Trump will be Re-elected

And not one question about Bernie's child sex fetish.

 

Saying he's a traitor requires what traitorous thing he did with credible links. No doubt we'll disagree on the credibility of the links but that gives us a starting point.

To simply say he's a traitor or a he's a racist, or he's whatever without being able to provide specific actions, words, or behaviors that he's taken to back up your claim is generalization and unsupported.

 

Who care if anything is paid for. Just use the Trump model and run up the national debt. Just use it this time to help the middle class instead of the rich.

 

That was Trump bursting into teenage pageant dressing rooms. You have your candidates confused.

 

Funny how nobody can actually site Trump accomplishments just supposed things to happen in the future.

 

on Trump debating a Bernie or Trump re-election?

 

What I responded to was this:

So again, what stakes are you offering?

 

Let's start with the 60 top accomplishments - which is only a partial list. The first 5 are quoted below. For forum rules compliance, you'll have to follow the link to see the rest of this list.

 

That is very funny, the idea that Trump would be afraid to debate Bernie. His comment made me literally laugh out loud.

 

Funny isn’t

So far those are all due to Obama. Not one economic metric can you find that has changed slope or direction since Trump took office.

And manufacturing n America is in a recession despite Trump’s promises and tax cut that was supposed to bring manufacturing back to America.

And GDP growth which measures the total economy is below 2% despite Trump’s promise of 4%.

 

actually Trump never debates anyone. His Alzheimer’s is so advanced that he is unable to remember anything unless it is on a teleprompter. What he can do is call names like a six year old but debating facts never.

 

For real, Trump would be looking forward to it.

 

That's not what happened. At all. Perhaps instead of repeating bumper sticker mantra, you could cite to some source?

1. The tax cuts didn't work. Instead, they blew up the budget deficit:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/christ...ts-didnt-work-the-data-prove-it/#2e913ad658c1

2. Deregulation had not boosted the economy:

https://www.newsweek.com/trumps-bonfire-regulations-boosting-economic-growth-805318

But what has been the economic impact? To arrive at some answers, Goldman tries three different approaches:

First, the bank asked its analysts what they are seeing on the ground. And so far not much: "Today, our equity analysts in non-financial sectors report that deregulation has largely taken a back seat to tax reform and has had only a modest impact on economic decisions so far."

Second, the bank looked at whether job growth and capital spending have been stronger in sectors and companies that were more highly regulated before the election. Goldman: "We find no evidence that employment or capital spending accelerated more after the election in areas where regulatory burdens are higher."

Third, to try and get a more forward-looking view of deregulation — hey, it's only been a year — Goldman looked at stock market performance. But not much there, either: "We find a roughly 0 correlation between regulatory burdens and post-election returns among the full set of S&P 500 companies, consistent with our earlier results based on macroeconomic data."

3. Manufacturing jobs? *LOL*

https://www.washingtonpost.com/busi...-manufacturing-now-its-decline-what-happened/

But this year, manufacturing has turned south and entered what Federal Reserve data show is a technical recession, or six-month slump. It seems unlikely to recover in the near future: A major survey of U.S. manufacturing purchasing managers found a negative outlook, and the other is just a whisker away from going negative for the first time since 2009.

 

I've noticed many left wing posters here display similar behavior. I think they learn it from the news personalities on MSNBC and CNN.

 

After the last democrat debate I think its pretty clear that Trump would eat any of their lunches on the debate stage. As far as his re-election chances go I don't think he's got anything to worry about from the dem field in 2020. I've never seen a more extreme group of incompetents in a political contest. Bloomberg is the only one with a prayer of beating Trump and that is a hail mary long shot of last resort - he has zero delegates and he wont get the nomination.

 

~ Sad but true ...

 

you must live in a cave.

 

That kinda mess reminds me of flat earth believers and Space deniers...

They ask for evidence of either or both

Show then a picture of the globe Earth from space and they will just say “CGI”

Some people don’t want evidence they just want to be right.

 

And I’m a Astro fan (I know I know..) so the more orange the better!

And yes they cheated. And yes they suck for doing it. Just to save y’all the effort!

But the Yankees still suck!!

 

I've noticed the opposite. Posters who are not trumpers tend to do research, and cite to that research when making arguments here.

 

We must be reading different threads. Ninety percent of what I see are variations on "Orange Man Bad" and suggestions that Trump supporters are idiots.

 

Or, worse yet, they cite to some goofy-assed webpage created for his campaign, giving him "credit" for things that he's had nothing to do with.

Check post #263, in which the facts destroy the nonsensical claims.

 

I have:

 

Where did that Levant fella run off to?

 

You must be viewing this thread through an interesting filter.