Secret Service agents willing to testify that Trump didn't lunge at steering wheel

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by apexofpurple, Jun 28, 2022.

  1. Bearack

    Bearack Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2011
    Messages:
    7,870
    Likes Received:
    7,452
    Trophy Points:
    113
    FFS... Then call them up in the hearings... They are willing and merely need to be subpoenaed and placed under oath. Not allowing them to do so merely destroys any credibility Hutchinson's testimony might have had. And I can nearly guarantee the January 6th kangaroo court will not subpoena them... It would merely throw mud in their own face. I
     
    Ddyad likes this.
  2. grapeape

    grapeape Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2015
    Messages:
    17,041
    Likes Received:
    9,441
    Trophy Points:
    113
    And how many people are in each car ? WHO is in each car? What is the purpose of that vehicle in the overall motorcade ?

    ALL of those questions could/would be asked in a public deposition...

    But hey, you keep being a simpleton.....
     
  3. Ddyad

    Ddyad Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2015
    Messages:
    53,468
    Likes Received:
    25,436
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The elements of a fair hearing and due process are not required for political show trials and witch hunts. Just ask and DP pol or RINO.
     
    roorooroo and Bearack like this.
  4. bx4

    bx4 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2016
    Messages:
    15,258
    Likes Received:
    12,601
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Why would you think that? Mueller said the evidence didn’t support that conclusion.
     
    Ddyad likes this.
  5. Overitall

    Overitall Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2021
    Messages:
    12,210
    Likes Received:
    11,567
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You're really not very good at critical thinking. Nothing you said here makes sense.
     
    roorooroo likes this.
  6. JET3534

    JET3534 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2014
    Messages:
    13,363
    Likes Received:
    11,538
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I don't think they really believe it.
     
    Moolk and Ddyad like this.
  7. grapeape

    grapeape Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2015
    Messages:
    17,041
    Likes Received:
    9,441
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Thanks for proving my point ;)
     
  8. Hey Now

    Hey Now Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2021
    Messages:
    17,667
    Likes Received:
    14,085
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You are arguing a straw man angle; that's going to happen and if they lie under oath (a crime) and it can be proven they will either need a pardon or will see the inside of a cell.
     
  9. hawgsalot

    hawgsalot Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2017
    Messages:
    10,545
    Likes Received:
    9,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    LOL so you positioned that the SS was interviewed and somehow that makes her testimony valid, now you pivoting, running and throwing ignorant jabs like you do in every thread, when we show the flaw of your noggin. Got it.... My question is simple to you, do you support the SS testifying on national TV specifically speaking to her testimony?
     
    Last edited: Jun 30, 2022
    roorooroo and JET3534 like this.
  10. hawgsalot

    hawgsalot Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2017
    Messages:
    10,545
    Likes Received:
    9,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Have you never watched a National Security hearing. That's classified is how they answer, and everybody on that committee would be informed what they couldn't ask nor answer. Come on man don't dumb down the simple.
     
    glitch likes this.
  11. Hey Now

    Hey Now Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2021
    Messages:
    17,667
    Likes Received:
    14,085
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Do some research instead of beating a dead horse of desperation; I don't post disingenuously, I clearly make my position known given the info I can find from my eyes and research, no talking points. So, let's get the agent under oath about this minor second hand info. It's not rocket science.
     
  12. grapeape

    grapeape Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2015
    Messages:
    17,041
    Likes Received:
    9,441
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Again, then what your saying is that they cannot ask the questions they need to ask, and the SS could not answer what they didnt want to, yet you think we will get the truth ?

    THAT is why they get deposed in private ;)
     
  13. Bearack

    Bearack Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2011
    Messages:
    7,870
    Likes Received:
    7,452
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Please do tell (this should be interesting) how I am arguing a straw man angle here by vocally advocating for them to be heard... UNDER OATH?


    And based upon your response, it appears you've already made your mind up about their testimony.
     
  14. Hey Now

    Hey Now Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2021
    Messages:
    17,667
    Likes Received:
    14,085
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Go back and read the interactions after you quoted me. My position and posts have not changed and you keep deflecting to some comfort corner of an alternate reality.
     
