The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election

If the Senate convicts the impeached one, I would agree. Bu they won't. So no, they aren't making sure. In fact, they are still enticing outsiders with the actions.

It is sad the outside establishment failed. But the worst possible human was the experiment.
I would hope it gets tried again, but with a leader who is competent.

Congress has a 15% approval, but 90% incumbency rate.
That's who bad the system is set up against WE THE PEOPLE.

 

Which politicians? I need names, because a lot of the GOP was very pro-Trump since the GOP Base was very pro-Trump. Trump's tax cuts for the rich also seemed to benefit them more than the plans of Democrats, so why would they have Biden win.

 

Simple


Trump won
Lost !

Now More Than Ever​

 

So as most of you know, TIME recently published an article admitting to what we already knew: a shadow cabal rigged- I mean "fortified"- the election. Admitted in the article are things like "There was a conspiracy unfolding behind the scenes, one that both curtailed the protests and coordinated the resistance from CEOs" and "They got states to change voting systems and laws".

The question is, are we supposed to believe that they went that far, but DIDN'T rig the vote tally directly? It was already laughably apparent that chicanery was afoot when all the important swing states simultaneously quit counting and took two weeks to "count" 1% of the vote (while boarding up windows so no one could see). My guess is that they're going to wait until these aspects of the conspiracy are normalized, then they will start telling you how the votes were altered for your protection. You know, to save democracy.

https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/

 

Just quoting and replying to a TIME article, bud. The article literally says that there was a conspiracy.

 

There isn't a 'conspiracy forum'. There is a conspiracy theory forum, but this is no theory. Time has reported the conspiracy. It happened.

 

This is an excellent example of two parties reading the same article and getting completely different interpretations.

 

and it's moronic, and belongs in the conspiracy forum

 

no, this is a batshit crazy conspiracy theory, on par with flat earthers.

 

So now that you have posted your crackpot nonsense, here is what it really says.

Or the horror. Now get a life.

 

I agree that the Portrait of the left in this Article - "Blue coming to the rescue of our election" is - as you say "Moronic" .. not sure about the Conspiracy forum but definitely moronic.

 

that is a conspiracy theory, free and fair elections are only for countries America rebuilds.

 

free and fair elections favor the rich over the working classes in America.

 

Who asked them to "protect"...well...Anything? Who gave them this power? Did you vote for them? I know I didn't. Did the government hire them? Nope.

You don't find it the least bit concerning that a group of people formed a cabal working in the shadows (their words, not mine) in order to effect the election (like it or not "protecting" is still something that requires action which in turn has an effect) without anyone in government giving them the OK to do so? If you don't then put the shoe on the other foot and replace "protect" with "corrupt" because if this group can do this then it can be done the opposite way also.

 

Well thought out, highly intelligent, meticulously researched answer.
Just as I expected.

 

You agree with joke biden? To give illegals free health care, and charge the taxpayers for it?

 

It shoud be what to expect.
You believe conspiracy theories. Ask a simple direct yes or no question.
Get a yes or no answer.

 

We should give free health care to everyone. If I had my way we'd only bill people like yourself who want to charge poor people's relatives for the contingents of bird handlers necessary to chase the excess buzzards away from the piles of corpses outside the locked hospital doors

There shouldn't be illegals. The USA had pretty much open borders throughout the 19th century (and most of them were unskilled and/or sick as well.) We grew from nothing to the Great Power that decided the two worst wars in human history in that century and we did that by hosting the greatest human migration the world has ever seen.

So yeh, I agree with Biden and go him several better. Let everybody in and I'll pay for the dances where your daughter can get to meet her future Somali husband.

 

NO, it doesn't.

Molly Ball's piece does NOT say that.

 

From Molly Ball's piece:

Yes. It does.

 

Thanks, Kal.

I stand corrected.

In any event, any "conspiracy" is a GOOD "conspiracy" if it Helps MY side..

I can live with that sort of "conspiracy".

 

At least you admit it.

 

Of course "fair, free and uncorrupted" according to them(see: the now discredited Lincoln Project.) One recalls HRC saying "never concede" and well we can see why. The winners get to write history, but they don't get to interpret it. We all know what the "game" is now. And that cat is out of the bag, this article attempts to normalize it.

 

Even at the time when people were encouraged to come to the US and our laws were the most lax laws in the entire world and the only requisite to coming to the US was to be healthy ...they still recognized the difference between someone here legally and someone here illegally.

 

How did Biden get boosted from a third tier
candidate from the first primaries to . . . .

It's The Shadow campaign and $ $ $​