Tracking the COVID-19-Virus in Germany, the USA, Italy and other hot spots in the world

Discussion in 'Coronavirus (COVID-19) News' started by Statistikhengst, Mar 14, 2020.

PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening. We urge you to seek reliable alternate sources to verify information you read in this forum.

Tags:
  1. Adfundum

    Adfundum Moderator Staff Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2018
    Messages:
    7,697
    Likes Received:
    4,178
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    In what way would it be beneficial? I can see that as important at some future point, but as for statistics showing how the virus is spreading and even how efforts to contain are working, I don't see how removing the "preconditions" group benefits any of that.
     
    Derideo_Te and MrTLegal like this.
  2. Adfundum

    Adfundum Moderator Staff Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2018
    Messages:
    7,697
    Likes Received:
    4,178
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    And exactly the point of all those scary predictions. Let's hope our efforts make a mockery of those graphs. I do believe we will learn a lot from this experience.
     
  3. LoneStarGal

    LoneStarGal Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2019
    Messages:
    15,050
    Likes Received:
    18,807
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Just a note on the beds needed on the model. Those are beds on the model are predicted as needed for COVID patients not counting beds for non-COVID patients.

    In that case, if the prediction for New York is correct, then most of the beds would be full of COVID patients, leaving very few for anyone else.

    So there's that.... :confused:

    I'm waiting impatiently to see how the models update today after no updates since Wednesday.
     
    MrTLegal likes this.
  4. LoneStarGal

    LoneStarGal Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2019
    Messages:
    15,050
    Likes Received:
    18,807
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well, if we don't, at least we'll have more beds and ventilators. o_O
     
  5. Sallyally

    Sallyally Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2017
    Messages:
    15,851
    Likes Received:
    28,276
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Someone mentioned a decrease in car accidents. I wonder if the slack in this sort of emergency is being taking up by domestic violence, alcohol or drug related incidents?
     
    Derideo_Te, MrTLegal and LoneStarGal like this.
  6. LoneStarGal

    LoneStarGal Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2019
    Messages:
    15,050
    Likes Received:
    18,807
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Another Times Square shot....

    [​IMG]
     
    Sallyally likes this.
  7. LoneStarGal

    LoneStarGal Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2019
    Messages:
    15,050
    Likes Received:
    18,807
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes. That's been mentioned (and asked by reporters) in the daily briefings, as well as depression.

    There's more "love" with some couples getting to stay home from work and there's more "hate" with other couples being forced to stay home from work. I can imagine the number of children in the house and not in school would also impact family tranquility (or angst).
     
    Derideo_Te, MrTLegal and Sallyally like this.
  8. Adfundum

    Adfundum Moderator Staff Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2018
    Messages:
    7,697
    Likes Received:
    4,178
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    OH! Now that's some sarcasm!
     
    LoneStarGal likes this.
  9. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,324
    Likes Received:
    8,771
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Who is removing anything ?? I’m saying that the preconditions group should be defined and quantified by the fatality data so as to inform those in those groups that they are at elevated risk. That would save lives. And would be easy to do.
     
  10. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,324
    Likes Received:
    8,771
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Plus the capability of teachers to detect possible child abuse is now missing. I saw a survey yesterday which indicated that 40% of those asked were experiencing higher levels of anxiety.
     
    LoneStarGal likes this.
  11. Adfundum

    Adfundum Moderator Staff Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2018
    Messages:
    7,697
    Likes Received:
    4,178
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Maybe "separating" rather than "removing" would have been a better word. But as I said, those folks in the elevated groups are already well aware of the risks. No need to spend much time educating them on that.

    Which age group of people has the highest rate of infection?
     
  12. Curious Always

    Curious Always Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2016
    Messages:
    16,925
    Likes Received:
    13,463
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    [​IMG]
     
    LoneStarGal likes this.
  13. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,324
    Likes Received:
    8,771
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Why assume that ?? And if the percentage is as high as it is in Italy that would be alarming in a good way.

    Older people. But a greater percentage of older people have serious preconditions.
     
  14. Statistikhengst

    Statistikhengst Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2015
    Messages:
    16,805
    Likes Received:
    19,361
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male

    Very soon, models will no longer be needed. Soon, the battle of COVID-2020 begins.
     
  15. Statistikhengst

    Statistikhengst Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2015
    Messages:
    16,805
    Likes Received:
    19,361
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    With 2 hours left in my day, here a sure sign that curve is picking up again (unfortunately). This morning my time, around 08:30, we crossed over the 1.1 million line and we are now only 7,000 COVID-cases away from the 1.2 million line. Today, there have already been +97,611 new cases. Most likely we will set another horrifying record and for the first time, go over 100,000 new verified COVID-19 cases in one day. Right now, it's stands at 1,192,618 cases.

    The growth rate, right now, is already larger than it was yesterday:

    2020-04-004 COVID-19 MOD 002.png
     
    Last edited: Apr 4, 2020
    Derideo_Te, MrTLegal and bx4 like this.
  16. Statistikhengst

    Statistikhengst Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2015
    Messages:
    16,805
    Likes Received:
    19,361
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    For the first time since COVID-19 has attacked our world, we just literally, in this moment, crossed over +100,000 confirmed COVID-19 cases in just one day's time. With 19 minutes left to go in my day, you will see the numbers in my report. Folks, we just entered 6-digit territory in daily new cases, unfortunately, exactly as I predicted (more than once right here on this thread) would happen.
     
