USPS Whistle Blower "I Didn't Recant" - Coerced to Water Down My Story.

Yes, his credibility is crap. He said it, then he recanted, and then PV comes out to say he says its true.

And YES, Project Veritas is a joke. They were caught lying about their story on Planned Parenthood and have lost multiple lawsuits. And we wont even go into the millions they ave received from shadow companies (re: Republicans) to go after democratic leaning organizations. [/QUOTE]

Yeah, the guy (Hopkins) who started a go-fundme page that now has over $136,000 ? THAT GUY ?

All due respect, but you need to read up on O'Keefe. He lost the lawsuit with PP, but for his testimony he was given legal immunity by the California governor in return for the full tapes from the ACORN "investigation". If my memory serves me I am sure it was for ACORN.

 

Well now... AJ has pronounced this fakery. Gosh, what were the odds of that happening... Y'all heard him. "nothing to see" move along... LOL

AJ, the fact that you seriously think that folks will simply take your announcement as fact, well, that's optimistic..... LOL

 

Some of these "partisan hacks" are life long Republicans. Appointed by Republican Presidents for life judges. Republican Secretaries of State.

 

Project Veritas is not a joke, it is a risk to democracy and truth. Evil is a better word.

 

Well like we suspected, this guy is a liar.

If you have to pay someone to tell the truth, they are probably lying.

 

Just adding a link:
https://eu.goerie.com/story/news/po...d-nov-3-came-erie-postal-facility/6230622002/

He probably suddenly realized that the $25000 he received was not worth carrying on with the lying to court and now hopes that the court will be lenient to him.

 

I’d feel scared, too, if someone told me the consequences for electoral fraud while I was lying about election procedures.

 

Did you listen to the audio? They were super nice to him and just asked him what he really heard and to remove the embellishments that PV added.

And that was just from the Friday interview. He reached out to them on Sunday and totally recanted.

 

https://www.thedailybeast.com/usps-...as-penned-his-ballot-tampering-claim?ref=home

Whoops

 

It's being put to bed. No serious investigations have started because there's no reason to do so.

Someone claiming something happened isn't enough to prove voter fraud. Whistle blowers, just like the in Russia investigation, must come with corroborating evidence. One can sign an affidavit making any claim. Where's the evidence to back up his claims? If it's always out of reach, well that's true of all the people who claim 9/11 was an inside job, right? So at some point, it's a baseless claim. Most people are at that point. It's only Trump supporters who aren't. That's not our problem to solve.

 

Not a Trump supporter. I just want the irregularities looked at. For example why did Pennsylvania violate court orders to allow observers access to the ballots? These are things that need to be looked at and explained. Whether the end result is Biden or Trump, I don't care. We need to show that everything was on the up and up.

 

Which observers weren't allowed access? I haven't seen any evidence of that at all.

 

Observers were always there but allowed 4 feet closer than initially

 

They didn't. Observers from both parties were allowed. The issue was the they wanted to be six feet away instead of ten. Being four more feet away isn't going to matter. What I'm saying is all the so called irregularities come from people not want to accept their candidate lost. Every time they bring one up, there's evidence that bats it back down. That's why none of the court cases are sticking. Judges need evidence, not just affidavits or claims, but corroborating evidence.

And we don't really. The US election system is and has been on the up and up. If anything, it's up to the detractors to prove it's not. And they haven't.

 

Exactly.

You can't base a SERIOUS "claim" on:

"Something, something, some guy on the internet, Nessie signed an affidavit, something..."

Which, to your point, is exactly why ALL of these "cases" have been/will be LAUGHED out of Court.

 

In other words, you don't care one bit if democrats cheated, we get it.

 

You are correct...those ARE other words. Not mine. The ones that run through the heads of Trump supporters who can't seem to understand that not everyone in the world lives in the same crazy fantasy they do. The only words that matter are, Trump lost by the same election system he won by as did many other republicans, so you've got nothing to base your claims on. Because if one election is cheated, they all are. It's all done on the same ballot.