Saudi Arabia Is Scrubbing Hate Speech from School Books

Yes.. It's hard to choose between the Devil or the Angel of Death.

 

That was your beloved Islamic State that was tasting the barrel bombs .. and how are these different than other bombs .. just lost in a world of propaganda and drunk on necessary illusion you are.. desperate to apologize for beloved El Saud.

 

No I want a free and democratic Syria, you want Assad's dictatorship to survive. Hence we back the Syrian National Council and Syrian Democratic Forces who want the same. No say the word, say you want a free and democratic Syria and you don't support Assad.

 

As if. You would have been fine under Assad, if you just did not mingle with politics. Most people don't give a damn. The amount of votes casted in the US last elections were massive, but that was still around 60%. So you got 40% did not vote, about +30% voted Biden -30% voted Donald. And if you add the % of the Americans not illegible to vote... you be at maybe 20% of the population who voted on Biden. I can hear Assad saying Whooptido about this.

While ISIS, well their religious views entered their peoples personal space on a massive scale. The difference is quiet huge.

 

When Assad does it: pure evil.
When America does it on a massive scale: it's fine...




white privilege.....

 

Arabs are Not white ? Strange... i never thought they were blacks or hispanos
Assad is a brutal butcher !!!
Pro Islamo Arabo Jihados should fill the media with Anti Assad posts.. demanding democracy to Syria and not dictatorship.

 

Isis and the poor Syrian citizens tasted the barrel bombs.
Never read a post here from pro Islamo Jihado Arabos against that evil crime.

 

I don't want Assad's dictatorship to survive - and neither do the people of Syria - least not for the long term.

Like the freedom loving people of Syria - who fought to keep Assad in Power in the short term - I agree with their cause .. which was to stop the Islamic State from replacing Heir Basshar.

You have been on the side of the Al Qaeda - and the Islamic State .. you admire Brother El Saud - who was also on the side of the Islamic State - along with Turkey - Qatar - and a large number of other nations - and of Course your the USA under your beloved Obama.

and so no - you are not on the side of democracy and freedom.. as that was the side of Assad/Russia/Iran/China

did you not understand the DIA memo given you a number of times previously -- stating who was on what side ? The one that you agreed was True - The memo you are now pretending to have not seen

http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-con...12-DOD-Release-2015-04-10-final-version11.pdf

Which was the side of democracy and freedom ? and give up on the "Syrian Democratic Forces" false narrative - as they were not fighting Assad - and you are in the wrong time period .. but you know this - but continue returning to this same vomitous deception over and over... in a desperate attempt to apologize for your beloved El Saud.

 

It is an easy choice- clearly you don't know much about situation - other than spoon fed propaganda narrative.

You need to get out more .

 

You seem to lack the ability to realize when you are being spoon fed a propaganda narrative. Barrel Bombs - are designed to kill people .. as are cluster bombs..

Would you rather a Syrian Barrel Bomb land in your vicinity or a US cluster bomb .. or how about the MOAB - which is also designed to kill people.

Do tell why these horrible barrel bombs are so much worse than MOAB .. and what do you think we were reigning down on Raqqa ? Bombs that were not designed to kill people ?

eeahhhhh .. ohhhh .. oooooo uhhhhh ..

 

A butcher, but the US simply outshines in a grim way how they effectively kill more civilians.
And white fascists should fill the media with fake news....

 

It was a south vietnam airplane who droped that napalm...

 

It's like hearing Iran say they did no do it, but only supplied the terrorists. But not to worry, the m American baby killers bombed about all cities in North Korea to kill as many civilians as possible. Point still stands that the US has absolutely no moral high grounds to comment on some little barrel bomb that he drops on civilians. It really does not compare well with what the US did.

 

Why, it’s exactly what the Iranian do with hezbollah. Whatever massacre hezbollah does Iran is a party to it.

and here’s the reality of our sad little world... nobody has any moral high grounds, in fact there’s no morals at all. If push comes to shoves you can’t depend on anybody. Yesterday’s allies will slit your throat while you sleep if his clan can profit by it.

