get on the agenda in violation of the ordinance, because you have proof the County Attorney committed a felony, and the minutes of the meeting at the Zoning board meeting (first time ever there) you got on the agenda of before they could stop you, so they pick you last, and the minutes of the meeting don't show you were there when the only blond (Republican) zoning board member who was not whispered into the ear of by the County Attorney at the beginning of the meeting said, "If I was you I would have taken the law into my own hands," which obviously was not in the minutes of the meeting or in the newspaper (whose last reporter was fired after the owners who said they were afraid of retaliation and I had to get on the agenda to get the story run) because there is NO DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE OF BIAS. {take a breath}

{That last sentence is deliberate, that is how much I hate DEMOCRATS!}

 

You hate every Democrat?

That's as unbalanced as your post

 

Neither your quote or the actual report confirms any bias unless you are confused enough to think performance and bias are synonyms.

 

Funny how no actual moves were made to impeach until of course his attempt to bribe Ukraine into lying about investigating Biden. In fact it is To the left’s credit that a Trump was not impeached until the evidence was overwhelming.

And by the way if you actually bother to read the !Mueller report Trump was not exonerated of obstruction of justice.

 

Funny how they didn’t impeach till the evidence was indisputable even though supposedly they were going to in 2016, 2017, and 2018.

And not one fact witness has come foreword to testify under oath on Trump’s behalf. And no one has provided any evidence whatsoever about Trump ever caring about actual corruption, nor has any explanation be made as to why the aid was withheld or why the aid was miraculously released right after the whistleblower complaint. And then there is the laughable Trump “ I wanted nothing from Ukraine” and there was no quid pro quo statement made right after Trump was made aware of the whistleblower complaint.

 

Its a sham and it just handed 2020 to Trump.

Well done, Democrats.

 

Actually the OMB put out the explanation but you won't hear it on the demedia.

Not one fact witness had any facts to witness other than hearsay and presumption.

 

oh, you mean the after the fact OMB explanation unsupported by any evidence. Yes we ignored that for lack of content.

You must have missed Sonenberg’s testimony among others. Plenty more testimony about the Trump phone call

 

So your position is he would have lost the election based on his performance as President?

 

Where did you get that? Nothing you posted was in that post.

 

Of course the dem clown show should be ignored since it had no evidence. Of course you ignore facts for hearsay and assumptions.

You must have missed where Sondland admitted his 'quid pro quo' was entirely presumed and he witnessed nothing.

LOL, you can read the Trump phone call that the dem clown show called a 'quid pro quo' which requires a quid and a quo but unfortunately missed one of them entirely.

 

Sorry to disappoint you but I have two get out of being blackened for hating all Democrats free cards:

"The United States deplores any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of [those who hate all Democrats]." (Clinton)

"We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of [those who hate all Democrats]." (Obama)

And the cards were official Statecraft too.

 

The title of the report doesn't have the word "bias" in it, it does have "FISA" in it:
"Review of Four FISA Applications and Other Aspects of the FBI's Crossfire Hurricane Investigation"

Therefore, once again, like I said before, the important part:

“The FBI should review the performance of all employees who had responsibility for the preparation, Woods review, or approval of the FISA applications, as well as the managers, supervisors, and senior officials in the chain of command of the Carter Page investigation for any action it deems appropriate.”

 

That is exactly what it said. If the impeachment handed the election to Trump it means he probably would not have won without being impeached. Or at best the election was up in the air and Trump needed the impeachment because his record wasn’t good enough even for his supporters.

 

And I know getting you to understand that nowhere is bias mentioned or even implied is like beating the eyes of the blind to make them see.

 

Sure, hon

And there is no pee tape

Oops

 

Are you hearing voices?

Is someone supposed to have one clue what you're babbling about

 

No there is not.

Don't worry though-Trump was just given a gift.

 

Actually there is

Best part of the Mueller report

Pee boy had Cohen running around Russia looking for the tape. Meaning he knew it existed

You sound shocked that the p--- grabber is a sexual pervert

C'mon, no one is that gullible