SAMUEL ALITO’S ANTIABORTION INSPIRATION: A 17TH-CENTURY JURIST WHO SUPPORTED MARITAL

Well anything that violates what the Constitution says is definitely unconstitutional that's what that means.

When the federal government took something that wasn't delegated to them in the Constitution and decided that it's theirs to delegate debts is clear I cut a violation of the 10th amendment is one can find an example of.

 

Fake News. When an unelected body properly removes themselves and instructs a Free People to rely on their Elected Representatives, it's the opposite of fascism.

Roe “exalts judges at the expense of the People from whom they derive their authority.” The Court’s majority have now handed the right to decide back to the voters."

 

We had freedom of the individual and you took it away.

That's fascism. Deal with it.

 

Fake News. I did nothing. If your elected representatives fashion law that illegitimately encroaches on your liberty you need to either vote them out, recall them or haul them into court. That is how our Liberal Constitutional Democracy works, though it takes a certain level of maturity that some on the Left seem to lack in preference for authoritarian decrees by the unelected.

 

Sorry, but the 10th does not strip a citizen's right to privacy and personal autonomy as guaranteed by the 4th.

This was an unconstitutional decision by activist conservatives on the court. Period.

 

The supreme Court didn't repeal the fourth amendment repealed which was the acted in 1973.

It was never right that you can have an abortion.

No it wasn't. They repealed a court ruling not the Fourth amendment.

 

I'll give you the same reply I provided on a related thread:

Is the 4th Amendment constitutional? Because those are the rights being stripped from women, as well as protection from the states violating those rights in accordance with Section 1 of the 14th Amendment.

Go ahead, look those up ... I'll wait for ya. Then come back and read the actual text of Roe v Wade:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/410/113

 

It didn't touch the Fourth amendment.

The supreme Court ruled that there's no constitutional right to abortion. Not anything at all about the 4th amendment.

So your question is really rather bizarre.

 

Just because I feel like no one has said it….
To the woman who is pro-life,
You are loved beyond measure
To the woman who is pro-choice,
You are loved beyond measure.
To the woman who is on the fence,
You are loved beyond measure.
To the woman who is heart broken from being told she is unable to have children.
You are loved and created for a purpose.
To the woman who is excitingly pregnant with her fifth child even though her family says it’s “irresponsible”
You are loved and created for a purpose.
To the woman who found out the child inside of her would cost her her life and chose to abort,
You are loved and created for a purpose
To the woman who’s world has been turned upside down when her child’s heart stopped beating inside her womb,
There is endless unconditioned love for you
To the woman who is on the bathroom floor looking at two pink lines after running from their abusive partner.
There is endless unconditional love for you.
To the woman who has to make an impossible decision when she was told her child was not forming properly and was in extreme pain.
There is endless unconditional love for you.
To the woman who’s abortion haunts her everyday,
There is grace and incredible love for you.
To the woman who was raped and found out she was pregnant and decided to not carry the child.
There is grace and incredible love for you.
To all of the woman who had to make a choice to bring life into the world or to end it and to the ones who were not given a choice. I hope you know that His grace and love is endless for you.
Regardless if people say your choice was “right” or “wrong” and with all the hatefulness on both sides. I hope you know that you are loved by the savior of the world. He understands your pain/grief/worry/doubt/ and every other thing you had to go through. And you are priceless and endlessly loved in his eyes. And mine. (I apologize for those who told you different)
You are loved beyond measure.

 

9th

 

RBG stated that Roe v Wade was overreach despite the fact that she personally supported abortion. At the time it was passed many states had laws on the books that outlawed abortion over 93 years. RBG stated that Roe made abortion controversial by attacking Federalism rather than attacking the Texas law. Biden went a step further by attacking religious freedom when he threw the Hyde Amendment compromise in the dumpster. Northam went even further when he articulated the Democrat platform that applied Roe to live born babies.

Jackson represents the lowest purely political standard.

 

The SC reversed what was a terrible decision by any standard. At the time of her confirmation, even Ruth Bader Ginsberg said Roe was the wrong decision. The SC should have struck down the Texas law and allowed states and localities exert a power that was not enumerated in the Constitution.

 

Roe was an overreach by the Federal government per the 10th Amendment. It exerted powers that were not enumerated. Those powers belong to the states, localities and people. The 9th Amendment states that the rights of the people may extend beyond those enumerated explicitly. Roe was bad law ,,, or not law a all ,,, foisted on the country by radicals.