Secret Service agents willing to testify that Trump didn't lunge at steering wheel

Are you claiming National security is involved in anything that was related to events of 1/6? That's absurd on its face.

 

FFS man, NO. The SS does not publicly talk about anything they do, especially to protect the POTUS.

But now you thik they should talk about something because YOU want to know

Hell, if the J6 commission released the testimony of the SS the collective heads of the right wing in this country would assplode in rage claiming they were anti american and you know it

 

The protection of the POTUS has nothing to do with what happened inside that vehicle on 1/6. No one is asking them to reveal methods of protection.

 

Now HERE is the best argument against the Suburban story I've seen so far...

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trumps-girth-prevent-him-actually-200030703.html

Although, did anybody see the video of that bison goring the guy in Yellowstone??.... Large stupid animals can move very quickly if they sense a threat....

 

Exactly, they opened the secret service door NOT THE SS. If it was protected they shouldn't have opened the door on NATIONAL TV. Now the SS wants to respond and for some reason the committee is quuuuiiiiiieeeeeetttttt all of a sudden.

 

And if you dare ask him a question about it you get this response

Really tells you the validity of the claim up front.
doesn't it

 

The SS does not do say ANYTHING publicly because it can reveal methods. That is why the so routinely deny "comment" that nobody even asks anymore

But how can discussing what happened inside the car not reveal methods ?

 

You mean saying whether Trump farted in the SUV would compromise his protection? Seriously.

 

Trying to pin your desperate posting MO on me is sand box mentality but I've never seen anything worthwhile or worthy in any B/S you post ever The purpose of your posts is merely to hide behind weak strawmen and then flame. It's jeunivile low brow activity.

 

The Newsweek story is one quick google, all the rest is current events that I am not in denial over. Think critically, common sense is also dependent on remaining informed and desiminating the info.

 

Ahhh, that Mark Twain....

 

Another off topic rant to try and conceal the fact you can't provide the information requested.
Next

 

Or it was not known when he was interviewed under oath, timeline and knowledge at the time is relevant. So, bring him back and put him on the record.

 

However, the left has this issue of disseminating allot of manufacture information.

 

Still scurrying for an angle? For me this is child's play.

 

Yeah, we know. Its really all you have provided in every thread you infect. Childs play.
But I do appreciate the admission.

 

Now you are deflecting from the actual testimony under oath. Remember, she also testified to some damning first hand testimony. Of course, most can't talk about that.

 

Still digging desperately like one's lifestyle depended on it but actually galloping away from the rest of her first hand testimony? Rhetorical and obvious.

 

They have volunteered to do just that. The January 6th Kangaroo court will not bring them back as it would taint their narrative they are trying to paint. They'd rather stick with the story that Hutchinson heard from a person that heard from a person that Trump attacked a secret service agent. Non-kangaroo courts would not tie their prosecution argument on hearsay!

Secret Service informs committee that agents are willing to testify and dispute the SUV incident

 

Ah... so, as long as you have damning first hand testimony.. that should automatically validate unequivocal refuted second hand testimony... Please tell me you do not represent anyone legally?!

 

We are all still waiting for your provision of this exclusive deposition release to Politico you claimed Engel testified too.
You going to admit that doesn't exist, or provide it.
Or just keep with your childs play (as you call it)

 

So that helps your claim how? Do you support the SS testifying on National TV as they are offering?

 

Your not paying attention

Where people are sitting, how many are in the car, the structure of the car...ALL of those are methods.......If they get discussed, which they will !

 

So when the specific agent(s) testify and not a statement from the general office of the SS, you'll have a real talking point. Until then, wait for better talking points.

You keep the using the same tired rabbit to tempt a chase; that lifestyle must be very spartan but still enough to be desperate.

You are not using your noggin', the cat's out of the bag since she's given a **** ton of damning first hand testimony AS WELL which you are without talking points to deal with so basically can't handle.

 

Probably more so then you. For instance here is but one example I can find on the Internet regarding the Presidential motorcade.

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/4518/the-fascinating-anatomy-of-the-presidential-motorcade

Please consider that you simply don't know what you're talking about. The information that Hutchison revealed (even though hearsay) reveals absolutely no sensitive info that is a National security matter. If it was, do you really think the Committee would allow her to publicly disclose it?