Democrat's Continued Assault On Whites

If that was a typo then ima unicorn. You likely tell that to all your minions but when you're corrected by a student of history and geography then you want to claim typo.

Not flying.

 

A typo is a typo is a typo. Care to debate about what I said if the word was America instead of the planet? Or, would you rather avoid that and just talk about typos?

 

I'm jus saying, that was a major typo, to the point where you prolly actually believed it on some major misinformation type shii

 

I have shown you before why this is a disingenuous argument to put forth. I'll do it again.

It is a fact that blacks vote Democrat anywhere between 80-98 percent of the time as the vast majority of them prefer the Democratic Party. Very few blacks, relatively speaking, are in the Republican Party. Out of 40 million some odd black people living in the US I'd guess maybe around 1 million are Republican. And I'm probably being very generous with that number which is based on a guess based on the 80-98 percent voting record.

Additionally, the vast majority of blacks live in cities. Urban areas tend to be more affiliated with the Democratic Party. So, even if a Black Republican wanted to run for office, they don't stand a chance of being elected, simply because they live in a city which is predominately composed of Democrats.

Considering this it is disingenuous to assert that the Republican Party is racist simply because they are no longer able to field as many black people in politics as they once did.

However, I believe this is changing. More and more black people are becoming disenfranchised of the Democratic Party. I'm seeing more and more black people running for various offices this year under the Republican Party than in previous years.

 

Except its not.

 

Good argument. Not. You can't even dispute what I said. All you can do is deny a very tiny portion of what I said. And that denial is ignoring what the rest of the post said just to make the denial.

 

A typo is a typo is a typo. I freely admit that was a major typo. I often times type fast as this is not so important to me that I take a lot of time on it. I'm sorry for using the wrong word and I appreciate the fact that if the word American is used instead of the word planet, then you must agree with me and don't have a debate on what I said. Obviously, I know that whites don't make up the majority of the planet.

 

She needs medical care. Here’s an idea…how about not thinking you know our situation. K?

 

You’re taking liberties with your definition of being born with a silver spoon.

 

I think you're mischaracterizing his views.

I tell ya ... you MAGA rightwingers have an agenda that looks more and more like conclusions seeking premises.

 

I'm not your teacher. I don't even like the term "teaching" as it is too often synonymous with preaching.

I wasn't working for you.

 

She is a "her" and I am not a republican. Did you ever consider that someone might just be an individual instead to rushing to lump people in with a group?

 

...and those who share her beliefs.

 

What decision is that?

 

It just means wealthy/connected parents.

 

She was not allowed to drink from certain drinking fountains. She was not allowed into many bathrooms. She was not allowed into many businesses.
She was not allowed into certain schools under any circumstance.

This supposed wife got into the school she wanted.
And AA wasn't just about skin color. Females got a preference also, because they have been discriminated against.
Which makes the claim that a wife had to wait a year to get in all the more unlikely.

 

What? Only voters in her district can vote for her. That's one district out of 435.

 

You need to go all of the way back to post #1. You must have forgotten what the thread was about.

 

The OP talks about leaving whites behind.

But, whites aren't being left behind.

So, my question stands.

 

Point is that making someone wait longer because of their skin color is discriminatory, racially discriminatory. How you don't realize that I have no idea.

Its not unlikely at all. Happens all the time. Colleges have outright admitted to it. Indeed check out Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College. In it a court ruled that it was OK for colleges/universities to consider race in their application process. Ironically its not white people being impacted the most, its a minority group...Asians.

 

If it was truly discrimination, she could never attend that college. If it was due to AA numbers being met, then it was a big inconvenience to have to wait 1 yr.
But this wife is a woman and is one of the people the AA was written for.

 

You spout a lot of rightwing BS.

Okay, you're a rightwinger who doesn't like Trump.

 

He couldn't get out much if he thinks white folks are a majority of the planet's people.

Every time I see stuff like that I think to myself about schools not educating kids.

 

My parents weren’t wealthy which was my point.

 

Bullcrap. You're making excuses to justify discrimination. You can't fix discrimination with more discrimination. What is so hard to understand about that?

If a teacher put a white kid in the front of the line, and the black kid in the back...is that discrimination? Yes or no.

Then reverse it.

If a teacher put a black kid in front of the line, and the white kid in the back...is that discrimination? Yes or no.

There is only one answer to both of those questions. Anything else is discrimination.