Media question to Biden:

I deny that anything coming from the Trump camp has any credibility anymore. Or even deserves the least bit of attention. All one has to do is look at past record: Hillary-gate, Benghazi-gate, Obama-gate, Dossier-gate, FISA-gate, ... and on and on.... All of them ended up being declared "no wrongdoing" by Republican investigators.

How many conspiracy theories do you think even the most gullible American can ascribe to before they start realizing that it's all one big joke? I think Republicans used them up a long time ago.

 

And in October right before the elections. Such a coincidence!

You guys know you're wasting your time, right? Republicans used up their share of conspiracy theories about 4 conspiracies ago. All Democrats have to do now is let the Republican conspiracy-theory record speak for itself.

If you don't know you're wasting your time, keep wasting it. Myself... I think I'll just use it for it's comedic value from now on, but nothing more.

 

You should ask the owner of the shop who turned over copies of the hard drive.

 

I stand corrected, I agree, letting 4 Americans die and doing NOTHING at all to help is not a real scandal at all, then covering it up and lying about it. You are right.
The IRS having 406 right leaning applications linger while slowing down 6 left leaning ones, is not a real scandal at all. I am so stupid.
Giving $500,000,000 to Solyndra knowing full well they would still declare bankruptcy is not a real scandal, damn I am bad at math.
Supplying Drug Cartels with thousands of weapons and those weapons being used to kill thousands of Mexicans and one US border guard is not a real scandal.
Spying on Journalist, not at all a scandal, what was I thinking
Paying off Iran and straight up guaranteeing them a nuclear bomb is certainly not a scandal at all, again I must be crazy.
Allowing service members to die in the VA and turning a blind eye to the problem is certainly not a scandal.

I need to start thinking like a democrat, life is so much more simple that way.

 

I can't. I don't speak Russian.

 

Prove he is Russian.

 

Is this an example of the scientific method? Your knowledge of science is severely lacking.

 

How about the antennas of the Biden's unequivocally declaring that it is not Hunter's computer and the emails are fake?

 

Oh.... You shouldn't be so hard on yourself. I don't think you're stupid. Gullible, maybe. But definitely not stupid.

I mean believing that the IRS doing their job is a "scandal" is not something I would expect of anybody who is used to looking at things rationally. Or, at least, considering that 501c4 is a designation for organizations dedicated to promoting social welfare, which is something right-wingers are not quite known for being too fund of. The IRS should be suspicious of companies that used terms like "Tea Party" or "Conservative Patriots"... etc, as part of their name would apply for such classification.

Or, for that matter, an informed person who realizes, first that Obama had nothing to do with the death of four Americans, and second that Republicans... let me emphasize that so you don't miss it.... REPUBLICANS.... who investigated the matter in ten different investigations, including one of the longest congressional investigations in our history, exonerated.... so you don't miss that one either.... EXONERATED... the State Department and everybody involved in any wrongdoing.
https://apnews.com/article/ecc3a300383445d5a90dd6ca764c9e15

I could go down the list but, maybe it would be good practice for you to research your talking points, instead of just copy-pasting them from your favorite right wingnut websites.

I leave you with the most important piece of advice I can give you READ MY SIG (hope you don't miss it). You see... assuming that I don't do research before I post (like you did here) has been the demise (intellectually speaking, of course) to many right wingers here.

Good luck!

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir_Putin

 

More of your scientific method?

 

Exactly!

 

"FBI and DOJ do not believe Hunter Biden laptop part of Russian disinformation campaign"
"Separately, Langille tweeted that Fox News anchor Martha MacCallum "is told by a Federal Law Enforcement Official that the emails are 'authentic.' And that the laptop may have not been looked at right away when it was received.""
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...aptop-part-of-russian-disinformation-campaign

The noose tightens.

 

That is so funny....

You quote a wingnut rag that quotes a Fox producer who quotes another Fox producer quoting himself quoting an "anonymous informant" who, somehow, at some point in the "broken telephone" chain turns into Ratcliffe .

That is just hilarious!

Look... Just to be clear. I don't care! Nobody gives a crap! This is strictly for Trump loyalist consumption. Trump is worried that his own supporters won't show up at the polls. So he needs to find something... anything... to motivate them. All you need to do is show up at your voting place and the purpose of all of this will be accomplish. There is no need for Trump loyalists to embarrass themselves with yet another Trump "lock 'em up" scheme.

Clear?

 

No one else is laughing. Especially the Biden camp.

 

So much for "the validity of my arguments," as you immodestly claim in your self-aggrandizing condescending footer text. Malignant bias prevents clearheaded analysis. You've failed to convince anyone of anything except your hatred of a man you do not know nor will probably ever meet.

 

Every day before the election must now seem like Chinese water torture to them. Goody!

 

He's been identified as John Paul Mac Isaac, owner of "The Mac Shop." He turned the PC over to Delaware police who in turn gave it to the FBI.

https://www.newsweek.com/hunter-bidens-laptop-probe-referred-fbi-delaware-state-police-say-1540818

It also turns out that this 2019 case was already in motion for what the FBI's own filing system indicates is a money-laundering case. This link is loaded with detail.

https://www.citizenfreepress.com/br...-laptop-linked-to-fbi-money-laundering-probe/

Chanel Rio at OAN says several reporters there have viewed the photographs, and have identified Hunter Biden's niece in the photos. Here's their message....

Emails, lewd photos, text messages — it's the smoking gun scandal the Biden campaign & its media lapdogs are doing everything to squash. Join @ChanelRion to learn more about what was found on Hunter Biden's laptop. Plus, an exclusive sit-down with @RudyGiuliani. #OANN pic.twitter.com/deW4twWx89

— One America News (@OANN) October 21, 2020​

Fun times for all. It may not be the October Surprise we expected, but it's entertaining nonetheless.

 

I am not the topic of this thread. So all those comments about me, and none about what I say is a clear indication that I convinced YOU.

 

Either it's questions about milk shakes or "Mr. Biden, do you think Trump stopped beating his wife?"

 

I make no claims as you do in your footer. My posts speak for themselves but allow others to draw their own conclusions rather than gullibly swallow the incredible. In this specific case, your own words condemned you. I did not attack, I merely quoted.

 

Now, then! Who's the first left winger here to address Hunter Biden being FBI-investigated for money-laundering...and the logic involved?

Laundered from whom to whom? Was Joe Biden at the wrong end of that funnel?

 

This thread is not about you. Nor is it about me. Do you have something to say about the topic? No? Of course you don't!

They sure do! My point is made.

 

My point will be finalized the night Trump is declared clear winner of the 2020 presidential election.

Biden's a sacrificial candidate and Harris has been nearly invisible in a patently empty attempt to campaign. The Biden crowds can fit in the back of a pickup truck and yard signs are as scarce as Hollywood integrity. Just as it was in 2016, the polls were wildly off in favor of they who lost the race. So much for polls.

If it can be proved Biden received money from people buying access through Hunter, does Biden deserve to be elected? Can any ethical voter say yes, knowing the White House was so blatantly for sale?

 

I think I might have been one of the first. Back in April. Here
http://www.politicalforum.com/index...mo-only-this-we.570966/page-5#post-1071592744