    Last edited: Apr 4, 2020
  17. Statistikhengst

    Statistikhengst Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2015
    Messages:
    16,805
    Likes Received:
    19,361
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male

    *1,196,097*
    +101,090 cases today over yesterday

    So, at end of my day, 11:57 PM on April 4th, 2020 (GMT +2), the COVID-19 numbers:


    2020-04-004 COVID-19 EOD 001.png

    Today, we came in less than 4,000 cases under the 1.2 million mark. Just this morning, we blew past the 1.1 million mark itself. The day before, we sprang over the 1 million mark. For the first time, we added 100,000+ confirmed COVID-19 cases in just one day. That is more cases than the entire total that was recorded every day up to March 6th, 2020.

    This morning, we crossed over, unfortunately, 60,000 deaths. More details below.

    One hopeful sign is that the mortality rate might not be rising very much any more. Today it landed at 5.40% (It was 5.37% yesterday at EOD). But one single day does not make a trend.

    The Excel-Table back to 02/27 (you will notice, the table now fills up the entire screenshot, soon I will need 2 to cover the table):

    2020-04-004 COVID-19 EOD 002.png


    In the raw numbers, there were considerably more new cases today over yesterday (+101,090) as compared to yesterday over the day before (+85,280). Four days in a row, the % growth rate decreased. However, today, it increased again, to +9.23%. An increase in the growth rate speeds up the exponentiality of the curve.

    In terms of deaths: 64,546 total, +5,760 today over yesterday, making for a 9.80% growth rate (yesterday: 11.22%), is possibly a positive sign because the growth rate went down some. Wait and see if it becomes a trend.

    The % of recovered people actually ticked downward somewhat, from 20.83% yesterday to 20.58% at EOD today.

    And per country, most of the countries, first per total cases, in descending numerical order:

    2020-04-004 COVID-19 EOD 003.png
    2020-04-004 COVID-19 EOD 004.png
    2020-04-004 COVID-19 EOD 005.png
    2020-04-004 COVID-19 EOD 006.png


    There are now 57 nations in the "thousand club", with Egypt and Estonia crossing over the 1,000 line today. Of those 57, 17 are in the "10,000 club" and 3 of them are at 100,000 or more (USA, Italy, Spain). Germany will very likely cross over the 100,000 line by then end of day tomorrow (Sunday). Slovenia, New Zealand, Morroco, Iraq and Hong Kong are up next to cross the 1,000 line, either tomorrow or Friday.

    And here, per new deaths today, in descending numerical order. France and the USA had the most deaths today:


    2020-04-004 COVID-19 EOD 007.png

    At the end of the day, France reported 1,053 deaths just for today. France also went over 1,000 yesterday and the day before, but the report was that a goodly amount of that was deaths from days previous from retirement homes that had not been reported yet. It remains to be seen whether that is also the case today. The USA, with 973 deaths, was the nation with the second most misery today. Surely by the end of the day in the USA, that number will once again go over 1,000.

    Soon, we will be jumping by considerably more than 100,000 cases and more than 10,000 deaths per day. WE MUST FLATTEN THE CURVE.

    -Stat
     
    Last edited: Apr 4, 2020
  18. gnoib

    gnoib Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2019
    Messages:
    5,457
    Likes Received:
    4,083
    Trophy Points:
    113
  19. Sallyally

    Sallyally Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2017
    Messages:
    15,851
    Likes Received:
    28,276
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Derideo_Te likes this.
  20. gnoib

    gnoib Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2019
    Messages:
    5,457
    Likes Received:
    4,083
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The most important thing I took out of this write up, how early they developed a c19 test and now ready they were with testing when the crap hit the fan.
    And how rapidly they increase their hard core ICU beds and they already had a lot of them.
     
    Sallyally and Derideo_Te like this.
  21. nobodyspecific

    nobodyspecific Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2011
    Messages:
    567
    Likes Received:
    746
    Trophy Points:
    93
    The explosion in new cases vs yesterday are almost entirely made up with the revision of France's numbers yesterday (after both our posts):

    apr-4-france-newcases.png

    From Worldometers:

    So the additional deaths from retirement homes were captured in your stats last night, but not the new cases. Hence the jump today. Not that 80K+ new infections even without that is any better a sign. It is annoying that France's release of this data in mass dumps mucks up ongoing analysis, but will all even out in the end.
     
    Last edited: Apr 4, 2020
    Derideo_Te, bigfella and MrTLegal like this.
  22. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    ...Still....waiting....
     
    LoneStarGal likes this.
  23. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    How does it save lives?
     
  24. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,324
    Likes Received:
    8,771
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Those with the high risk pre conditions groups informed by the granulated fatality data would take extraordinary actions to self isolate and sanitize thus saving lives.
     
    Last edited: Apr 4, 2020
  25. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Theoretically, but wouldn't that marginal benefit get negated by those without high risk pre-conditions engaging in ordinary (i.e. risky) behavior that would make it more likely to spread the virus even to those who are taking extraordinary steps to self-isolate and sanitize?
     
    LoneStarGal likes this.

Share This Page