The Fair Vote

Why would I be? I’ve thoroughly demolished your position. Texas v white. States can not secede.

 

It can get thrown out tomorrow

 

Not according to the constitution or the Supreme Court. It’s why texas is a state.

 

No it can’t.

 

A 1868 ruling?
How embarrassing try harder the year is 2019

 

Yes it can

Quit embarrassing yourself

 

I will play all night long to refute propaganda, so you done?

Sleep tiger I will mess with facts again in the morning.

 

Wow you really ran from me again

 

A COMMON FARCE

From here, the factual legal argument regarding the matter; excerpt - Secession in the United States - Wikipedia

And from the above designated site as well:

So, try it and we'll see what happens. In the first instance we shall see how the state's National Guard will be - uh - "nationalized" by the PotUS and occupies the Governor's Office as well as gathering physically the Governor and the state's congressional offices and the legislators having voted for the law exiting the Union being incarcerated.

If the National Guard does not respond to the President's command (to which it is obliged by law to do - see Militia Act of 1903), then other US forces will be called upon to perform the military-operation.

'Nuff said? Methinks not. So, Go-for-it! Fox News will have a field-day covering it on national-TV - with interviews directly from the ex-governor's prison-cell ... !

PS: In Union of the nation there is a common force, in disunion there is common farce.

 

Damn it - WE MUST NOT HAVE THAT ... ! ;^)

 

Blah blah blah ignore

 

The text you cited, "No state may leave the treaty" doesn't actually exist. I think you're making stuff up.

 

He/she is. He/she has been caught and called out on it, but is to proud to admit it.

When does will ignorance become a lie?

 

And states still can’t secede. Texas v white.

 

You have been getting pounded over the head with facts this whole thread, lol.

 

Uh, I’m right here. Still refuting your bullshit.

 

Strawman

 

What you just posted is not listed in the constitution. I accept your apology.

 

Of course it is. The specific language is in the ruling. You just refuse to read it.

 

We've all read it. We've asked you to cite which text from the CONSTITUTION you're REFERRING to. Apparently that request is so difficult you're more willing to post 100's of times on this thread without doing a simple "copy and paste" from the constitutional text you claim exists.

Which means- IT DOESN'T!

LOL

 

You haven’t read it. But it’s why Texas is still a state.

 

There's a reason everyone on this thread keeps asking you to cite the text. You cited a court case. You never once cited constitutional text. You just keep saying "It's there- keep looking". But you've never once done the easiest thing in the world which is "copy and paste" your claims.

I know that if I wanted to make a claim and someone asked me to cite what I'm referring to...I'd just copy and paste the text of which I'm referring to....that way I don't have to make 100 embarrassing posts where I say "look it up! I'm sure it's there!!".

What's being asked of you is VERY simple. You're making this more difficult. If you cannot copy and paste the constitutional text to which you CLAIM exists...we now know it's made up.

Don't worry- we know you won't cite it so don't bother responding. You lost this one little guy

 

We all know none of you have read the ruling. Meanwhile, states can’t secede as the court pointed out.

 

You failed to cite the text you're "claiming" exists. Troll on alt lefties, troll on

 

I’ve repeatedly cited it. It’s in the ruling. You just refuse to read it for some reason. Meanwhile, states can’t secede as the court pointed out.