Subsaharan African Average IQ - a global, undeniable phenomenon

What have I said that wasn't true? You have yet to deny any of the facts. It doesn't seem to me extreme to characterize European colonialism or de jure segregation as White Supremacist.

How would you characterize it?

 

You should seriously do some research regarding the continent of Africa (look into what was formerly called "western Africa") before you limit it's cultural history to just 400 years and a myopic view of parts of it's populations deemed "primitive". IQ is relative to environment, culture, etc. As one poster said here previously, take the so called superior, higher IQ Caucasian from Europe or North America..place them in various parts of Africa with NO technical assistance and without guidance/assistance from the locals, and see that disaster unfold.

 

Essentially, you're just ignoring the points I put forth that alter your myopic viewpoint of history and regurgitating your previous assertions. You need to re-read carefully and comprehensively what I previously wrote, because you're asking a question that's already been answered....and you need to stop treating your opinion, supposition and conjecture as fact, because just with my simple analysis your not standing up to the light of day.

 

Your anecdote lacks sufficient substantive data and is therefore meaningless given that there is no indication that those high IQ's arose from the demographic that is malnourished.

 

All that you just proved is that the whites spread their destruction of the environment everywhere they go.

 

History told us blacks could not be soldiers. They were not smart enough. They became very good soldiers. Just ask Black Jack Pershing. They said blacks could not fly aircraft in battle. They just weren't smart enough. They said blacks could not be Quarterbacks. They just weren't smart enough. Need I say more?

 

you ever see those Lipizzaner stallions? From Portugal, the Lipizzaner stallions. The most highly trained horses in the world. Their training program is simplicity itself. Simple matter of voltage.

 

Yes, and sadly, there are other people in the world that think just like you. When blacks entered the army they couldn't be officers. They just weren't smart enough. They also couldn't be doctors, lawyers, and many other skilled professions. You can't judge a book by its cover.

 

that flies in the face of 2000 years of evolution, it is mostly genetic and partly environmental.

whites generally are smarter because they have adapted longer to colder climates, which require higher survival measures.

hotter climates are easier to survive in because they do hunter gatherer.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunter-gatherer

 

Source? India generally is not very high, although they do produce a lot of good
mathematicians and programmers.

That's certainly true.

 

Man, what kind of history are YOU reading (or more to the point, NOT reading). African kingdoms came and went LONG before those in Europe....that included amazing standing armies.....the tale of Hannibal immediately comes to mind. https://worldhistory.us/ancient-history/general-hannibal-barca-was-a-black-african.php

https://www.history.com/news/7-influential-african-empires

I agree with your other assertions and statements, I just wanted to clear up some of what you said.

 

https://originalpeople.org/ishango-bone-worlds-oldest-math-tool/

It takes a civilization to use mathematics and discover prime numbers and given that these tools PREDATE all European civilizations by at least 10,000 years it is clear that Africa was civilized long before the Johnny-come-lately white civilizations.