US election: Trump tells North Carolina voters to vote twice

I haven't misrepresented your claim at all. See my post above. We know mail-vote fraud DOES happen, lol. Liberals say it's not widespread, but can't prove the claim.

The liberal argument is wrong for the same reason that me saying, "I've never broken the speed limit because I've never gotten a speeding ticket" is wrong, lol.

Really bad logic. And completely unconvincing.

 

Quote me ever saying it hasn't ever happened. If you can't, then you can (hopefully) figure out how you've misrepresented my claim. I've already corrected this. Please read.

If you are going to claim it is widespread, you have the burden of proof. You can't satisfy that burden of proof. I've already pointed out the problem with this fake argument as well. Can you prove Trump doesn't eat orphans?

I really can't understand what is supposed to be difficult to understand about the above. Let me know what I can explain.

 

to Try to cause longer lines, Trump wants less people to be able to vote, he believes the less people that vote, the higher the chance of him winning

 

Your rage over this is making you irrational. Disagreement with him don't prove agreement with him.

 

Most states doing mass mail-in voting have online tracking. In those cases, there's no reason to go to a polling station to ask if your vote has been tabulated.

 

We have evidence that it's not very secure. We don't have to argue that it's widespread. Just that it isn't secure. And stupid to foist it on the country with less than three months to go before a major election.

What's difficult to understand is why liberals ignore voter fraud and want to use inaccurate voter roles to conduct a national election when it has major flaws. Unless, of course, they plan on cheating nationwide instead of merely in some states.

 

What claim of voter fraud do you have about Oregon and Washington? Or are you deflecting because of having no actual argument?

 

Not really.

You have no evidence for your claim.

Again, totes adorbes. Let me know when you are willing and able to have an honest conversation. If that continues to be too much to ask for . . . well, can't say I'll be surprised.

 

Do you object to voter fraud being intercepted and eliminated according to existing law? It sounds like you do!!

 

LOL, yes we do.

https://www.dailysignal.com/2020/04...wn-out-because-of-fraudulent-mail-in-ballots/

 

No, why would I?

The problem is there isn't a way to catch it in ALL circumstances. So your point is irrelevant. Not sure what you're trying to argue here.

 

No, you don't. None of these are evidence of widespread voter fraud, especially in a Presidential election which . . . and I can't believe I have to explain this . . . involves many, many more votes. Please tell me I'm not going to have to read your own article for you.

 

I said forcing mail in ballots, not forcing people to vote by mail. I believe CA is one of the 9 states sending mail in ballots to those who did not request one.

 

Terrorism is not rare. It's been going on everyday in Portland Oregon for 99 days straight. And democrats are promoting it.

Keeping on the subject of voting, fraud is so rare that it couldn't possibly effect the outcome of and election. I say the President's advice is good. Make sure your vote counts by doing whatever is necessary. Why are democrats suppressing people's right to vote? What are democrats afraid of? Why don't they want more access to voting? Why don't they want to count every vote and determine the intent of the voter?

 

So then if people vote in person and electronic voting machines are programmed to flip votes to republican votes, and to delete votes cast by every 10th democratic voter, but it can't be proven because there is no audit trail, you should be completely against voting in person too until a reliable audit trail is established, right? I mean come on, be consistent.

 

Terrorism is quite rare. Trump is doing a metric **** ton more to try to suppress voting than any Democrat is.

 

I gave the 22-year history of vote-by-mail in Oregon and Washington. Let's see you FIND (not "invent") any failure in our system. If you can't, then all your objection is spurious and based on false, invented fantasies.

 

Have you seen the polls that show Biden ahead? That is a massive voter suppression effort by the democrats.

 

AND IN EVERY OTHER CITY IN AMERICA!!! Just ask any black person what they feel when they find a cop car tailgating them with lights flashing and sirens blaring. They will tell you "terror". Cops are today's terrorists for blacks! And as you said, it goes on every day!

 

Polls showing that Biden is ahead have nothing to do with voter suppression. Polling isn't voting. The only candidate I've seen fighting for fewer votes is Trump.

 

You can't have it both ways. If you have an issue with his comment, you are admitting you share his concerns. If you trust the system, you should have no issue with his comment.

 

This, likewise, just isn't true. You can trust the system and still have problems with his comment. Just because you are confident that a crime will be caught does not mean that you are okay with promoting said crime. Surely all functioning adults understand this.

 

LEO's are terrorists?

This is why Democrats & Biden will lose.

 

Every time The Trumpocity says something like an ass would say his cult followers claims that he was joking.

They probably say that he was only joking when he said that military people who die in the service to their country are "suckers and losers".


That is so funny I am Falling Down Laughing My Butt Off...
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/20...ead-us-soldiers-suckers-losers-report-claims/

 

Well Biden has told several of his rally/events attendees not to vote for him. He also said that if you are black and you don't vote for him you're not allowed to vote.