Microbiologist: "They are Killing People with these COVID Vaccines" to Reduce the World's Population

This thread is turning out to be a good study of sophistry.

 

This article is two weeks old.

24,526 Deaths 2,317,495 Injuries Following COVID Shots Reported In European Union’s Database Of Adverse Drug Reactions
https://humansarefree.com/2021/09/deaths-injuries-covid-shots-eu.html


This may turn out to be true.

It’s All Rigged! CDC Allows Hospitals To Classify ‘Fully Vaccinated’ Deaths As ‘Unvaccinated’
https://humansarefree.com/2021/10/c...-fully-vaccinated-deaths-as-unvaccinated.html

I think it's pretty clear that their purpose is to kill people.

 

if they wanted to kill people with the vaccine, they would just sell saline water

 

isn't that what it's intention was

 

Instead of making snide remarks, why don't you address the info?

 

what was your post if not snide remarks?

 

The truth.

 

Bullshit and spam. One of your stock go to responses. This thread has everyone kicking your inept butt! Your credibility was zero before and remains so.

Something that you never write. You are the opposite of truth, the pinnacle of batshit is your goal.

Is that significant? Is this your new yardstick for batshit?

And the spam continues, we are back to causation and correlation once again, not to mention outright stupidity and deliberate deception.

Debunked: No, EU and US databases do not show that thousands of people have died from Covid-19 vaccines (thejournal.ie)

Then damn well verify it! The batshit link just makes a claim with no verification and ignores causation/correlation and reason for death!

Your posts are the same every time:

See batshit post batshit!

 

You are not clever enough to understand the real simple thing! Small children understand this:
Idiotic. If you take the same year difference from 2021 to 2020, between the period BEFORE rollout you get an even bigger difference, PROVING that the vaccine is not the cause of the yearly variation. Notwithstanding that there is NO INCREASE from 8 weeks before to the 8 weeks of the damn rollout!



I have explained it to you in painfully simple language that young children would understand!

1. The green area shows vaccine rollout.
2. The 8 weeks before there are no vaccines.
3. The two totals are the same!
4. There is no UPWARD trend.

If you are simply playing dumb on this, you are doing a very good job. It is so stunningly obvious that there is no spike. The makers of that website and the one referenced are lying frauds, taking data and cherry picking, then making bullshit claims by omission! Not one conspiracy "researcher" will check their data, certainly not you!

Admit it, try to gain a semblance of credibility. You won't do that. It will be some clown comment about debunker food! Or your usual go to spam about it not making all the other batshit go away!

 

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...rlds-population.587240/page-6#post-1072981515
http://www.politicalforum.com/index...rlds-population.587240/page-6#post-1072982547

 

Your links actually suggest the very thing I just did. I compared the period before rollout with the corresponding period one year before. You are afraid to admit you are wrong!

If you take the same year difference from 2021 to 2020, between the period BEFORE rollout you get an even bigger difference, PROVING that the vaccine is not the cause of the yearly variation. Notwithstanding that there is NO INCREASE from 8 weeks before to the 8 weeks of the damn rollout!

I have explained it to you in painfully simple language that young children would understand!

1. The green area shows vaccine rollout.
2. The 8 weeks before there are no vaccines.
3. The two totals are the same!
4. There is no UPWARD trend.

 

Some important videos I posted got deleted because I didn't make any comments about them in the post. I couldn't think of anything to say that the article didn't already say so I said that. I didn't especially want to say it.

 

Really? You think I give a rat's backside about your comments? How about you answer the damn post. BE SPECIFIC!

There is an increase in the rollout period between 2021 and 2020. There is a bigger increase in the period BEFORE the rollout using the same length period. Your claim is cherry picked bullshit. Admit it, be a man!

 

I'm looking for a list of the weekly deaths in England for the whole 2020 year and a partial list for this year. When I find that, I'll do some more comparing.

 

That IS the list for the whole 2020 year!

 

Deaths registered weekly in England and Wales, provisional - Office for National Statistics (ons.gov.uk)

Page 1 of the source of the stupid link you posted!

 

Every link I click on just gives me an opportunity to pay to continue so I'm going to look for another source.

In the meantime...

I addressed this in post #143.
http://politicalforum.com/index.php...rlds-population.587240/page-6#post-1072981515
(excerpt)
-----------------------------------------------------
The rollout is the beginning. I takes while before a significant number of people get jabbed. To get a realistic idea of the effect of the jab, a time before the rollout has to be compared with the same time after the rollout a year later. The time after the rollout should be a few months.
-----------------------------------------------------

You're not considering this factor. To get a good idea of the difference in the death rates between the time before the rollout and the time after the rollout, the after-the-rollout sample should be taken well after the beginning so that there are enough vaccinated people and the vaccine has had time to do its damage. The before-the-rollout sample should be compared with an after-the-rollout sample that is well after the beginning of the rollout. If the before-the-rollout sample is compared with an after-the-rollout sample that doesn't have many vaxxed people yet, we don't get a realistic picture of what's happening.


