Again (copy-paste from my post at http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?goto/post&id=1072139350#post-1072139350 for more information): Any alien who is physically present in the United States or who arrives in the United States (whether or not at a designated port of arrival and including an alien who is brought to the United States after having been interdicted in international or United States waters), irrespective of such alien’s status, may apply for asylum Now go away. Your denial of reality is sign that a serious debate is not possible with you.
In your mind, "liberate" is violence. In the minds of those forced to live under the despicable Whitmer, it is a rallying-cry against oppressive leftist overreach.
Apparently, in your mind, "oppressive leftist overreach" equates to common sense measures used to fight the spread of a deadly pathogen.
Whitmer's unconstitutional lockdown orders were overturned by the state supreme court, so she instantly used the state health department to mount a different way to keep us locked-in. She sent squads of state troopers to close down a 77-year-old barber for refusing to shut down. Karl Manke became a statewide hero who now can breathe a bit easier after charges were dropped due to the court decision. Whitmer is out of control and must be recalled from office for abuse of executive power.
You act as if we are to placidly accept whatever a tyrant leftist hag might dictate. I will not surrender.
To be precise, the state SC ruled a law that gave her emergency powers was unconstitutional. So, she was following the law until the court ruling. I hope the justices don't lose any sleep knowing they are responsible for the deaths of hundreds of residents of Michigan and neighboring states.
You quoted nothing without links. And which state's law (or U.S. law) do you refer to? Come on, Perry Mason, make your case. No, you haven't.
Talk to the families of elderly forced by Whitmer into nursing homes. And by what possible stretch of the imagination can Michigan judges be held responsible for anything in another state?
'It's just plain false.' State did not order nursing homes to take COVID-19 patients, Whitmer says https://www.wxyz.com/news/coronavir...-homes-to-take-covid-19-patients-whitmer-says Perhaps you are unaware the virus is not confined by state's borders.
That's her claim, to the single most liberal "mainstream" news outlet in Michigan. Time will tell. Enough people want her gone. If proof exists it will surface.
Bingo! What did you expect it to go to? You made a statement. Were you hoping I do all your research for you? I don't do that. Not my job. Read my sig! You mean the law that I quoted and you ignored... You haven't even read the law. You haven't even read my quote of the law! One can't hope to find anything more ridiculous than that.
Funny stuff. Liberals who repeatedly admit they are not lawyers but then repeatedly insist we believe them.
Wait......what? You wrote........."Talk to the families of elderly forced by Whitmer into nursing homes." You made an unequivocal assertion. Now you don't even know if there is any proof of it? In light of this I'm sure you can understand why there is no reason to believe anything you write is true.
I never believed anything from the left, here, so you can drop the condescension any time. She claimed she did not order elderly into nursing homes. I say she did, based on the number of elderly in my county who had that happen. And no, I refuse to identify where I live. Gretchen Whitmer needs to be legally recalled from office by the swiftest possible means.
What condescension? I simply pointed out you made an assertion about Whitmer's actions only to write, "If proof exists it will surface." You do understand one typically waits for proof before asserting something is true...........unless you are Trump or one of The Following. I'm waiting for you to retract your erroneous remark.
I have relatives working at one of my county's largest facilities. They and an independent third woman I know has also confirmed they saw elderly moved in. I will not retract the truthful statement. I contend proof exists and will surface.
What I think doesn't matter. What matters is what his extreme right-wing terrorist supporters think. (if you can call what right-wing extremists do "thinking") You have made my point. Kidnapping the governor because you don't agree with her is not peaceful protesting. And the asterisk President* failure to clearly and explicitly denouncing groups that do things like this is a clear endorsement and a definite indication of what his tweet meant.
