Without speculating on his guilt or innocence, should Crooked Donald.......

Mueller noted the OLC opinion as a rationale for not indicting Trump for the instances of obstruction he detailed in his report.

https://www.justice.gov/olc/opinion...enability-indictment-and-criminal-prosecution

 

You're right, it doesn't matter. Lots of VPs never ran for President in a primary, so that's kind of inane point to try and make.

And if you listened to Biden's speech last night, you really can't make a case to claim he is senile. Most of his gaffs are because of his stutter problem,
and after listening to Trump's word salad approach to the English language, it was refreshing to at least hear complete sentences.

 

My wife voted for her in the CO primary vote.

 

There's certainly no speculation on your part judging from the title of thread. The way I see it, Anti Trumpers will say yes, Pro Trumpers no, those who are neither just plain don't give a dang. Not giving a dang one way or the other is where I stand. Let the super charged partisans fight this out.

All I have to say is this mega, ultra, high partisanship, the polarization is destroying this country.

 

Calling him crooked is by definition speculating on his guilt.

Your op is an exercise is dishonesty and hypocrisy

 

Let's say Trump was just a regular citizen who had evidence emerge he may have committed a crime. Would you feel the same way?

 

Now that you have that off your chest, do you think he should be prosecuted if the evidence warrants it?

 

My reference to Don as being crooked is not a matter of speculation with regard to his crime involving his foundation. I make no assumptions about other crimes he may have committed. I just want to know, do you think he should be prosecuted if the evidence warrants it?

 

A candidate who drops out before voters get a say for her as PRESIDENT is NOT a good VP choice for any party. Not her gender, not her expressed opinions, but her credibility in thinking she was qualified to be President and showing she was not by withdrawing before Dems had a say.

Someone here asked where were all the threads that supported Joe Biden's policies rather than hurl sophomoric abuse at Donald Trump.

I've been looking. The rabid clowns of the left didn't manage that. They were too busy flinging boogers.

 

Fantastic news! You'll have to excuse me but as an Australian keeping up with the micro-details of how the US political and justice system works would take an extra lifetime

 

There is no evidence whatsoever to even investigate.

SInce you abandoned the standard of not speculating it is fine to do so.

there fore the question is stupid and irrelevant

 

You sleaze without a link. Noted. Keep pluggin' away at it.

 

So is Dirty Donnie claiming victory and voter fraud. Speculating without evidence and being dishonest and hypocritical.

 

First presume guilt and then go seek whatever sticks to the wall you throw at it. It doesn't have to be true, just sound true enough to fool those who may not have an extra lifetime to keep up with a system not their own. This specifically includes U.S. Democrats and how they view a Constitution they intend to dump at their first opportunity.

 

I guess hatred has something to do with it

 

So?

This is not about Trump.

Try paying attentiion to the news. Trump will be gone in a few months he is already the past.

 

I always cringe a little when anyone from Australia makes that claim

 

Oh good, I thought Dirty Donnie the Superspreader said he won and his faithful are backing him up.
I must have missed the memo when they all conceded.

 

I would not know as I have never been one of them.

EVery president gets criticism. Ex presidents are irrelevant

 

The truth is not biased.
I say let donald reap the consequences of his actions.
If he committed tax fraud, treat him like any other tax cheat.
If he committed sexual assaults, treat him like any other sexual predator.

 

How many states had her on their primary ballot? And why did she drop out of the presidential running if she did not believe she had no chance of winning overall party support? And yet without a single real vote cast to prove that, the party sidesteps and shoves her onto the ticket.

Choke. A bit obvious there, but a glorious way to get her into office and not even her own party can (or did) stop her. VPs are innocent as the driven snow in Greenland if they're Dems and world class monsters if they are moral Republicans like Pence. Welcome to the liberal fun-house. The mirrors are always cracked

 

Damn, Australians complaining about Trump being President of the United States and now he is defeated and we have a new President of the UNITED STATES and the Australians are still out to hang the EX-PRESIDENT of the UNITED STATES..

Clearly Australia provides little to no political venue

 

Why do libs think conservative would stoop to a liberal trick in exiting the White House? Typewriter keys missing. Drawers glued shut. Nasty memos posted. Vile slurs slung wide. Democrats showing themselves to be such empty angry people.

 

The afct that you used the word IF shows that the accusations are just speculation.

As opposed to truth

 

Then by God let's see leftists start posting it.

A Supreme Court defeat for John Roberts and the other liberals will do nicely. Overturn the PA swindle an d fix the software used in many Michigan counties which gave votes to Dems that were marked for the GOP.

https://nypost.com/2020/11/06/michigan-gop-claims-software-issue-undercounted-trump-votes/

Both true. Got proof, or merely smears?