This is not that clear.




I want to use some lines taken from a reliable source that clearly show the deaths per week with the dates shown for both 2020 and 2021. All the comparisons will be very clear that way and we won't have to worry about whether the figures are bogus.

You're good at finding stuff. I'm going to be busy with work for a few days. Could you find a site that shows the data this way?

 

What the hell! Every stupid link you put up begs for money!

No you did not! If your uninformed arbitrary caveat is some random period, then this also applies to your bullshit link - therefore invalidating it!

Neither are you!

So why the hell are you posting crap that ignores that!?

Are you really this dense? These are the official death figures from the official source as quoted by your stupid batshit links.

Pathetic, the figures are perfectly clear, as are the comparisons. There is no increase. You are just trying to "muddy the waters", all the viewers can see what you are doing. You got caught out yet again (so many times now) posting lies and deception from a batshit site. When someone (ME!) uses the scientific method to validate the batshit, I prove it is lies and deception. An honest free-thinking seeker of the truth would acknowledge it. As stated before you never do this, you defend it come what may.

No more so than the vast majority - you're just useless at it.

Already done and posted.

 

They are not perfectly clear. Everything is a little vague because you modified the chart with the figures. The chart you posted isn't on any of these pages the way you posted it and you've falsified stuff before.
https://humansarefree.com/2021/10/deaths-among-teenagers-up-56-since-vaccine-roll-out-began.html
https://theexpose.uk/2021/09/30/dea...-by-47-percent-since-covid-vaccination-began/
https://humansarefree.com/2021/10/o...ave-increased-since-the-covid-19-vaccine.html

I'd like to do some comparisons but I want to know that I'm working with the right numbers.

 

YES THEY ARE!

Nothing is vague. The chart uses the data from both years side by side from the source your batshit website used.

The data is there and even a small child can click a link and cut and paste a line from a spreadsheet. The fact that this simple, basic task confuses you, speaks volumes about your incompetence.

A serious and bullshit allegation. This is your go to "explanation" for when you get owned - and that is so very often!

Then go and get them you complete failure of a truth seeker. It is so painfully easy to do - literally 2 minutes work.

1. From your lying batshit link - ONS data
2. From that link 2021 data
3. From that link 2020 data
4. From 2020 data, tab (at bottom) "Weekly figures 2021" line 26.
15-19 6 16 10 15 23 10 16 20 24 21 18 15 12 9 8 20 11 14 9 13 13 7 10 10 9 2 14 11 10 9 12 13 12 14 14 7 15 15 13 12 12 15 14 15 12 7 17 18 15 8 11 10 8
5. From 2021 data, tab (at bottom) "Weekly figures 2021" line 22.
15-19 15 14 22 18 15 12 15 20 15 12 15 18 14 13 16 12 13 17 16 14 12 9 21 14 16 23 12 20 16 16 8 17 20 20 15 22 12 10



*2021 data now has week 38 - 5 down on 2020 week 38.

 

I'll link to one example even though it's off-topic.
http://politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/the-moon-landing-is-fake.553296/page-16#post-1072818902
http://politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/the-moon-landing-is-fake.553296/page-17#post-1072821795

You said that a link to a video existed when it didn't. I've come to expect this sort of thing from you.

 

(from post #129)

I checked them and they were exactly the same.

I think you mean 8 instead of 18.

Those eight weeks in 2020 had 96 deaths and 130 in 2021. If it's higher in 2021, isn't that evidence that there's something extra there? To me this looks consistent with the vaccine causing deaths. What am I missing here?

 

I think post #167 explains it.
http://politicalforum.com/index.php...rlds-population.587240/page-7#post-1072984722

The upward trend won't be noticed until a significant number of people get the jab. That's why it's higher later.

 

So, let me get this straight. You couldn't find the ALSJ footage that takes 2 minutes to find and THAT is your moronic example?

And you say I didn't post it because it doesn't exist as opposed to me having fun winding you up because you are an incompetent "researcher"?

That is moronic again and you know it. You totally lack the honesty to admit that a) my figures and data is perfectly correct as it always is, b) that this claim invalidates your batshit website and c) any honest person can see that there is no increase comparable with before rollout or a whole year and a half before.

And you have the audacity to claim you are a truth seeker! Meh!

HERE at 148:55 - https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a15/a15.clsout2.html

Now apologize!!

 

If you were telling the truth and it still exists, post it.

I'm sorry. The video that proves the moon missions were faked in a studio is still there.