  15. fullmetaljack

    fullmetaljack Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2017
    Messages:
    8,133
    Likes Received:
    6,916
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Please rephrase, this time in English (or American).
     
  16. fullmetaljack

    fullmetaljack Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2017
    Messages:
    8,133
    Likes Received:
    6,916
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The answer I come up with is they don’t want to admit they were taken in by a mediocre con man.
     
    bigfella likes this.
  17. Bearack

    Bearack Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2011
    Messages:
    7,870
    Likes Received:
    7,452
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The only successful thing you have accomplished here is talking in circles. Whittling down your lack of responses, the only thing I might surmise of your position is that you actually agree with me that the SS agents should be subpoenaed, placed under oath and testify to what they say actually transpired.... Not hearsay.. Good.. glad we finally agree.
     
  18. Hey Now

    Hey Now Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2021
    Messages:
    17,667
    Likes Received:
    14,085
    Trophy Points:
    113
    And, there we have it, claiming nonsense^^ to use as as some desperate straw man or you simply don't read English well. It was bound to surface when you simply can't counter truth and facts in the public domain because the talking points are mired in such a narrow focus ignoring everything else MORE RELEVANT & DAMNING she said UNDER OATH.
     
    Last edited: Jun 30, 2022
  19. Bearack

    Bearack Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2011
    Messages:
    7,870
    Likes Received:
    7,452
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Again talking in circles. See, it's you that has a hard time sticking with the topic at hand, considering we have been... and have not deviated... from the topic of Hutchinson hearsay testimony and that the SS is willing to testify, under oath, that her testimony is inaccurate. And the reason you continue to deflect is because your "MORE RELEVANT & DAMNING" testimony becomes tainted as a portion of it will be proven emphatically wrong. You claim that we are mired in such narrow focus, ignoring everything else, however by your own omission are doing the very thing you accuse by ignoring the SS testimony and focusing on your so called "MORE RELEVANT & DAMNING" testimony.
     
    roorooroo likes this.
  20. Hollyhood

    Hollyhood Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2020
    Messages:
    1,592
    Likes Received:
    1,730
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Last edited: Jun 30, 2022
    roorooroo, glitch and Moolk like this.
  21. Condor060

    Condor060 Banned Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2018
    Messages:
    20,939
    Likes Received:
    15,446
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    As anything you post is a rabbit chase if anyone ask you to verify anything.
    Same ole same ole
     
    roorooroo likes this.
  22. Hollyhood

    Hollyhood Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2020
    Messages:
    1,592
    Likes Received:
    1,730
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Yeah. So the Democrats knowingly posited false evidence by letting this disgruntled ex-employee fabricate easily falsifiable states in attempt to provide disinformation to the public. It's very clearly hearsay and hearsay-upon-hearsay evidence. During the entire testimony, Liz Cheney is leading the witness who is repeated the question as a statement as opposed to saying 'yes' or 'no' to indirect questions. She is taking her cues from participants off-camera, and verdicts have been overturned from such conduct. This is a classic case of coaching the witness, and it was absolutely disgusting. Ground for disbarment.

    BTW... She's actually just pissed that Trump didn't hire her to work for him at Mar A Lago.
     
    roorooroo, mngam and Moolk like this.
  23. Hey Now

    Hey Now Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2021
    Messages:
    17,667
    Likes Received:
    14,085
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You lost the discussion but are too lazy to fall. Sorry but you are also now grasping for straws since your position is limited by lack of knowledge.
    And your debate skills or the complete lack of, keep you reaching for a life line.
     
  24. Condor060

    Condor060 Banned Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2018
    Messages:
    20,939
    Likes Received:
    15,446
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Seems you have the same answers to every post. lol
     
  25. glitch

    glitch Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2006
    Messages:
    13,607
    Likes Received:
    2,167
    Trophy Points:
    113
    And to allow that kind of testimony into a "trial" where they are trying to bring down the previous prez seems pretty despicable. Apparently they didn't even bother asking any of those present to try and confirm her story. This testimony wouldn't be allowed in a small-claims court and they're broadcasting this slander to the world, apparently at the direction of their hollywood producer who is to trying to repackage this thing into quite the fable.
     
    roorooroo likes this.

Share This Page