Barr authorizes Justice to probe 'substantial allegations' of voter fraud

And you're free to be in denial like Trump who's hiding in the White House and who lacks the guts to even mention the election. Trumps own people say he's through.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...tial-irregularities/ar-BB1aZLeD?ocid=msedgdhp
"Federal prosecutors assigned to monitor election malfeasance tell Barr they see no evidence of substantial irregularities"
"Sixteen assistant U.S. attorneys specially assigned to monitor malfeasance in the 2020 election urged Attorney General William P. Barr on Friday to rescind his recent memorandum allowing investigators to publicly pursue allegations of “vote tabulation irregularities” in certain cases before results are certified, saying they had not seen evidence of any substantial anomalies"
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------"
https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics...tory-trump-biden-burnett-opening-ebof-vpx.cnn
Most Secure ever:' Trump officials contradict his election claims"
'The Department of Homeland Security issued a statement saying the November 3rd, 2020, election was the most secure election in history. President Donald Trump continues to deny the results."

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...arr-s-policy-change/ar-BB1b00bg?ocid=msedgdhp

Federal prosecutors assigned to investigate election fraud denounce William Barr's policy change

 

You really do have a reading comprehension problem. You either have a subscription to the NYT website, or you have not read enough NYT articles to trigger their paywall requirement. I refuse to pay for information that should be available in the public domain for free. So, I can not read the article that makes it a paywall source and a violation of the Forum Rules.

Male bovine excrement!!!! There was no link, or source of any kind offered for the claim that you made. Now, either put up or shut up!!!! Show me your source that says that no one told the media and observers that they were going to shut down the count at 10:30 pm.

 

Maybe you have failed to notice that the Social Justice Progressive Justices are at a minimum at the SCOTUS currently. This will go to the SCOTUS, and will be heard. Just as it was in 2000. Just watch!!! I will revisit your post as soon as the SCOTUS accepts the cases!!!!!

 

It does not matter that both sides were barred. It violated the state's election laws for observers. Again, in Dallas, no one was allowed to observe in violation of state election laws.

I have proven that this happened. If you have a source that claims that this did not happen, please present it. You might also want to research why the Georgia Sec of State sent investigators to Fulton County Tabulation Center to rescan the votes, and why Georgia is starting a complete statewide recount today.

Of course, it sound nitpicky your a liberal Biden supporter. But ask yourself this. Does it sound anymore nitpicky then a fake Russian Collusion Investigation complete with fraudelant FISA warrants that everyone involved admitted they never should have been issued?

 

You just love parroting fake news don't you?

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/11/pre...orgia-announces-a-recount-as-biden-leads.html

 

Decides to "look at it", and then Rejects it Per Curiam?

That is possible.

The thing is, if it was a narrow issue that affected 537 votes (as in 2000) it might be worth the court's time.

BUT, if Trump thinks there is any chance that a decision would happen that would reverse Biden's Victory--Trump is Dreaming.

The WON'T Happen. Period.

 

No, he 100% nailed it...

You are just buying the spin version...

SNIP
State law requires an audit but leaves it up to the top elections official to choose the race. Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger said at a news conference that the presidential race makes the most sense.
ENDSNIP

https://apnews.com/article/georgia-audit-hand-tally-ballots-vote-8fa73ef353b36eddf14e1360eeecc22d

This might be the only time I agree with Brad Raffesperger, SOS of the State of George... Perform your audit AND shut up the Trumpies...

 

Looks like the Prosecutors Barr sent out have come back empty

SNIP
Prosecutors assigned to investigate baseless allegations of irregularities in vote tallies told Attorney General William Barr that they found no "substantial irregularities," The Washington Post reported.
ENDSNIP

https://www.yahoo.com/news/prosecutors-ag-bill-barr-dispatched-032953416.html

What's next? Find some different prosecutors?

 

It's only one vote, sure, but each singular vote makes up "the" vote.

A man living in Tennessee "voted" in Arizona and his signature was verified and vote counted.

The original source is Laura Ingraham's show. Video at link.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/news.yahoo.com/amphtml/tennessee-voter-claims-name-used-040737093.html

Here's a written account for those that don't want to click on the video.

A Tennessee resident has gone public after discovering that someone used his name to cast a mail-in ballot in Maricopa County, Arizona. The county claims that an audit of votes found no irregularities.

Nahshon Garrett told Fox News’ Laura Ingraham that he had received a call from a voter integrity group telling him a ballot using his name had been cast in Arizona, and that he should contact the organization if he did not vote in the state. As it turns out, Garrett, a professional wrestler, had moved to Tennessee to train for the Olympics. The athlete said that he left Arizona more than a year ago, and that he had cast his ballot in Tennessee.

Using Maricopa County’s online voter portal, Garrett confirmed that someone had submitted a ballot in Arizona that was “signature verified and counted.”

He said he had never requested an absentee or mail-in ballot from Arizona, and had “no idea” who used his name to cast a vote in the state.

https://www.rt.com/usa/506723-nahshon-garrett-vote-fraud-arizona-tennessee/

 

So what?

Isolated cases of that nature have always existed.

Nobody could possibly think that a handful of isolated cases means that there was "massive fraud".

Give me a break.

 

Assistant federal attorneys are the guys that do the actual work.

They report to their dept head, never to an AG like Barr.

All 16 that were assigned to the probe sent a signed letter to Barr telling him where to stick it.

 

Who did the vote go to? This is not evidence of fraud - having a few seconds to compare a signature or laziness is not fraud

 

Who the vote went to is not relevant. Whether fraud or error, this large-scale mail-in voting was ripe for things to go wrong. This is one instance of it.

 

There have always been errors whether the vote was done at the polling station or by mail.

Where is the evidence in this case anyway - how was the error discovered if the postal vote was incorrectly accepted and counted?

 

My post on this showed how it was discovered. Did you not read it/watch the video?

 

Ye I did. It does not say how the "voter integrity group" found a postal vote that was accepted and counted was an invalid ballot. This claim sounds BS

 

Meh... there are a million Nahshon Garretts out there... simple name duplication...

 

Totally, EB.

Nahshon Garret (and those just like him, involved in this Massive Campaign of Fraud across several states) voted Millions of Times.

I heard it from "some guy on the internet". Gotta be true.

 

The "voter integrity group" run by Pro-Trumpers are cold calling 1.5 million people who have moved state and asking them did they vote in both states. They have found one case of fraud that got through the checking procedure due to an obvious error in checking signature. It will go quiet in this example f the person is caught and is a Trump supporter

 

Justice department said they found nothing prosecutable.

 

But it will EXPLODE with a BOMBSHELL if the fraudster is a Biden supporter...

I just laugh that these individual 1-offs of voter fraud are getting caught (which is great, BTW), and the wingers are extrapolating that to mean there's enough fraud out there to overturn 38 electoral votes...

 

Who's extrapolating anything? Yes, what I posted is about 1 vote. The thing is, this election was quite different in the scale of mail-in ballots (about double that in 2016). The incumbent lost, which is somewhat rare. So a group is raising money and checking on these votes in some states. Who should have a problem with that? If nothing comes of it, at least going through this process should help to quell the "stop the steal" movement that is going on.

 

People are being harassed by these cold calls. One and a half Million people are to be telephoned and questioned as if they are guilty of election fraud