I don't know what the guy's daily life is like....maybe he got sick, maybe his wife got sick, maybe his kid....maybe he got busy with other jobs...maybe at first he didn't realize what he was looking at, who knows. All that is important is that he did the right thing in the end...and now we have all these emails that appear to outline the criminal activites of Big Guy Biden
I guess if you want to go down some crazy conspiracy theory....I guess the it's Russian disinformation blew up in your face, so you got to move on to this Rudy created the emails to put on Biden's computer narrative now... Either way....law enforcement will figure it out....they got the computer as part of their money laundering investigation into the Bidens
It's not like we don't know that crazy Rudy was right in the middle of this or that we weren't aware of him waving "e-mails" around that a Russian agent gave him
Have any other repair shops come forward claiming Hunter Biden brought computers for repair? I find the whole premise highly suspect. We're to believe that Hunter Biden, international gangster wheeler dealer, passing billions back and forth, involved in companies everywhere, doesn't have an IT guy at his disposal. The thread title is spot on.
what Russian Agent? Rudy certainly was on top of this....he is well aware that the FBI is investigating the Bidens for money laundering....and now we all are aware of it
Yeh that would make sense of these people were “commoners” but they weren’t — millions were seized in fraudulent transactions. You could have reduced your post down to “la la la”, “fake nuze” and “deep state”
It's not even a smear, the Trump Campaign couldn't have thought of this. It was information, evidence, that could've been subpoena'd at the Senate Trial(again, if Schiff were unbiased) or if Joe Biden were transparent instead of lying saying he never talked to his son about the business, but it looks like not only did he talk to his son about the business, but he was the main beneficiary OF their business. Talk about political corruption, at its highest levels. Say what you will about the Trump children, but as far as we know, Trump doesn't necessarily need the money coming from Ivanka's jewelry line for example. It'll be interesting if Joe wins and there are more scandals in a Joe Presidency, and remember at that time orange man bad is gone and we can't blame that on him then. This is why vetting is important.
Hold on. Trump had his own witnesses and Schiff isn't in the Senate. What by george are you talking about?
Don't insulate the Manafort case to the entirety of the investigation(although Democrats have done that to make it look better), it doesn't look better. The FBI literally has a financial division(hell the IRS's sole purpose is REVENUE). We did not need Special Counsel Mueller to prosecute Paul Manafort. Or any of the identity theft cases. The investigation was not only a dud, it was detracted from its main point. They told us there were Russies, they told us there was blackmail on the President. Turns out(obviously) there was none of that, and the FBI is disgraced for all time for that. Wee, let's go chasing rumors! Comey should be ashamed as director that it happened under his watch.
Trump didn't have his own witnesses, in fact the House Republicans weren't allowed to call their witnesses(including, wanting the whistleblower to testify). Have we forgotten the charade already?(For good reason.). Investigating these matters, they said was used for his political office(ROFL) I want anyone to try saying that with a straight face, knowing what we know now because it's absolutely hilarious. Any candidate should be vetted, Donald Trump did the DNC's job for it. Which speaks poorly to the Democratic National Committee. This shouldn't have gotten by them or the intelligence community, but it did.
Who was ‘individual one’ in the report I wonder? With trump limiting the scope and interfering in every aspect of the investigation I am surprised they got as far as they did from the Republican prosecution. I bet we will hear who that person was in the coming presidential investigations. Obstruction should always be considered the strongest form of evidence.
The Senate. I'm talking about the Senate. Why didn't Trump have Mitch McConnell mention this then? Because it's not real, obviously.
Robert Mueller testified that he wasn't obstructed in his investigation. He said that...UNDER OATH. If those idiots even try using those "10 instances", Trump's lawyers will instantly use Mueller's own words, against...his report. But Robert Mueller isn't the only one who testified that there wasn't obstruction Former #2 of the FBI, Mr.McCabe said "It's simply not possible to stop the people in the FBI from doing the right thing"(ROFL, barf while reading that.). The only thing Trump limited, was a look into his finances relating to the Special Counsel but that holds far less relevance than you think, because the IRS again, has these files.(The House is trying to get them now, and I wish them a good luck because they're not going to get it.) You might get something out of New York it looks like, but it won't be as comprehensive as you'd like. However, if financial crimes were committed by Donald Trump, the IRS would've been on it. Hell, the FTC(although that does deal more with stocks and trades) has been a beast when it comes to financial irregularities. You think Trump is the invisible man that can't be touched, but that's not the reality. The reality is, if there were a crime, they would've found it, indicted it(at the very least, kept it under seal) and any other excuses contrary are just that: Excuses. That the Mueller team tried to use the OLC as a cover for their inability to find a crime is absolutely hilarious.
It didn't start in 2017. So you'll be OK if Trump's son's and daughter start selling access to their father and giving him a cut?
Trump has no secret Chinese bank account. His hotel management company did to PAY taxes TO China for business they did BEFORE he was elected. Biden and his family were GETTING money getting paid BY CHINA. You can't make that intellectual difference?
I wasn't trying to change your mind. If you support this stuff, enjoy your Hunter Biden investigation. Your reply implies I support Trump. I would be embarrassed to have a D or an R by my name.
That's the only time any involvement from Joe is mentioned. 1) There is no evidence that anyone was selling "access" to Biden while he was in office. 2) You mean like the times they did exactly that? No, I'm not okay with the fact that they did that. But it is a fact that they did so and it is not a fact that the Bidens did so.
The director of the DNI said it was the FBI said it had nothing further to add. "Two senior administration officials told Fox News that the FBI has the recovered laptop, and that while the Bureau declined to confirm or deny whether an investigation was taking place, officials at the FBI and the Justice Department agree with Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe’s comments that the laptop is “not part of a Russian disinformation campaign.”" https://www.nationalreview.com/news/fbi-reportedly-in-possession-of-hunter-bidens-laptop/
Would that be Trump's FBI? Part of Trump's DOJ? Working for the Trump's lawyer, Barr? I've no reason to believe it and Biden has no reason to respond. Wallow in your own mess or, rather, Trump's mess.
Two unnamed sources and Ratcliffe who withheld the whistleblower report (illegally) that lead to Trump's Impeachment Oh...
NAMED sources one gave a briefing yesterday before the debate. He also voluntarily went to the FBI to show them what he has in evidence and give a full statement today. The MSM is hiding this from you I would advise you to watch FOX and read the WSJ and National Review and read the NY Post and get your facts straight and then make up your mind you are not operating with a full set of the facts. Did the Biden's issue a public denial it is Hunter's laptop and the emails are real?
