Guilty! And silence in the forum???

No it’s justice because this was obviously criminal.

 

Can you say that not a single jurist was influenced by the possibility of damage to his self, personal property or business? If so, how do you know this?

 

You're funny.

 

So, you can’t post a link. Expected.

 

The routine administration of justice is unremarkable.

 

It is not criminal until a jury says it is otherwise you are but a vigilante.

 

You’re allowed to have an opinion. No definition of vigilante says having an opinion makes you one lol

 

I fall into the same category, how does this equate to a credibility problem?

I can think of but one reason, because you are an extremist Trumpet who shoves all non cultists into the same stereotype.

 

agree but you did not state that was your opinion

it is obligatory to so do if that is the case

 

Lol what else would it be?

 

a statement of fact, obviously

which is what got you challenged

your LOL is a proactive way to try and save face.



still, I offer you peace

 

If they felt intimidated they could have said so and not been selected.
And of course they take an oath to act fairly.

Now what makes you think one was intimidated.

 

In other words, you refuse to answer the question.

 

No. I answered the question.
It's you that can't come up with a juror that says they were intimidated.

 

I have not said one was. Because of political interference, the possibility exists.

Again: Can you say that not a single jurist was influenced by the possibility of damage to his self, personal property or business? If so, how do you know this?

 

That would be terrible for the doughnut business.

 

You can't come up with anything relating to this jury. Thanks for playing.

 

Your feeling or faux tv told you that.
Pretty incredible thoughts, to think BLM wanted Chauvin to go free just so they could riot.

Says more about you than BLM.

 

I know he had a load of cop weight on his body,

What crimes? Where's this so called counterfeit $20?

 

No, the video showed about 9 ,minutes of this.

Impossible to miss that one.

 

You think prayers swayed the Jury. How cute.

 

The fake $20 is in evidence. If you doubt this, you're not arguing honestly.
Drug possession would be the next crime, except he swallowed it all, triggering a cardiopulmonary crisis which Chauvin had no idea was happening.

That's on Floyd, not Chauvin.

If the skin colors were reversed, liberals would take the opposite position. Which is how intelligent people know this is all BS.

 

A drug called knee on neck

 

Unfortunate as it is, the video misses the minutes where Floyd ingested a fatal dose of the drugs he was addicted to. The video doesn't show - at all - despite your ignorant insistence - that Floyd did not die because his blocked arteries couldn't handle 3 times the lethal limit of junk drugs.

 

So, when's the trial to convict of this so called "fake $20"?