Schiff may have mischaracterized Parnas evidence, documents show

There are constitutional scholars who disagree with OJ’s Lawyer

 

So, he lied the first time or the second time?

Which is it?

And he already said that his statements were based on "presumptions", not fact.

 

Adam Schiff is a liar and a hypocrite. He sums up just how far the democrats have fallen off the cliff and how far they will go to try and manipulate the 2020 election (that they can't win) and to try and overturn the 2016 election (that they lost).

Schiff should be indicted for his slander and for his attempt to bring down the government of the United States.

 

Presumptions confirmed by everyone we’ve heard from lol
Why doesn’t trump send over some witnesses who say it didn’t happen?

 

If you were accused of a crime, would you accept "Because it would take years" as a valid reason for skipping court proceedings, and just going straight to the part where they find you guilty?

 

Sondland changed his statement after hearing everyone else give their opinion, presumptions, hearsay and second hand information

He wanted in on the fake news story action for his future book and speech tour.

 

I don’t know what you’re talking about. Nobody has found him guilty and he’s free to supply all the requested docs and witnesses.

 

I'm talking about due process.

You're admitting that the Dems impeached Trump without any findings of guilt?

He's also free not to supply anything. Again, due process.

 

An impeachment is not a finding of guilt. Maybe this is where you’re getting so confused? Impeachment is basically an indictment.

 

Wow trump really hires winners huh? Lol

 

Ya, but he lied to take Trump out and reverse Americas break from global authoritarian collectivism. Hes even more their hero.

By Any Means Necessary.

 

Wow Obama really hired winners huh? Lol

• Adolfo Carrion - kickbacks from developers (Urban Czar nominee)
• Bill Richardson - pay-to-play donor contract scandal (Commerce Secretary)
• Jon Cannon - mismanaged $25 million in EPA grants (EPA Administrator)
• Steven Rattner - pay-to-play scandal (Car Czar)
• Rahm Emanuel – tax cheat and made $320,000 at the failing Freddie Mac (White House Chief of Staff).
• Larry Summers – $8 million in compensation and speaking fees from bailed out company (Economic Advisor)
• Ronald Sims - financial mismanagement, ethical transgressions and egregious abuses of freedom of information law (HUD nominee)
• Louis Caldera – resigned over the Manhattan flyover fiasco (Director of the White House Military Office)
• Timothy Geithner – tax cheat and told AIG to withhold information from public (Treasury secretary)
• Tom Daschle – tax cheat (HHS Secretary Nominee)
• Nancy Killefer – tax cheat (Chief Performance Officer Nominee)
• Ron Kirk – tax cheat (U.S. Trade Representative)
• Kathleen Sebelius - tax cheat (HHS nominee)
• Capricia Marshall – tax cheat (chief of protocol for the State Department)
• Valerie Jarrett - managed Rezko real estate scandal (Obama Advisor)
• Jide Zeitlin - identity fraud (Appointee to the UN)
• Erroll Southers - illegal background check on former wife's boyfriend (TSA appointee)

 

Clinton was found guilty. He was guilty as sin. NOBODY with half a brain cell doubted his guilt. There was a girl standing there with the Presidential batter on her dress, and the nationally broadcasted testimony of Bill Clinton speaking those damning lies that we all know and love. BOOM! PERJURY! GUILTY!

There was nobody calling for "More investigations!" and "More witnesses!" to make the case against Clinton. There was no need, because he was pinned to the mat and his guilt was a matter of public record and a truth universally accepted.

Slick Willy was indicted HARD. Like with a BOOM!

So that's the difference between this current impeachment, and the last one- the whole "finding of guilt" thing.

This current impeachment is sure as Hell is NOT a finding of guilt, you're absolutely correct about that.

 

Who? We’re talking about trump and how his ambassador is making up stories and still in his job. Maybe the guy with deepest pockets is a bad way to decide who you hire?

 

Clinton was acquitted in the senate. Maybe you missed that part...

 

As well he should have been. It was a politically-motivated crap impeachment, same as the current impeachment. The major differences between the two impeachments being the whole FINDING OF GUILT thing.

Clinton was found guilty as sin, whereas, as you yourself admit, in regards to Trump's guilt, and I quote "Nobody has found him guilty"

I know all about it. Maybe it was the Dems who missed it, because you'd think they would've seen where their sham impeachment was headed if they had taken into consideration how the last political hit job impeachment turned out.

 

Spare me the fricking outrage.

You didn't give a crap that Obama hired corrupt liars and crooks.

 

Trump will also be acquitted !

 

But impeachment was stain on Clinton forever!

Yeah, nobody gave a crap about Clinton's impeachment, same as they won't give a crap about Trump's.

 

You’ve convinced me never to vote for him again. But trump said he’d hire the best people...did he mean best at writing him big checks?

 

Probably. But he’ll forever be impeached

 

There's nothing to disagree with. The SCOTUS ruling sets precedent. point blank period.

 

Falsehood flies, and the Truth comes limping after it; so that when Men come to be undeceiv’d, it is too late; the Jest is over, and the Tale has had its Effect…

 

How many times can they call the guy out before no one believes a word he says?

 

Sounds like you’re on the side of more witnesses and docs. Give the truth a ride if that’s really what you want.