Smoking-gun email reveals how Hunter Biden introduced Ukrainian businessman to VP dad

Hunter Biden does not appear to be the "kiddie porn" type, and he is obviously not shy about his, excuse the expression, preferences.

The "kiddie porn" nonsense looks like a Biden defense team generated distraction

 

I've heard of emails saying that you love to kick puppies. And you haven't denied them. Therefore, you are clearly a puppy-kicker.

 

It's the Epstein offense.

 

Wrong. The correct analogy would be "I have emails where you express that you love kicking puppies. And you haven't denied those emails where you in your own words state that you love kicking puppies."

 

Hey folks gather round the Cracker Barrel for a good heaping helping of right wing hatred and pot shots at minorities.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Post

“In 2009, the Post ran a cartoon by Sean Delonas of a white police officer saying to another white police officer who has just shot a chimpanzee on the street: "They'll have to find someone else to write the next stimulus bill." The cartoon dually referred to President Obama and to the recent rampage of Travis, a former chimpanzee actor. It was criticized as racist,[81] with civil rights activist Al Sharpton calling the cartoon "troubling at best given the historic racist attacks of African-Americans as being synonymous with monkeys."[82] The Post defended itself by stating that the cartoon was deliberately misinterpreted by its critics.[83]”

“In several stories on the day of the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing, the Post inaccurately reported that twelve people had died, and that a Saudi national had been taken into custody as a suspect, which was denied by Boston Police.[68][69] Three days later, on April 18, the Post featured a full-page cover photo of two young men at the Boston marathon with the headline "Bag Men" (a term that implies criminality) and erroneously claiming they were being sought by police.[69][70][71] The men, Salaheddin Barhoum and Yassine Zaimi, were not considered suspects, and the Post was heavily criticized for the apparent accusation.[70][72] Then-editor Col Allan defended the story, saying they had not referred to the men as "suspects".[70][73] The two men later sued the Post for libel,[74][75][76] and the suit was settled in 2014 on undisclosed terms.[77][78][79]”

 

Well the only real connection is the FBI agent. For all we know he no longer works such cases. I admit it's a bit of speculation, but it's speculation based on evidence.

 

Yes, the OP is fake news. So glad we agree.

 

Aye and that's generally waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay more 'evidence' than all the anonymous sourced accusations against Trump.

 

Weird . . . I don't recall ANYONE on the Political Left being that generous in regards to the possibile validity -- or lack thereof -- of the Russia supplied dossier on Trump as filtered through Hillary Clinton. Gosh! They seemed eager to accept that as holy writ without doing any vetting of it whatsoever.

 

Ouch! Now that's going to leave a political mark.

 

It was the computer repair shops property. Yes, you’ve read that right.

 

The dossier wasn't filtered through Clinton. And I saw healthy criticism of it in the left; I certainly didn't see anyone treating it as "holy writ." I honestly can't think of anyone who seriously immediately jumped to the conclusion that the pee pee tape was real. Hey, you wouldn't be throwing out accusations of hypocrisy just to excuse your own, would you?

 

Hillary paid for the dossier and as for criticism, the collective political Left treated it as if it were a Holy Bible that they actually believed in.

 

First some conservatives paid for research. Then they stopped. Then the dems paid for the same research. Then they stopped, too. After that, Steele completed the dossier, and he handed over to the FBI. Clinton didn't "filter" it. And whatever you want to believe, but I didn't see people treating it as "holy." Every leftist I talked to had at least some skeptical reservation about it.

Hey, you wouldn't be throwing out accusations of hypocrisy just to excuse your own, would you?

 

Keeping in mind that, due to the redacted info, we don't even know that this was for the laptop in question, and keeping in mind the strange additional assumptions such a speculation requires, it's still a pretty shaky speculation.

 

So your "evidence" is still pdfs for which Giuliani is the only source? Gorgeous.

 

1) Makes the most sense of the 3.
2) Rudy has a copy of the hard drive, and your proposal only works if someone knew about supposed kiddie porn before contacting the FBI, seeing as your evidence is that a kiddie porn specialist was assigned to the case before the FBI demanded the laptop.
3) Completely unbelievable.

 

Hunter Biden's attorney inadvertently admitted that the laptop did in fact belong to Hunter.

So the New York Post has verified information that they obtained legally.

This story is not going away because some of the e-mails clearly show that Joe Biden rec'd money from Hunter's exploits.

 

Source? Not seeing you are wrong, but I haven't seen anything showing the attorney admitting that the laptop is legit.

 

Sorry, but you're a little late to the dance here. I've already included debunking links, I think it was in post #661.

 

Google is protecting Biden, but the AP version of Daily Mail - UK has the information.

 

Do you have a link?

 

Admissions against interest are always especially credible. The NYP is being aggressively censored for defying the corrupt ruling political class.
Heroic courage is required for any business to tell the truth about Biden while he is the DP's presidential candidate.

Read it while you still can.

NEW YORK POST, NEWS EXCLUSIVE, Smoking-gun email reveals how Hunter Biden introduced Ukrainian businessman to VP dad, By Emma-Jo Morris and Gabrielle Fonrouge,October 14, 2020.
https://nypost.com/2020/10/14/email-reveals-how-hunter-biden-introduced-ukrainian-biz-man-to-dad/

 

That was a major legal blunder, but in fairness to Biden's lawyers, they know that it is useless to deny the authenticity of Hunters laptop. It's got his personal signatures/stains all over it.

 

No, it's because one of the FBI agents on the case investigates child pornography. Makes sense, no?