a bloomberg/sanders ticket is very zionist, but it is not enough to beat the republican zionists the protestants prefer them to be in a more submissive and friendly position, such as son in law.
Your criminal IMPOTUS wannabe dictator was NOT democratically elected and won't be either. When the SCOTUS imposed the Bush/Cheney regime on the nation in 2000 I did NOT recognize junior as a legitimate POTUS. However he did win the PV in 2004 so at that point I did recognize him as the POTUS. For all the Crimes Against Humanity and the extreme HARM caused to We the People by the Bush/Cheney regime only the 2nd term was legitimate IMO. Your criminal IMPOTUS is NEVER going to win the PV because of what he is. The MAJORITY of the nation KNOWS that he is UNFIT for office. That is NOT suddenly going to change in the next 8 months.
You should be more cautious when predicting the future Anyway, do you think the 2nd Bush admin was more effective, less obstructed or otherwise benefitting in some objective way as a result of winning the PV? It just seems like there isn't much incentive to strategize a campaign with that goal in mind...
Just, wow...... You mean when they threw out the frivolous Democratic lawsuit? Nobody cares what you thought. Your party should win in a cakewalk, right?
My predictions are based upon TRENDS and IGNORING them won't make them disappear. The Bush/Cheney regime was a disaster from beginning to end. Junior was a PAWN of leaky Dick Cheney and everyone knew it just like your criminal IMPOTUS is Putin's pawn. What Bush/Cheney had going for them was their NEFARIOUS terrorizing of the electorate. It was probably one of the WORST regimes in the history of the nation. Only the current one manages to push it into 2nd place in that category.
Have bernie bots spent any time studying that '72 election? The one where Dems apparently lost their collective minds and threw another far-lefty against another loathsome republican incumbent. Let' just say things didn't go well for my beautiful Dems. Moral of that story … socialist Sanders is WAY TOO RISKY to nominate … and an almost certain LOSER in the general, if nominated. Hopefully Mike and the others on stage tonight really start hammering this message home to viewers and listeners...
I wouldn't bother dude, I'm pretty sure it's a fake account. They reported one of my posts which literally said 'Proverbs 8:5', talk about inconsequent. When they lose the argument, they report.
K... But what is the objective benefit to winning the PV? Why would any candidate campaign to win it over the EC?
Meaning, I don't believe they actually believe what they write. It's a troll account, the writing style is almost unhinged.
Perhaps you might prefer the term "mandate" instead but it comes down to the same thing. If you have a MAJORITY of the electorate that means that your political opposition has LESS leverage. The promises you made on the campaign where liked by a MAJORITY of the electorate.
Ah. I get accused of that as well on occassion. I tend to think the partisan divide and indeed a divide in the very perceptions of reality itself in political terms is just so vast between some folks that presumption of trolling is just easier to swallow.
But a percieved mandate is useless unless you get the lawful mandate of winning the EC. Suppose the 'impossible' happens and Trump wins both in 2020. Do you think it'll be any easier for the Trump admin to impliment policy?
Note to Mr T legal: Every republican I know is voting in the Democrat primaries and all are throwing the switch for Komrad Bernie.