In addition to being a diversion, your question assumes a false premise. You can't think of a way to enforce the laws you support and have filled an entire thread with dodges and diversions.
I did not ask for the DEFINITION of the word. Again, how much would abortion need to be reduced by in order for you to say that the laws CAN be "enforced?"
Elective abortion would be outlawed, abortion drugs would be illegal and not all abortions can be achieved with drugs anyway, and not everyone can do medical tourism. So what are the options?
The options that shut down your position were listed many pages back. You are unable to describe how abortion laws could be enforced and are running out of diversions.
Yes, your list was abortion drugs and medical tourism. I have shown how they would be insufficient. Abortion drugs would be illegal and not all abortions can be achieved with drugs anyway, and not everyone can do medical tourism. Simple!
How much would abortion need to be reduced by in order for you to say that the laws CAN be "enforced?"
Nope. Use the quote feature and address the list I posted in a way that describes how you would enforce abortion laws. You could not demonstrate any reduction. I can show you how abortion rates are the lowest since Roe V Wade without government interference.
Medical tourism and abortions drugs were not in your list? When something is made illegal, less of it happens. That's obvious. Is this an argument against making elective abortion illegal?
The dance of the dodger may not be graceful, but is entertaining nonetheless. Your post contains neither truth nor substance.
How can you dodge what I never said? You were going to describe how these laws could be enforced and tell us how many of these precious little lives you adopted. Well?...
I did and if you missed it, read your own posts where you repeat it over and over. You were going to describe how these laws could be enforced and tell us how many of these precious little lives you adopted. Well?...
If by "Orwellian Totalitarian Vunderland" you mean a world where babies are not killed in the womb, then yes!
Yes .. you want to force women - through physical violance - to do your bidding - resulting in the death of many "innocent babies" Shameful ..
You are in the right world since "babies" aren't killed in the womb...that's an impossibility... Glad to help...
In your world .. the one that you created .. the world where a zygote is an "Innocent Baby" Many of these Innocent Children "Murdered" during Child birth.
