Their correct answer DISCREDITS the OP utterly! The DECISION as to whether or not to have an abortion is NOT up to anyone else besides the pregnant woman/women and their doctor. THEY get to make their decision in PRIVATE and the OP's disingenuous attempt to come up with a PREPOSTEROUS scenario because he has FAILED with everything else is nothing more than DESPERATION on his part. Their womb, their decision. NOT your womb, NOT your decision. /thread fail
LOL, don't you ever worry about what you worry about .. .how many hours did you spend dreaming about "the PERCENT of feeling "down there" ….LOL... "down there".... is that like down under in Australia....what TF is "down there" ? How did you measure the percentage ??? BY HAND ????
Ignoring questions and remarks that show the level of hypocrisy one be one of the first illustrations
Such a great point. It's odd to me that the 'side' who wants government to step out of their lives is the same 'side' that wants the government to dictate what a woman can do with her own body.
It is the typical hypocrisy both sides are known for. Conservatives care about babies until they take a breath, and Liberals value a womans right to bodily autonomy until they wants to protect her body from rapists and murderers with a gun.
WTF? You who has claimed it's "nature", "natural" can say something so silly ???? Bet you'll never answer: How is pregnancy a "strange circumstance"?
Huh? What liberal has ever argued that a woman has an unrestricted right to anything that might help her keep control over her body?
You are pretending that if someone is on the far left, they "dream of" the common ownership of everything. That's not just ridiculous. It's deeply dishonest. Step one in trying to interact productively with someone on the other side of the debate is not to bulldust them.
Why would this satisfy anyone? The question is over the fetui's personhood, not about twins. This doesn't answer that fundamental question, instead it assumes an answer (baby). Simple as that.
In Los Angeles, CCWs are not issued to ordinary citizens so only cops, judges, and criminals carry guns here. If she should wish to protect her body from a rapist or murderer, liberals have given the 200 pound rapist an advantage. Such a well thought out, compelling rebuttal. Even better than "nuh uh!"
You didn't answer my question. What liberal has ever argued that a woman has an unrestricted right to anything that might help her keep control over her body?
We've already talked about this before in other threads. This talk about doctors is completely dishonest. Show me one circumstance where the opinion of a doctor was ever enough to stop the woman from getting an abortion. Reality is you don't think the doctor should have anything to do with the decision, which you think is all hers.
Yes, it is "their" womb, and by "their" meaning not just the woman's. If woman and fetus are one body, then they are sharing it.
MOVING the goalposts AGAIN? What happened to the COJOINED women? Suddenly it is an INCONVENIENCE for you to deal with BOTH of them? Sad! This talk about the FETUS is completely dishonest. Show me one circumstance where the SHARING was ever enough for the FETUS to OVERRIDE the RIGHTS of the woman concerned. Reality is you don't think the WOMAN should have anything to do with the decision, which you think is the decision that ONLY the FETUS is allowed to make.
. How can the fetus be in it's own womb? But only the women gets to decide IF she wants to share it.....it's that Women With Power thing that Anti-Choicers hate
LOL, when one is shown they have no point OR FACTS AND CAN'T SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES and it's shown they aren't very nice for trying to destroy women's rights they sure have a hissy fit of silly meaningless photos and trite slogans and chants......
DUHHHHHH, don't most people think their children are more important than someone else's ??? No points for you !
It is not hard to understand. What is difficult is finding agreement. What you see as an open and shut case - a case of definitive right and wrong - is something that I also see as definitive. I am resolute in my support of a woman's right to choose what happens to her own body.