 

Oh bravo, you got my hint about Iran. And as in, no moral high ground. Iran has a point in calling the US the biggest sponsor of terrorism.
Putting it this way: it takes a white western point of view to still support the idea of deliberately nuclear bombing civilians in Japan (besides deliberately burning them alive in about 60 other cities, with incinerating bombs who got tested in the US on reproduced Japanese style civilian buildings to research how to do it the most effective way) on one side,.... while also point fingers at who ever harms civilians. Total frensy going on in the US when some poor but violent mob in Hong Kong is being beaten away by the cops.... as if they are dropping a nuke on them. Please....

 

No but.
A butcher !
Pro Islamo Jihado Arabos should push their propaganda so Syria will be a democracy.
Not ruled by a butcher.
Syrians are not stakes or Chicken wings.

 

That's an answer written by someone who knows he is wrong because in his heart he cares about the Syrians but he thinks One Alawayte Butcher is better than an Islamic Butcher ISIS group.
You need to be brave and demand democracy to Syria and other Arab countries.

 

Imo, they are more likely to lose than use one. Major terrorist organizations probably feel this way too, and I bet you will find many of their leaders and operations there.

 

Quite blubbering made up nonsense about others. Assad is a bad guy - no one has denied this.

Your claim however - that the Assad Regime was as bad as Saudi Arabia - and/or the Islamic State is preposterous falsehood on steroids.

Syria was a shining star of freedom and civil liberties by comparison - which is why the people of Syria fought for Assad .. including the 50% of his regular forces who were Sunni.

Who is demanding democracy ? What are you blubbering about now ..

 

One would hope not -- but your point is taken in that the possibility is greater there than anywhere else. .. and of course many leaders have operations in Pakistan - Pakistan is radical Islam central .. groups that did the mumbai bombing and so on. Lots of places to go .. the Ex Soviet Stans -- Libya now run by these groups thanks to Obamalama.

The biggest terrorist threat is the fact that the US keeps arming and supporting these groups.

 

The dark side of the moon maybe.

 

I don't believe the US is "funding" these groups. There are bad men all over the world. Part of doing business, diplomacy, espionage, engaging in war, or pursuing justice is dealing with these men. I remember when I become certain that my government was paying the Russian mafia for use of an airport. I wouldn't say the US was "funding" the Russian mafia, although someone with political motives would. The Russian mafia would and does exist independently of the deal to use the airport. It would be incorrect, or even misleading to say we "funded" them

 

You're in the wrong time zone, you keep citing this article as if it proves Barack Obama deliberately backed ISIS/AQ, all it says is that they were the most successful groups to take Assad on at the time (having had years of guerrilla warfare experience) and had benefitted from the arms Obama had supplied which they had stolen or bought from the other Western backed fighters. So, do you back the SDF in their attempts to defeat Assad and make Syria free and democratic or do you support the dictatorship? Simple question?

 

What it says is that Sectarian groups = Radical Islamists - such as AQ - and other Salafist groups which the memo says the West Supports.

It named AQI in the groups supported by the west - Ding - Dong - along with other "SECTARIAN" groups .. stating that these groups were in charge.

The SDF were not at this time - nor were they ever part of the Anti Assad forces.. and you have been pretending you havn't been informed of this fact 10 times already.

So quite making up nonsense .. and pretending the SDF were the rebels fighting Assad - in a desperate attempt to try to avoid the reality - told to you by the DIA, and 15 in congress .. and so on ... that which you previously agreed.

What disingenuous post - deception and self delusion - falsehood after falsehood.

 

Another bad exemple on your part, sorry to say. The Japanese in WW2 massacred and raped their way in China, Korea and the Philipine. No civilians were spared in Nanking for exemple and then there's unit 731... The Japanese deserved to be nuked. Hell I'd nuked Berlin too but they surrendered too fast.