Florida could shield whites from ‘discomfort’ of racist past

Since you haven't given me a great argument as to how CRT and this stupid Bingo game are not similar, I'll just trash your argument as being more of a temper tantrum then a debate.

I just posted a Bingo privilege card which misses all the main social inherited privileges and instead focuses in on race and sex to victimize people of color. You know? To look at privilege through the lens of race? And you haven't given me a great reason as to how that's not downstream of CRT.

Until you do, we are done.

 

The discomfort is covert with "compels such individual to believe specified concept".
And I see you got no other interpretation.

 

Indeed.

Let's not play hide and seek on it.
The thing also is that the south had the slaves picking cotton. The north had the textile industry, international trade, investments going on. The idea that buying goods from slave owners to make your own profits, is making you complicit to slavery, is a concept that wasn't there at all. Arians, Jews, Democrats and Republics were all part of that system.

 

So it's obvious that this law makes it illegal to name what ethnicity did what.

And no. Those Americans do not have slavery in any of their so called "home nations". It's been banned. All there is are illegal activities of human trafficing. The US isn't shy of that either with all the illegals running in.

 

Republican answer to everything.. Ignore it and it will go away.

"Small government" is the sweetest con there is. Government takes a HUGE portion of your income and gives you next to nothing in services, then says that's how they guarantee your FFRREEEDDOOMM and conservatives eat it with a spoon.

 

Is it? I don't see how it's not possible to use that law when a white person feels discomfort.

The fact is that only black people were enslaved by the Arians and Jews. Which proves it was purely racist. We all know those Arians and Jews, after they lost the war, changed it that only the black people were 2nd class citizens.... which is all about making sure they remain at the bottom of the social economic ladder by a good margin. The generation Arians and Jews of Biden and Trump personally benefitted from that until it all legally ended when they were in their 20's. And the next generation is inheriting that social economic ladder. We all know how Hunter Biden got it's odd jobs, just like Ivanka and Donald jr got their jobs.

We all know that this is aimed against CRT.

 

History is an important art.

 

Very likely, and as it should be. The primary 'scholarly' contributors to CRT write that institutional racism is largely caused by white people's lack of a valuation of their racial identity which results in a lack of white people's valuation of racial minorities' own perception of a valuable racial identity and results in that racial identity being oppressed. Which is really just a complicated way of saying that white people cause racism by not being racist... I'm fine with such subjective and illogical concepts being taught to adults who volunteer to 'learn' about such things, but it has no constructive or practical purpose being pushed on kids.

 

I see no race was mentioned. So how do you people come up with "white people" ?

I don't need to " interpret " I'll stick to simply reading... I'll leave the tea leaves for you to read into.

 

Nonsense. It's white people caused racism in the past, the recent past, by law. They succeeded with keeping black people being at the bottom of the social economic ladder back in the day. And that generation who did that is still alive. The gains and losses are passed on to the next generation. That's all to it. And the GOP do not want to own up on it while they go pro slaver flag waving around them traitor general statues.

 

I sourced it's about race. And I still see no other interpretation from you.

 

diversity training should not be making whites out to be the bad guys, it should be teaching everyone to get along regardless of race

and they should teach higher ups that they need to hire more Americans, it's racist to move all your employees overseas

 

This is a response to the war on people of the white race
I guess you do not realize that people can push back against "hate whites" campaign.

 

Like I said, you are cherry picking the history to create an environment of hate.
Every country in the world involve in the crimes against humanity.
Why don't you just to try to create better society where all races are equal?

 

What I didn't realize was that fact there was a war against me, - but then again, I am not that easily played. I KNOW there is no war against me. You have been told you are under attack, and you'll trade away anything to have your political leaders come and save your hide.

You have fallen for an old tactic.

"....voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country.” - Hermann Goering

 

war is a war it is ugly. No one cares that you have not been attacked personally.
Whoever started the war should be prosecuted for war crimes.
And we all know very well who has started the hate campaign.

 

So source for us where it says it only applies to white people.

Like I said I don't need to read tea leaves and interpret them I'll simply read the text of the bill.

I'll leave the subsequent interpretation to your opinion

 

War crimes? Prosecuted?

Well, talking about certain things is now officially criminalized, so you can use the the strong arm of the government to take down the people who disagree with you. Its exactly what you wanted.

"Support your local thought police". - 1984

 

How about you go source that white people are excluded from that bill.

Like I said. You have no other explanation.

 

The bill does not specifically mentioned anyone by race if you had actually read the bill instead of doing your interpretations and twisting you would be able to see that but that doesn't go well with your narrative so you ignore that.

Explain your lack of ability to understand that

 

It doesn't have to specify white people. The law which criminalizes speech was created as a response to white people complaining about people talking about race in schools and work places.

Why do you think some whites are constantly talking about "war on white people", and about how they are persecuted all the time? This law is the populist response to that kind of victim mentality, and the other law which criminalized speech about sexuality is obviously NOT a response to LGBT community asking for it, but a response to straight people complain about people talking about sexuality.

You might support these kinds of laws, but this kind of censorship and government intervention is a pretty dark path.

 

The bill specifically mentions it is about race. And you again have not come up with some alternative "reality" what this law is about.

 

Yeah it's pretty bad when you can't use the government in the education system to indoctrinate kids or preach your white devil message.... Dark days ahead for sure!

 

It specifically mentions no race.... Do I need to type it in bigger letters or something?

 

Apparently the point sailed a mile over your head.