Unsigned Trump order told Pentagon to seize voting machines

We all read the call transcript. Sorry, nobody bought into it.

You guys are like Goober running behind Barney Fifes car screaming Citizens Arrest, Citizens Arrest
He can ask for all the personal favors he wants. NOT ILLEGAL
But he can't say, if you don't do this, I won't do this.
But you thought you could twist a few words and SHAZAM, we gottem now.
But all you got was egg on your faces when every witness refused to testify to that fact and Schiff all of a sudden couldn't find his whistle blower.

And yet another leftist dream dashed on the rocks of reality

 

Biden will take care of that.

Trump has given us some good ideas.

But Biden will do even better because he has three more years to go.

If he loses, he'll claim the election was stolen from him by the GOP and their rigged machines.

He'll send the military to seize them and demand that the states decertify the vote.

He will not give anything up.

He'll say it's for the good of the country, to restore Americans' faith in the electoral system that you've corrupted.

The transition of power must also be as difficult as possible.

If MAGA causes problems, then Biden can declare martial law on the grounds that you are a domestic terrorist and he must protect the nation from you.

What do you think?

 

Other than in your own imagination, who did that again?

 

hopefully, because so far he's been an absolute failure.

Just like in 2000 and 2016. Seems crying out fraud in the instance of loss is far more common among Democrats they have a 22 year history of it

Sounds like Democrats.

 

The difference is that since 2020, crying imaginary fraud is legitimate to keep the power.

 

He referred them to his PERSONAL lawyer regarding an investigation that said lawyer has publicly admitted was for this client's PERSONAL interest, and not the nation's. There is no interpretation there. Not for anyone capable of rubbing a braincell or two together.

 

The only difference is the party doing it.

 

There is when you read the whole thing and don’t take snippets out. Yeah he was talking about sending Rudy. That’s not illegal. What was actually said in context sure seems to point to America. That’s why it’s up to interpretation.

I’m not sure if I can believe the guy who set up a press conference outside a lawn service company. What I can believe is what was ACTUALLY said and is recorded. By all means, do point out the testimony or official government transcript of such a thing by Rudy. I’d love to see some testimony to that. Otherwise, one can say it’s Rudy being Rudy.

 

Are you going to answer the question or not?

 

Why be so concerned of voting machines being looked at.....unless there is something to hide?

 

Donald went to the supreme court to stop the archives to be turned over the the jan 6th commission. The supreme court where some judges owe their jobs to Donald. That is not an effort to hide it?

 

The GOP has no problem at all to lock people up without mentioning what law was broken.
That is the simple fact. And now the shoe is on the other foot, making you cry wolf.
Does it look like I care?

 

I'm not the GOP and haven't called for anyone to be locked up. Your attempt to deflect does not change the fact that no laws were broken here and that you have no real complaint.

 

Of course not. And I am not deflecting one bit to note that in a Dems vs GOP, that the GOP have long ago started to promote the call to lock people up. We all know this. Cmon. The shoe is now on the other food. I am not interested in people crying wolf over this.

 

If you got a problem with something someone said then you take it up with them, not me. Like I said, I never made those claims myself. So yes, you're deflecting in an attempt to hide your lack of an actual argument.

 

The actual argument is that Donald is responsible for the existence of that document, since Donald was the man in charge. And Donald went to the supreme court in an attempt to cover up these documents to uproot our democracy. The guy is a traitor. I see no problem to go lock him up for it. And all you got going is the GOP crying wolf over it. And does it look like I care?

 

You can't even cite a law showing what crime he committed in this. You can keep going in circles if you like but the fact is at the end of the day, he never signed such a document. And I realize that probably makes you even angrier because if he did then you would have an argument to make, but since he didn't that leaves all of your rage in impotence.

 

Dude... this is about uprooting democracy of the US. It starts to be rather silly to challenge the idea that planning to do something like that is totally fine. A quick google leads to "§2384. Seditious conspiracy" saying you can get 20 years for it. And this attempt was made by people Donald was managing around. The same Donald who went to the supreme court to prevent us from finding this out.

Lock him up.

 

Or, deport him and his offspring to Russia. Problem solved. Putin will shut him up very quickly.

 

There is a lot of irony in you accusing “the left” of falsifying stories, when you started a thread excoriating Arizona Democrats for trying to hide the results of an audit, when it was actually Arizona Republicans who were trying to do so.

But when the falseness of your accusation was pointed out to you, you went silent.

 

Silent because any distraction, gaslighting, flame-baiting or straw was currently unavailable.

 

And you might have a point if he actually signed this. As it is you can't even prove that he in anyway approved of this. Nothing about any of this has anything to do with you wanting to protect democracy or otherwise you wouldn't be chanting "lock him up" without due process. This is all about your own political hatred for a man who dared stand on the wrong side of the aisle. That's your problem, not mine.

 

I'm not seeing in that law that a signature on a plan to uproot democracy is required.


And this is -among things- about the your love for the man who does everything he can to prevent us from finding this out. A man who stands at the wrong side of the aisle because of that.

 

Well, it's the search for any foothold to stand on, you know.

 

I was unaware that I loved the man. That makes things pretty awkward since I didn't vote for him either time.

You're not seeing proof that he approved it either. A lack of signature lends credence to such as well. Your grasping at straws because of your hatred for him.