I was right when I said that Navalny is a traitor to his country and should be jailed. As for Berlin, they have yet to provide any evidence to back that Navalny was poisoned. Instead Merkel came out with: "It's a military secret" - something that's very reminiscent of Obama's 'trust me'. Moscow is very secretive and rarely reveals Intelligence, but after Navalny told Der Spiegel that: “Putin is behind the crime and “I don’t have any other version of what happened, ”Russian Presidential Spokesman Dmitry Peskov came out with: “This is not (a) patient who works with the Western special services — (it is) the Western special services who work with him, this is a more precise wording. Yes, we do have such information, I can even be more specific: CIA staffers are working with him today. It is not the first time that he receives different instructions,” Peskov told reporters. If one takes into account Navalny's friendship with George Soros, and that both Soros and the CIA have been heavily involved in the same government NGO's, then it would only stand to reason that Navalny would get his directives from the CIA. For Peskov to come out with it though, means it's the end of Navalny's career. I don't think he would return to Russia knowing he could be arrested as a traitor. I find his eyes very scary. Is he drugged? https://fort-russ.com/2020/10/kreml...works-with-navalny-sends-instructions-to-him/
Soros is at the top of my list and I doubt he's still working with the CIA since Trump was elected. The reason is the speed with which the EU pushed a vote (it was within a week or two of the incident, and while America have a lot of clout I believe Soros still has more when it comes to the EU). Also of course the confrontation with Turkey.... sanctions on Nordstream 2 would cut war funding for Russia CIA is only second on my list but I believe some Senators sent a letter shortly before the incident voicing against Nordstream 2... clearly they were suppose to look like the guilty party. Third is MI6 revenge porn Russia makes number four on my who dunnit Navalny list, if it was Russia Navalny would be a) dead and b) not poisoned with Novichok... that's like leaving a handwritten note next to the body, saying i did it... then signing your name
It seems Peskov provided the evidence like Merkel did. Both said things and showed nothing. Pick and choose.
So....Jenny, you have more solid proof that Navalnitchka is a CIA plant.....other than some garbage fort Russ article? Or is this some wild hallucinations on your part? Where's all those dozens of Moskalis warships in the Mediterranean not far from Syria? Your posting about fell flat like the Hindenburg crash of 37. Yes another BS posting by the delusional Kremlin Jenny?) Where's those vids of nation wide riots in Ukraine Jenny....credible ones, not RU crappers?
I don't know if the members of the EU are on Soros payroll, or if they just agree with his liberal one world ideology. Russia has war funding. Putin has prepared the country for everything. I think stopping Nordstream 2 is to force the EU to buy American gas at a higher price, while at the same time, we're buying Russian LNG gas at a lower price - believe it or not. I read that Washington wants to stop Turk stream from going through Bulgaria again - yet the money Bulgaria will get as a transit nation is desperately needed. Outside of Ukraine, it is the poorest country in Europe. Washington did it before to Bulgaria. They stopped the pipeline and it cost them about 60 thousand jobs, and billions in transit fees. I can't understand it, if you want nations to stop something, then give them a better deal, don't go around threatening them a-la mafia style. I thought about what Peskov said, which would literally ban Navalny from returning to Russia since he could be arrested and tried in court. That was probably the intent, and it would be worrying to Navalny. If he can't return to Russia, then he loses his money source. He doesn't realize that his backers want to stop financing him anyway, since he's been ineffective with the protests in the Far East, and in stopping the new constitution from being passed. I think Navalny was given something by his contacts to drop down his sugar level. Well today Navalny said he's suing Peskov for saying that he's directed by the CIA, and if he has something then he should prove it. Navalny's lawyers are taking it to a specific court in Moscow. I assume it's in a Western leaning area. In the meantime, Navalny can accuse Vladimir Putin of poisoning him when Berlin has never shown any proof of poisoning, and when the doctors in Omsk literally saved his life. Personally, I believe the Kremlin does have information about Navalny taking advice from the CIA. The only reason Navalny wasn't arrested was so they could find out who his contacts were. So will the Kremlin reveal their sources to prove the CIA is working with Navalny or not? Maybe Putin should pass a law that a person can't be sued unless they are present at the trial. That way Navalny would have to risk going back to Russia and being arrested. Let's see what happens?
Provide the concrete evidence Navalny is a CIA asset....otherwise you're blowing smoke out your ass!)
Nope....when I start a thread, I provide the link. This thread is speculative....no evidence of genuine relations between Navalny and CIA.
I agree with Peskov... I just don't believe since Trump came into office, Soros (suspect number one) is still working with the CIA.... Navalny's masters are as divided as America. Soros funded the People's War in South Africa, he's funding the People's War in America... along with a whole string of other radical projects. If Soros is still working with the CIA then you can pick any of the following statements as my thoughts on that "thick as a brick" "own goal" "shooting yourself in the foot" "stupid is as stupid dos" Could Navalny be working with both... sure
Oh, yes, he will return. To save his family/relatives/friends from torture/death. Russia isn't known for its big-heart/weakness towards prosecuting rogue intelligence threats.
