Circumcision is immoral

They did it to me and now at 44...I feel very little sensitivity
The foreskin contains all the rich nerves and by removing it ..your penis is a stump
They also remove all ridge bands and frenulum
So basically you get a stump for life

It’s such a disgusting practice and should be outlawed
My brother ( who is a DR.) even did it to all his sons

 

Am I angry ?
Yes but I am 44 and it’s , “spilled milk “

 

I think circumcision is immoral on children, on adults, I don't support it, but it's their personnal choices.

But hoping to ban circumcision on children with the jewish and muslim lobby seems quite hopeless.

 

I think you must be 21 to decide yourself

I feel like I have a caterpillar lol

 

Me poor member....

 

18 is fine, if you can decide to go your skinned holed in the army, maybe you can decide to remove some skin.

I notice there is a rising number of men protesting against circumcision, maybe things will change.

 

I am Jewish
Still they ruined me
It’s hard to maintain !!

I guess that’s why I rarely date

 

I rather do MMA !!!

I have talked to my mom about this a few times and it was akward as hell but we had lengthy talks and she apologized and I accepted but I never blamed her

 

Did you saw a doctor about that ? Maybe the rabbi messed up the operation. I know it anyway lead to a lot of loss of sensations but sometimes the operation is ill realized and it can lead to painfull sensations.

 

No ..the operation was done by a pediatric surgeon
They did it 100 percent correctly

Now rabbis have been known to screw up

 

The foreskin has all the corpuscle nerves

 

Women are usually the driving forces behind circumcision and FGM.

 

She said she was just doing what other Jews did and she had no idea the loss of sensitivity
I said I dont blame you..
I am not a kid , anymore. Yes the foreskin looks very gross to women but it has all the feel. I never knew this until several years ago.

However, if I had a child .. I would never do this crap.
My damn brother did it to his sons and I tried everything to stop him and we did not talk for several weeks.

 

On occasion a Rabbi will screw up and severe it and its loss for good.
This happens more than you think.
They used the clamp on me and I can still see the Brown rings from the clamp of death when I Was maybe 8 days old.
What a way to welcome your first son lol

 

In most cases it doesn't negatively effect sexual pleasure. But even when done 'correctly', it still can, as everyones anatomy is a bit different. The bottom line in that there is no objective benefit to it in a civilized society where bathing and medicine are readily available, and IMO that makes the admittedly small risk of negative side effects of the precedure still unjustifiably risky.

I agree that it should be illegal to perform on minors.

 

I am also Jewish. I am also disabled -- I have Autism and Depression and no job.

I am 100% against outlawing Jewish and Muslim religious practice. This reminds me of Spanish Inquisition when Judaism and Islam were outlawed.

 

No one wants to outlaw it. Just restrict a potentially disabling practice to consenting adults.

 

YES until age 21 only !!!!!
And they must receive information about the dense nerve fibers that are gone lol

 

Lol. This affected your dating ?

Stop showing them your stump!

That may be the problem!
Look at the positives . No stinky smegma if you miss a bath plus you can last longer in intercourse! !

And you have a cleaner wiener!

That foreskin aint all its cracked up to be .

 

I Also have some minor mental problems

 

There is a funny story in the Bible about circumcision. Paul had to circumcise Timothy, the son of a Jewish mother and a Greek father (Acts 16:1-3). So part of the ritual is that the guy who does it has to suck the bloody wound. Paul ended up giving Timothy some head as a medical treatment. Anyway, it seems that the practice was that when a stranger, such as Timothy, met new Jews that he had to whip out his penis to show them that he was one of them and could be trusted to join the clique. Too bad they didn't have a secret handshake.

Peter was a big fan of circumcision but Paul said to hell with that because he was through sucking and his argument carried the day, which is why Christian men no longer have to be circumcised to join the Christian cult.

 

Circumcision programs in Africa helped to reduce the spread of AIDS. Outside that context I don't care either way, but I'm from a generation when circumcision was done almost as a matter of course (and not at the behest of women as best I'm aware, but thanks for slipping some casual misogyny into the most male subject imaginable) and we all seem to have managed just fine. That isn't a pro or anti, just a corrective to the 'disfigurement' narrative.

If you have the time to obsess about the outcome of a successful circumcision I envy you the luxury and pity you your choices. I choose to worry about things I have some say over.

 

I don’t ever think about it that much except when I take a shower

 

Have you forgotten about Zipporah and the stone she used to whack off her son's foreskin in Genesis 4:24-26? How would you have liked to have that dingbat as your mother?

 

I stopped confusing fairy tales with reality before I hit puberty, so I don't see what relevance this has to pretty much anything, let alone this thread.