RITTENHOUSE Verdict unleashes CELEBRATIONS, on the RIGHT

Then, clean-up in aisle 5, he plays the gullible rube card.

 

At the age of 17, that's the most likely explanation. Certainly complies with Occam's Razor.
Your prejudice (animus?) is showing.
The larger point is that the "white supremacist" label never had any foundation.

 

Success is most likely for people who aren't public figures.

 

People are under the impression that they can play judge jury and executioner just because they can watch the trial on TV. You aren't the judge, prosecutor, defense attorney or member of the jury so stop. Trials should NOT be televised. Jury verdicts need to be resepected. Politics and emotion cannot play a part in forming a judgment on the guilt or innocence of the defendant. I'm not saying you can't have an opinion. I'm saying that you must be willing to admit that your opinion is not relevent and plays no role in deciding what happens.

 

Your sympathies are showing. The larger point is Greenwald's article is bs, having the advantage of 20/20 hindsight.





Kyle doesn't look remorseful to me.

 

LOL, you think someone is supposed to be remorseful for saving their own life? Liberal logic 101.

 

First, context never seems to matter to you. And second, who cares if someone can simultaneously be tortured by the acts he was made to do to defend himself, and still present a public face of optimism. I know those things aren't usually a part of the leftist tool set, but perhaps you might learn something from this.

 

He has no reason to "look" remorseful.
As for Greenwald, he's guilty only of exposing the media's baseless rush to judgment.

 

Why are you so willing to allow this small marginal group control you in such a manner that you can no longer you use the long traditional totally innocuous


?????

And BTW Rittenhouse had no idea who the persons were or that the
long traditional totally innocuous


Meant anything else than OK so why not stop with the fallacious claims?

 

I don't think he could live a quiet life on campus:

 

"Lee Brown" needs to do his homework. Arizona State University is in Tempe. The University of Arizona is in Tucson.

 

Will they ever get over it:

 

Perhaps CNN should have spent less time making baseless accusations against Rittenhouse and more time checking the unethical behavior of their own Chris Cuomo.

 

He is a virtual student, does attend on campus and they still want this innocent student banned from the school.

 

Doesn't seem to be any adults in charge to simply tell them they have no right to make such a demand on an innocent person now go away.

 

Should there be any penalties:

 

Yes, punish them for rioting, but let's not go overboard. The people who burned and looted all throughout 2020 and into 2021, did so to damage our culture and society, and defund our police, and break down our system of justice. They should also be tossed in prison. But they represented the Democrat Party's positions on so many issues, that they were treated with kid gloves.

The difference is, the Republicans and Democrats denounced the Jan 6th rioters. The democrats supported the BLM and antifa thugs, going even so far as to donate to organization to bail them out of jail, and refer to their insurrectionist acts as "The Summer of Love."

 

If both Republicans and Democrats in the US Congress were not becoming fascistic corporate crony looters of the US Treasury, there would not have been a president Trump.

 

Calling out Hollywood virtue-signaling:

 

We disagree.

 

Good advice there, at the end, but I disagree with your blanket statement, that trials should not be televised. In cases, for example, when the community has developed distrust of law enforcement, with valid reason, I think the transparency is more beneficial than it is inflammatory, and definitely better than conducting certain high-profile trials, in the dark. Remember, court trials are, as a general rule, public information.