Georgia Black Man Charged with Murder Claims He Shot at White Teens in Self-Defense

Yes it is my fault for assuming I was engaging a working intellect and not one so rigid in their unchanging and unchangbel

The fault is mine. I should know better than to engage a closed, unchanging and unchangeable mind set. Sorry!

 

You are projecting. You are completely incorrect yet you refuse to acknowledge it. You refuse to change your mind in the face of your arguments falling apart. You are literally what you think I am.

Again, the facts arent on your side. You are projecting here once again.

 

Yes. It is. Why? Because its the truth. You are the one that can't accept it.

 

It's factually correct.

 

I'm only asking what ethnicity did what. I do think the people who all did that, are predominantly white. It is very historically accurate. So sorry you like to white wash history.

 

I asked for DNA evidence, not a link to how fast people drive in specifically New Jersey.

 

Study history more. History does not start when white people started doing what they did. For instance the Mongol Empire was not led by whites yet they killed millions (estimates are around 35 million, around 11% of the worlds population at the time) and conquered vast amounts of land destroying far more people and cultures than the US ever has. Also slavery existed in Africa LONG before white countries even began to become an empire.

Study history more.

 

You're not telling me anything new, while you're clearly are fully deflecting what the whites have done to the world. The previous rather racist post claimed it's in the DNA of black people to be violently criminal. While I have not seen any study that supports that. And I added that white people have been utterly violently criminal world wide for centuries on a massively bigger scale. Unfortunately for far right wing white nationalism, it's simply true. And what you've put up is not disputing that at all. FYI that figure of 35 million is being dwarfed by carnage the white population did in WWI alone. White people killed about twice as many when colonizing North/South America. Study history more indeed.

 

carrying a "piece" is a constitutional right. a motor vehicle is a deadly weapon. i'm for hearing the evidence before convicting this guy.

 

Not trying to deflect at all. What I am doing is showing you is that whites are not the only ones to "oppress the world under colonial thug rule" as you claim.

And WWI killed around 40 million according to: LINK: reperes112018.pdf (census.gov)

As for Indigenous people of the America's killed in wars, no one has an actual number. But often when talking about the "genocide of Indigenous peoples" people often include those killed by diseases. A stupid thing really since most people of the time didn't know didely squat about how diseases worked or came about. Much less know that they would be carrying diseases that Indigenous people had never come into contact with. But for war the numbers killed varies widely between various historians. Since there is no consensus of just how many Indigenous people there even was in the Americas (estimates range from 8 million to 112 million), much less how many were killed, your claim is unprovable.

And btw, the Mongol Empire isn't even in the top 10 of empires that killed the most people before white people even thought of expanding outside their native countries.

White people have most definitely done many bad things in the world. Slaughtered millions. That is a fact. No downplaying it. But to paint white people as being worse than any other race as your post implies is just plain D racist. JUST as racist as the person that you were responding to regarding the DNA crap. EVERY race has done horrible things through out history. No ones hands are clean. But no ones hands are completely blood soaked either. Every race has contributed various good things to this world too. If all you ever do is focus on the bad, you will fail to notice the good.

 

HUH? I stopped reading right here, since it's yes the whites are the only ones who did that. You dragged in the Mongol empire, but they never ruled much beyond their own continent. The entire point remains that some far right wing white nationalists claims that the violence is in the DNA of black people, while the white population historically has been utterly far more violent. I gave examples. While the entire DNA-claim is total nonsense. So that's the end for me.

If you wish to pick up the flag, then you go find me an other ethnicity that pushed the entire globe under their brutal slave thug rule / find me that DNA part that makes an ethnicity more violent then an other.

 

These same people from the left that you are arguing with now have historic posts that show them saying Rittenhouse was not acting in self defense. Racism? Maybe I don’t know. But they definitely are okay with this and not Rittenhouse so that says something doesn’t it

 

You would be incorrect. The black population in Africa and the Muslim conquests resulted in far more genocide than anything whites ever did.

 

Genetics is the ONLY logical explanation which fits all the facts. Therefore, as Sherlock Holmes says, “Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.”

 

And the worst and evilest of them all is communism
communism has mass murdered over 140 million in the last two centuries more so than any other ideology in the history of man including Colonialism
yet here you and your fellow comrades trying to march us down that same Marxist road
so get off your high horse with your scolding and look inward with what you promote and wish for
your alignment is more deadly and evil than what you are condemning others for

 

There is a famous book called the black book of communism, and they put the amount killed on 95 million. FYI, communism is against colonialism and the slavery that goes with it since it's part of capitalism. And the amount of people killed in North and South America is -top of my head- somewhere around 60 million. That leaves no doubt that the carnage it caused on the other continents can only be bigger then 35 million. Which makes your claim about how many people got killed by colonialism far fetched.

 

Muslim conquest was almost never a genocidal one. The Ottoman empire was actually a safe haven for Jews who were being persecuted out of Europe. The whites simply outmatched everybody else under their brutal colonial rule with their utterly racist mentality that their white race is superior and so that justified whatever cruelty. That culture is still around today.

 

Tell that to the Armenians, Assyrians and Greeks

And for the record the Ottoman Empire was the single largest slave trading empire in the history of mankind. BY FAR.

 

I don't even wish to respond to her so as to entertain her foolishness so I will laugh at her with you instead!!!

Does she really think people are ignorant enough of History to swallow that BS?

 

Depends. You can't have a firearm if you are a felon or don't have a CCW permit. The only time the CCW permit doesn't matter is if you are are in an open carry state. And good luck defending you are being attacked by a vehicle when you are in vehicle yourself.

 

Sounds like you were just mad that they were the best at the game.

 

Them genocides didn't happen with Muslim conquest, but 1000's of years after the conquest when the colonial powers made the Ottoman empire to be cut up in dozens and dozens of countries. And the British empire was the biggest slave nation of history, by far. Your idea that people were free in the colonies of the UK, is just some weird childish romanticizing white nationalistic theme. You're really out of line.

 

Sounds like white nationalists are mad, that when confronted to the facts that they can not dispute that the whites have been the most violent of people.

 

Rudolph Joseph Rummel (October 21, 1932 – March 2, 2014)[1] was a political scientist and professor at the Indiana University, Yale University, and University of Hawaiʻi. He spent his career studying data on collective violence and war with a view toward helping their resolution or elimination. Contrasting genocide, Rummel coined the term democide for murder by government, such as the genocide of indigenous peoples and colonialism, Nazi Germany, the Stalinist purges, Mao Zedong's Cultural Revolution, and other authoritarian, totalitarian, or undemocratic regimes, coming to the conclusion that democratic regimes result in the least democides.[2]

Rummel estimated that a total of 212 million people were killed by all governments during the 20th century,[3] of which 148 million were killed by Communist governments from 1917 to 1987
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolph_Rummel#cite_note-4

and no communisms isn't against slavery they were proficient at it what do you think the Russian gulags were? slave camps
hell China is still participating in slavery of thousands of Uighur Muslims
you woke leftist problem is you cant distinguish between the theory of communism which is nothing but a unattainable crazy fantasy and the reality of it with its attempt to implement it

 

Are you aware that of them 148 million who were killed by communists government, that the nazi's are among them... because the nazi's attacked them? And this is also the soldiers killed in NK and Vietnam. All of them are totally legit targets. And not everybody is impressed with how this guy was adding his numbers. And so I wouldn't know why my source somehow is invalid.

I also have yet to see colonialism got less people killed. Do note, for the comparison of colonialism that your guy did not count anybody who died from colonialism prior to 1917... so that excludes the entire Atlantic slave trade, among things.