Watchdog report finds FBI not motivated by political bias in Trump probe

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by PARTIZAN1, Dec 9, 2019.

  1. Professor Peabody

    Professor Peabody Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    94,819
    Likes Received:
    15,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So what did Trump supposedly say that wasn't in the transcript he released? Quotes please. No witnesses state what they believe is true. There are people in jail falsely identified by witnesses. Witnesses back up hard evidence.
     
    Last edited: Dec 15, 2019
  2. hampton86

    hampton86 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2016
    Messages:
    974
    Likes Received:
    328
    Trophy Points:
    63
  3. hampton86

    hampton86 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2016
    Messages:
    974
    Likes Received:
    328
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Facts are clearly not your strong suit

    For context, it's worth noting that Donald Trump has assured the public that the released call summary is "an exact word-for-word transcript of the conversation." In fact, the American president has referred to the document as an "exact" transcript at least 16 times.

    It now appears those claims were false -- and it's a curious thing for Trump to have lied about
     
  4. Professor Peabody

    Professor Peabody Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    94,819
    Likes Received:
    15,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    With a claim of hearsay evidence. Don't make me laugh.
     
  5. hampton86

    hampton86 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2016
    Messages:
    974
    Likes Received:
    328
    Trophy Points:
    63
    It was the guy whose job it was to fix the transcript

    He confirmed WH changed transcript

    First party

    Oops
     
  6. Professor Peabody

    Professor Peabody Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    94,819
    Likes Received:
    15,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Proof please. Oh wait we're just supposed to take your word for it right? :roflol:
     
  7. hampton86

    hampton86 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2016
    Messages:
    974
    Likes Received:
    328
    Trophy Points:
    63
    No, we're supposed to take the word of the actual guy, who just happens to be a highly decorated American soldier

    Is this where you magats start bashing the troops and law enforcement again?
     
  8. Professor Peabody

    Professor Peabody Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    94,819
    Likes Received:
    15,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    He said/she said doesn't result in convictions. Where is Vindman's quote? Contradicting Trump's transcript. Post it or you're done here.
     
  9. hampton86

    hampton86 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2016
    Messages:
    974
    Likes Received:
    328
    Trophy Points:
    63
    It's in the transcript from the impeachment hearings

    You really that clueless??

    I'll let you get back to your girlie conspiracies
     
  10. Dutch

    Dutch Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2010
    Messages:
    46,383
    Likes Received:
    15,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    But of course the FBI was motivated. There’s no doubts about it.

    If the Watchdog investigated dick Clinton and found there’s no evidence Clinton’ a dick, would you exonerate him in your mind?
     
  11. hampton86

    hampton86 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2016
    Messages:
    974
    Likes Received:
    328
    Trophy Points:
    63
    You lost, chief

    No deep state

    No alien lizard people

    Time to accept defeat and move on
     
  12. Paul7

    Paul7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2012
    Messages:
    15,854
    Likes Received:
    11,608
    Trophy Points:
    113
  13. Paul7

    Paul7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2012
    Messages:
    15,854
    Likes Received:
    11,608
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Those 17 'mistakes' the IG found all going against Trump is just a coincidence, huh? They weren't mistakes, they were misconduct and you better wait til Durham and Barr are finished before your victory laps.
     
  14. CourtJester

    CourtJester Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2013
    Messages:
    27,769
    Likes Received:
    4,921
    Trophy Points:
    113
    thank for finally figuring out the actual report does not support your contention of bias. My work here is done and truth finally triumphs.
     
  15. Paul7

    Paul7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2012
    Messages:
    15,854
    Likes Received:
    11,608
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Just the corrupt few who directed the Coup Attempt. Funny, bashing cops and soldiers is a favorite pastime of the LW.
     
  16. Paul7

    Paul7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2012
    Messages:
    15,854
    Likes Received:
    11,608
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Barr and Durham disagree with that conclusion. If there was no bias you'd have to believe it was just a coincidence all 17 'mistakes' the IG discovered went against Trump. The odds of that are 100,000 to 1. You really want to say there was no bias in the FBI lawyer who altered exculpatory evidence that was in Carter Page's favor?
     
  17. CourtJester

    CourtJester Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2013
    Messages:
    27,769
    Likes Received:
    4,921
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Actually since the investigation was about Trump what did you expect. And nobody can take a statement by Barr provided without any actual evidence seriously.

    Barr has long ago proven to be a liar who does not even bother to pretend to meet the requirements of his position. Remember his lie about what the Mueller report actually said.
     
  18. Paul7

    Paul7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2012
    Messages:
    15,854
    Likes Received:
    11,608
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Will you be making up smears against Durham too if he indicts? I suppose to you, Schiff, Nadler and Pelosi are the embodiment of unbiased truth seekers, right?
     
    Last edited: Dec 15, 2019
  19. Nemesis

    Nemesis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2012
    Messages:
    16,118
    Likes Received:
    8,845
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Weren't you also stating "why, you! You just wait until the IG report comes out!!!"?

    Instead, he specifically debunked the facially ridiculous "deep state",and the "bias! Waaaahhhhh!" narratives.
     
  20. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    LOL, no evidence needed.
     
  21. DivineComedy

    DivineComedy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2011
    Messages:
    7,629
    Likes Received:
    841
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Truth is only a matter of opinion here, bias cannot be disproven by a lack of “documentary or testimonial evidence,” and in fact, no member of the Obamanation that voted for the following traitors can denigrate the religiously held bias of the FBI if there was such evidence, so obviously no such bias can exist for you.

    "The United States deplores any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of others." (Clinton)

    "We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others." (Obama)

    The Obamanation traitors are bound by that, but many like me are the others, and with ardor and faith, religiously we believe there was bias at the FBI.

    Your Obamanation cannot denigrate our belief the FBI was biased, that is a provable truth at this point along with this fact:

    The FBI should review the performance of all employees who had responsibility for the preparation, Woods review, or approval of the FISA applications, as well as the managers, supervisors, and senior officials in the chain of command of the Carter Page investigation for any action it deems appropriate.
     
    Last edited: Dec 15, 2019
  22. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    LOL, Goldman, the dem witness professor writes about the deep state.
     
  23. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    150,175
    Likes Received:
    62,815
    Trophy Points:
    113
    extreme bs maybe, that is why the fed pouring money into the economy to try and delay the crash and keeping interest rates so low
     
  24. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    150,175
    Likes Received:
    62,815
    Trophy Points:
    113
    actually it did show some political bias in the Clinton investigation, which we all knew about do to all the fbi leaks about the Clinton investigation and no leaks about the Trump investigation
     
    Last edited: Dec 15, 2019
  25. Paul7

    Paul7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2012
    Messages:
    15,854
    Likes Received:
    11,608
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I was more wait until the Durham report comes, since he has the power to subpoena those not currently in the DOJ, and can convene a Grand Jury and indict. If the IG came up with nothing why did Comey say today he was wrong and the IG was right?

    Barr and Durham disagree, meaning your side has a big problem. The IG agreed the FBI used fraudulent evidence with the FISA courts and altered exculpatory evidence, among other things. Is that OK?
     
    Last edited: Dec 15, 2019

Share This Page