QAnon Are Not Crazy Conspiracy Theorists

Every time the media talks about QAnon they refer to some fringe theory about Democrats as cannibalistic pedophiles. That's not what QAnon believes. Is Pelosi a cannibal? Metaphorically yes but realistically unknown.

QAnon is about questioning the official story. Maybe the official story will turn out to be true, but don't take it at face value. Do your research. It's about addressing the very real issue of child trafficking. Are all Democrats pedo? No. Are most? No. Are some? Yes. Expose them, take them down, and save the children.

 

QAnon are the Flat Earthers of politics. Nothing more.

 

Save the Children ...

 

How do you know, given the "Anon" part? Ultimately the label is like "Anonymous", just something any kook or troll on the internet can choose to hang their personal opinions on. The true intentions of the person or people who started it remain a mystery (assuming they had any concrete intentions at all).

 

I read these theories and it makes me sad

sad that people believe stuff like this just because a crazy person puts it on the internet

BUT

what has been proven a FACT and not a theory??

the catholic church have been protecting pedophiles for centuries ...

and nobody seems worry that 7 of the 9 members of the SCOTUS are catholic ..

 

From everything I've read and heard about them, which is quite a bit, the central part of the QAnon conspiracy is that the democrats are led by a secret cabal of pedophiles, which includes every high-up member of the party (the Clintons, Obamas, Pelosi, Schumer, etc) and Hollywood elites (Tom Hanks and Rita Wilson, for instance). Also, that they use their positions to further the cabal and gain access to more children. And, most importantly, that they are in league with the "deep state" to bring down Trump because he became president specifically to take down that cabal. The "cannibal" part seems to be a significant part of it, though it's not necessarily believed by everyone. It definitely isn't metaphorical, though. Look up "frazzle drip" to get an idea of just how seriously much of the Q following group takes it. They believe there's a video of Hillary Clinton literally taking the facial skin off of a baby and eating it. Some even claim to have seen it. (Don't worry. It doesn't exist, so there's no risk of accidentally seeing something so horrific if you search for it.)

Anyway, all of that stems from the "Q drops" and breadcrumbs that are "baked" by followers. Some of those "drops" absolutely refer to cannibal pedophiles, so claiming it's not part of QAnon is a bit like claiming stuff the pope says isn't part of Catholicism.

That said, they are definitely using the "save the children" idea to rope in new people, to the point that those who believe the cannibal pedophile cabal idea might be outnumbered by boomers, teens with poor critical thinking skills, and bored thirty- and forty-somethings who get dragged along by other family members.

 

Nothing to bee seen here Obama pushed for grown men in dresses in little girls bathrooms

Nothing to be seen here in california they want it to make legal of butt sex of little boys

What theory's are false? That california is trying to make it not a felony to have butt sex with little boys ?

That's true

 

I thought for sure this thread would get to the second page before someone repeated this idiotic BS. You've exceeded my expectations.

 

Every wacky theory has some truth behind it.

Prove it false, once again california is trying to make it not a FELONY to have butt sex with little boys

 

Just one question...

For all the Q-man talk about child trafficking and "save the children," please tell us, with supporting evidence, exactly how many children has Q-anon saved.

 

"Pedophiles exist" is the only evidenced-supported truth behind this conspiracy theory.

In California, the laws defining statutory rape have an exception for people within a certain age of each other. I think it's 3 years, but I might be mistaken. So a 16 year old boy can't go to jail for having sex with his 13 year old girlfriend. That exception specifies hetero-normative sex, though. As such, a 16 year old boy could go to jail for having sex with his 13 year old boyfriend. That's what they're trying to change. The change would not allow, for instance, a 20+ year old person of any gender to have any kind of sex with a minor of any gender.

 

Yeah they are trying to change butt sex with little boys doesn't automatically qualify to be put on the sex offender list, which is bull crap.

 

A writing style can be somewhat like a fingerprint........
a lot like a fingerprint........

In my twenty or so years of being rather addicted to some variation of internet discussion forums... (beginning way back with yahoo groups and ezboard .....
I have never seen anybody write quite like our buddy from the forum AboveAlpha ..... UNTIL......






QAnon... who could it be?

sOMEBODY over at QAnon is not a perfect speller.... but they are obviously brllliant... and they use CAPITOL letters EFFECTIVELY!



I tried my best to convince ABOVEALPHA to go up against Hillary and Bernie early in 2015...... I really did try.......



Should AboveAlpha allow us to set him up for the office of POTUS as early as 2016?

 

Are all Republicans pedo? No. Are most? No. Are some? Yes. Expose them, take them down, and save the children. Here is a partial list:
https://www.broadwayworld.com/board/readmessage.php?thread=946300&boardid=2

 

Only if the offender is also a little boy.

 

Every time I see that picture, I think it's Francis BETO O'Rourke. Have to do a double-take, but the resemblance is striking in that still. LOL

And on topic, I haven't really read much about Q.

 

You must not be familiar with CA law. This state has prosecuted quite vigorously anything that violates this. The "sexual predator list" is pretty bad, especially when you consider that you could be brought up sexual predator type charges quite easily. For example, if you publicly urinate within 250 yards of a school (regardless of time of day or if school is in session), you could be brought up on charges of indecent exposure and forced to register as a sex offender. I have no clue whether the new law would address that particular scenario, but yes, many teenage Romeo & Juliets can be relieved by this new law.

 

And you

This is the thing, first you normalize gay marriage, then you try to normalize butt sex with underage boys. It's right out of Alinskys play book rules for radicals




1. “Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.” Power is derived from 2 main sources – money and people. “Have-Nots” must build power from flesh and blood.
2. “Never go outside the expertise of your people.” It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone.
3. “Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy.” Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty.
4. “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.” If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules.
5. “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions.
6. “A good tactic is one your people enjoy.” They’ll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. They’re doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones.
7. “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.” Don’t become old news.
8. “Keep the pressure on. Never let up.” Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new.
9. “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.” Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist.
10. “The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition.” It is this unceasing pressure that results in the reactions from the opposition that are essential for the success of the campaign.
11. “If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.” Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog.
12. “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.” Never let the enemy score points because you’re caught without a solution to the problem.
13. “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions.

 

Oh, I see. You and the Q folks seem to have a lot in common. I'll let you get back to your manifesto.

 

You mean Romeo and little Romeo

To hear them say it, it's about equality of the law, well to us normal people it's all about baby steps to get what they are really after, just like with letting illegals vote in school elections, just baby steps to make full blown illegals being able to vote in national elections

 

Actually - yes- Republicans have butt sex with little boys:
https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc...1BsxC_5uH8h1BBA4EGyqP_VMsrx7lSvoPX9Njjvt0oHK0

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/18/us/dennis-hastert-released.html

https://www.cincinnati.com/story/ne...ced-today-more-drama-could-get-way/577947002/

http://lanternproject.org.uk/librar...nty-commissioner-admits-sexual-abuse-of-girl/

And there is much more.

 

Thats only if you believe that everything that us fed to you by government and government media is factual and complete.

I dont believe it is.

 

I never said there wasn't, I am talking writing laws one step at a time to make it full blown legal.

 

Very well done!

That's a great impression of a QAnon follower.

 

No I research the topics sorry if your just partisan.