John Kelly: Vindman Was Right to Report Trump’s ‘Illegal Order’ on Ukraine

I said Witness RETALIATION - not witness intimidation.

Don't dogpile without reading.

 

I think every legal expert knows more that Dershowitz in 2019 - including Dershowitz in 1999.

 

False.

Pelosi told us on Sep 24th that Trump interfered in an election by investigating Biden, and opened an illegal impeachment inquiry.

Trump declassified the transcript a Democrat had already leaked to Congress the day after.

I mean you can keep repeating yourself, but you're just solidifying how ridiculous it looks.

Unless you're saying Trump has a time-machine, which actually could explain a lot.

 

John Kelly: Vindman Was Right to Report Trump’s ‘Illegal Order’ on Ukraine

Right perhaps but not very smart. The last place a military officer should be involved is in politics. Just look at the pentagon.

 

Somehow I doubt Kelly encouraged Vindmann going outside his chain of command.

 

Kelly's opinion is just that, an opinion.

 

Sure.

This is just word games though, is my point.

It's like when they say stupid stuff like "75% of America thinks this should be a fair trial".

Someone probably asked him if people in the WH should report wrongdoing, to which anyone would answer "yeah".

I doubt the question was "Should Vindmann have gone outside his chain of command and leaked a classified phone call from the POTUS to a foreign leader in an attempt to impeach the POTUS".

 

Your terrible attempt at misdirection?

Fail.

I'll stick with General John Kelly. You stick with, well, whomever.

 

I've read his absurd "legal reasoning" while he's been whoring himself out.

So, yes. Yes, I do.

 

Wonderful umm.. Logic.. by discussing the topic i am using misdirection.. The projection is amusing!

John Kelly: Vindman Was Right to Report Trump’s ‘Illegal Order’ on Ukraine

What am i discussing? Vindman and this supposed illegal order..

But you do you... Good luck spamming the report button since yet again i am right.

 

There you go. Trump leaked his communications.

 

Where is that logic? I can't see to locate it in your posts about "the chain of command".

As an aside, does this super eeeevil chain of command "violation" by Vindman magically render his testimony not credible?

Why do you fellas ignore substance and focus on phony issues that have nothing to do with the facts?

 

You can keep claiming Pelosi didn't announce the impeachment inquiry before the transcript was declassified for the public if you'd like.

You're only making your own argument look even worse.

We both know why though.

 

Depends on who he shoots. Might even pick up some voters.

 

Oh I never said that Pelosi didn't announce the impeachment inquiry before the transcript was declassified.

I said that Pelosi did not leak the content of his conversation. That was Donald Trump.

 

Yep.

His latest is that Bonespurs could allow the Russians to invade Alaska, and that would not be impeachable.

 

What if he shot Putin?

 

What order?