You might be right, Soros' name hasn't come up that much in foreign affairs except in Macedonia where they were holding up signs saying 'Soros out'. His Open Society Foundation was supporting 40 organization there. I think he was funding the protests in Hong Kong - or at least partially. What I couldn't understand is why Hong Kong didn't ban all the NGO's a few years back during the first protests? They always think they can control them until it's too late. Didn't they realize what it would lead to? As for Navalny's masters being divided, I'm not too sure. Navalny's liberal and very Western oriented. I'm sure the seminar he attended is at least partly funded by Soros. Also Khodorovsky always had hopes of taking over Russia so I'm sure he's supporting Navalny as well. Their big problem would be the new constitution that was voted in recently. Navalny didn't manage to keep it from passing. The Constitution doesn't allow anyone with a dual citizenship or that hasn't lived in Russia for 30 consecutive years to hold office. It also upholds many of the conservative Russian traditions. This means that all the Russians living in the US and Israel (about 30% are Russian), and who are under liberal western influence cannot hold a high government office - with the exception maybe of Navalny. The new constitution from the little I read, also doesn't allow any republic to break away. I read something about a major insurrection somewhere in the Far East that was very disturbing to Moscow. It seems very coincidental that Navalny would be coming from there. So If navalny failed to stop the new constitution from being voted in, and failed in breaking up the Federation with the insurrection, then Soros, Khodorovsky and the CIA would have no more use for him. He would be worth more to them dead than alive. Anyway these are my conclusions from the bits and pieces I came across, but I might be wrong.
You can say that what Peskov said is speculative, the same as Merkel saying Navalny was poisoned as being speculative since Berlin provided no evidence. But Peskov saying what he did is not speculative. He did say it, and that is what the title of the thread is referring to.
According to Tass, Russian commentators believe that the government is doing everything to keep Navalny from returning to Russia after he told Speigel Vladimir Putin poisoned him. There are two charges now that the Kremlin has against him, one is libel against the President, and the other is Treason. Some say Treason might be hard to hold since Navalny doesn't have access to government secrets. I don't think so. I think there are other treasonous acts. Anyway one thing is certain, no one in Russia will want to have contact with him knowing he might be connected to foreign Intelligence Services. Navalny will probably have to stay in Germany. To be honest, I'm wondering if it was all a set up by Navalny's backers, and he was told to say Putin poisoned him so he couldn't go back to Russia and he'd be off their payroll. I wouldn't put anything past them. Let's just say morality and loyalty is not their forte.
He's not a traitor who fights against an oppressor (Pootin in this case). Navalny is a true Russian patriot.
Well, it's a little hot, but then again I am further south. (My apologies to William Shakespeare) To reason or not to reason that is the question? How can'st one reason where knowledge is not, when reasoning itself requires a lot - Jeannette
Oh, then the person voted into office is the oppressor. I get it now, how could I have been so stupid. Whatever's false some say it's true so they can throw it back to you. And what is right they'll tell you wrong. Then woe to all, it won't be long. When everyone will wear a frown. For what is 'up', they'll call it 'down'. And try to make the day a night so dark can reign, without the light. - Jeannette
Russia's Foreign Minister Lavrov said that the doctors in Omsk did not find any traces of chemical warfare agents, nor did the doctors at the Charite clinic. It was supposedly found later in the Bundeswehr's clinic which of course makes it suspect. If they are telling the truth, then it had to have been planted later. "Doctors in Omsk did not find any traces of chemical warfare agents, they honestly said this. But I would like to draw your attention that the fact that Charite clinic also did not find any toxic substances in its analyses; instead, they were 'found' later in the Bundeswehr's clinic," Lavrov said, speaking to members of the Association of European Businesses in Russia on Monday.
Oh, and I thought Assad was protecting Christians and minorities. But look, if you say he was the one beheading them, and it was not the terrorists and those who supported them, well then who am I to say differently? YEAH! YEAH! YEAH! YEAH! Some thinkest others not too bright so falsity must rule. But thinking thus is but a blight that makest them the fool - Jeannette
In the same interview where Navalny accused Vladimir Putin of poisoning him with no substantiating proof - and thereby committing a treasonous act, Germany's ex Chancellor Schroeder is filing a defamation lawsuit against Bild. This is what Navalny had said: "Schroeder is Putin's errand boy. It's one thing to be a Putin lobbyist. But now he [Schroeder]'s trying to protect murderers", Navalny asserted, adding at the same time that he had no proof to confirm his allegations about "cover payments" to the ex-German Chancellor. This came on the heels of Gerhard Schroeder's rejection of Alexei Navalny's alleged poisoning, since no proof was presented. The latest is that the Charite Hospital, like the hospital in Omsk, said they had found no sign of poisoning. But proof or no proof, don't think there isn't a plan behind the insanity? The false insinuations are a brain washing means to deceive the American public, in what is known as our foreign policy of 'Strategic Ambiguity'. I'm singing now a wondrous song To tell the world that right is wrong and what you thought was naught before was just a lie that you had bought - from us. - Jeannette
