GOP Senator Puts Nancy Pelosi on Notice; No Articles by Monday, He Will Introduce Measure to Dismiss

And why did the shady money transfers go through Latvia which is a known money laundering source?

 

A misguided claim (courtesy of Conspiratorial RW Comedian John Solomon) that has been debunked 1000x over.

John Solomon's new “scoop” about Ukraine and Hunter Biden debunks itself

https://www.mediamatters.org/trump-...about-ukraine-and-hunter-biden-debunks-itself

I am actually surprised that anyone would even reference that thoroughly Debunked Conspiracy.:smh:

Anyway, back to the Actual OP Topic and Pelosi:

She has now agreed to submit the Articles and Mitch can have his Sham Trial.

 

No bigger sham the the Adam Schiff show in the house.

He didn’t like the 8 hours of Atkinson testimony, so he doesn’t release it.

The democrats can only blame Schiff when the senate gives them the shaft.

Partisan politics are a two way street.

 

Nope. No maybes.
This week. No concessions.

 

So Mick Mulvany was lying ?

Giuliani wasn’t in the Ukraine lobbying for the investigation ?

You think Gordon Sondland was lying ?

The Defense Department and the OMB didn’t warn Trump that holding the money was illegal ?

And what should the Biden be investigated for exactly ? And should that happen in the US or in the Ukraine ? I’m all for investigating the Bidens, they could be guilty, but that in no way allows Trump to do what he said ? And if were going to be honest, then the same “fishy” behavior should be investigated as to why Ivanka was awarded Chinese patents while her daddy was negotiating trade deals with China ?

 

Mulvaney had no direct knowledge of a crime or Quid Pro Quo

Sondland was a joke & he admitted he had no facts, just an opinion.

Guilliani didn’t break any laws.

Trump released the money without a quid quo pro and Ukraine didn’t even know it was being held.

It comes down to this....

The Adam Schiff show in the house has united the GOP & Partisan politics work both ways.

Trump will be Vindicated in the impeachment trial.

Stay tuned for his presidential ads telling you just that.

 

Frankly, you lost everybody with your first ridiculous sentence.. I'll have to assume the rest of it followed suit..

 

Trump used executive privilege on Mulvaney & Bolton and that is his right as president.

The democrats could have challenged it in court, by they didn’t and that is there mistake.

Obama used executive privilege for the fast and Furious investigation, so this is a president’s right.

 

Who knows? It was illegal for Bill Clinton to commit perjury, suborn perjury and obstruct, should he have been removed from office?

 

Heck, George Washington ignored a House subpoena.

 

Well, we can agree to disagree on that...

This isn't about Obama's use (or misuse) of the tool..

 

Your not serious ?

He absolutely admitted facts. The only reason he decided to testify is because they had him in the lie that “nothing happened”. There were others present who testified the truth. He didn’t want to go to jail, so he testified

The right in this country has been saying since day one that it was about the “call”. The left has been saying since day one that this was bigger than just the call. The dump from the Intelligence Committee today PROVES that Giuliani was there to do just that.

Actually they did......and Trump released it only on the day that Schiff announced that they were holding the money based on what the Whistleblower said.........

It’s so bad right now that I was just watching Fox News and they were actually now admitting that he DID do this, but “it doesn't rise to the level of an impeachable offense”. It’s getting ridiculous now.

We know for sure that Trump did hold the money, to say he didn’t after all the email dumps in the last couple of weeks that he was being told by multiple people, from multiple departments that what he was doing was actually illegal, Is disingenuous to the debate

He absolutely will be supported in the senate. That has NOTHING to do with his guilt or innocence and you know it. Mitch McConnell has been working WITH the White House on what he should do in the Senate. The Senate is a kangaroo court and you know it.

 

YES. He should have been removed. His lying on the stand was not only stupid, it WAS illegal and he should have been removed. Sadly the republicans in the Senate saved him (not sure why)

 

Sorry, Mulvaney has not testified.... my error.
You will need to wait for his book.

As far as the senate trial goes, your right he will be Vindicated in the senate.

Your partisan cries of senate fouls falls on deaf ears after how Schiff ran the kangaroo court in the house.

What ever happened to the 8 hour of testimony from IG Atkinson?

He testified in September and Schiff won’t release the transcript.

Don’t you think that is fishy?

Did Atkinson connect Schiff to the whistleblower?

This is all partisan politics on both sides and both sides are guilty of being unethical.

In the end Trump will survive and will be re-elected because the democrats have gone too far to the left.

 

Actually, Trump released it on 9/11, 2 days after the WH got Schiff's letter.... small difference, but the point it was clearly after the WH knew the House was involved.

If you are watching Fox News, it IS bad....

 

Atkinson testified in October, not September, and I also join the call to release this, with any required redactions..

I don't suspect anything fishy, and I wouldn't waste my time listening to Ratcliffe and The Epoch Times here... If most people have moved on from the WB, since almost everything he wrote has proven true, people certainly need to move on from Atkinson...

 

Why would we let Schiff get away with hiding 8 hours of testimony that he does not want us to hear?

The whistleblower is a known political partisan who has a history of being a leaker. He use to work for Biden and Brennan. His close friends also work for Schiff, so there is definitely a need to cross examine him if they do decide for witnesses.

His name is no longer a secret....
His name is Eric Ciaramella

If they want to keep up the myth that he needs to be protected, have him sit behind something so people can’t see his face.

 

Executive privilege allows the President to hide the truth plain and simple.

 

"So Mick Mulvany was lying ?"

No, he never said anything incriminating. As usual, the liars have dishonestly taken his words out of context.

 

are you serious ?

Mick Mulvany said that they withheld the money and that they “do it all the time”......

 

Oh. So, what's wrong with that?

I thought that you were talking about his "quid pro quo" comment.

 

Mulvany said they held the money.

So is your position that because he didn't say the words "quid pro quo" that this was legal ?

 

We all know that the money was delayed.