The Trump campaign attorney Sidney Powell claims that Trump "won by a landslide" and his legal team is "going to prove it." During a news conference Thursday, this lady claims electronic voting machines were programmed to change or remove votes for Trump. She went on to say that the Trump team has the evidence to prove it and would come forward with the evidence in about a week. I have seen this lady on TV and heard her on the radio and she seems credible. But I'll not hold my breath. In fact I find what she is saying is hard to believe. If she has the proof I want to see it now. A landslide??? She has put herself out there on the record and time will tell if she is a moron or not.
Fyi, there is a thread titled "Fox News: Sidney Powell refuses to show the evidence; interesting reading.
How about we look at the FACTS that we KNOW about HER? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sidney_Powell https://www.forbes.com/sites/joewal...-new-top-conspiracy-theorist/?sh=44e378881f9d NOTHING in the LEAST bit credible about a conspiracy whackadoodle.
None of these excellent lawyers are able to explain why Trump didn't do anything about these so-called frauds the whole time he was POTUS. It's been 4 years since he claims that the election will be rigged and he would have been too stupid to counter a scam that he himself denounced?
So it appears that not even the biggest LOSER*-in-Chief was prepared to put up with the crap being spewed by Sidney Powell. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/sidney-powell-twitter-reactions_n_5fbaeaa6c5b63d1b77045b42
She seems credible??? LOL, she is the nutjob who said that Hugo Chavez is behind this alleged widespread fraud (for which she presents no proof), apparently ignoring that Hugo Chavez died 7 years ago. By now, even the Trump campaign has washed hands from her, and YOU find her credible??? Incredible.
Ah, OK, sorry. Glad that you changed your mind. Like sometimes many do, I replied to the original post without reading the rest of the thread.
The sad thing is that the way cults go, Trump doesn't need any evidence. He can simply say it, and his gullible followers will believe that there was fraud. This is why there is such a striking difference between what is said on Twitter and crazy press conferences, and what is said by his lawyers in a court of law, because lying to a judge has legal consequences and carries a risk of debarment. So, they yell FRAUD where there is no consequence in doing so, but when a judge asks "are you saying that there was fraud?" the response from the lawyers has been, repeatedly, "no, your honor."
That's right. None of his lawyers dare to repeat under oath all the nonsense Trump tells on Twitter. And that's what's scariest about Trumpism: all he has to do is accuse, and his supporters will bring evidence later. It's high time for this to end.
