So why has Trump not taken this before a judge? I mean that is the correct pathway for redress. I know he failed on 59 other cases but if there is something to this then……
Because judges do not want to get involved in elections. The American voters will decide in November. When democrats have to manufacture even more votes they will begin to lose.....bigly.
I did search for details but couldn't find anything that offered any more factual detail beyond repeating the statement from this initial list. Given these are cases that have only been referred for prosecution, such details may well not be publicly available yet but if you're so certain that is the case, you should be able to at least point us in the right direction.
It's like anything else... if the government is behind the fraud - they aren't about to indict themselves. It's called corruption. Trump was an outsider who couldn't be counted on to toe the company line. Biden on the hand is a crook through and through. The Establishment wants corrupt people in office. If you don't understand that, then you have no idea how the game is played.
I always do this. Yet a number of posters either make it up as they go, or misconstrue well-reported facts to fit the RW narratives. I'm sure that they're already posted their nonsensical narratives about the FBI carrying out a search warrant.
Do you really believe that Georgia's election committee is going to say "yup, we dropped the ball"? The fact is, this was a close election no matter how the left tries to phrase. If the left had lost and Trump won, they would STILL be rioting in the streets. I am asking for election integrity, something I think is paramount and fundamental to our Republic. Something we know doesn't exist beyond "close enough!" from the left.
No wonder the claims of fraud are so minuscule, the left fails to call it that when their guys wins. You all act surprised I hold this opinion of distrust? 80% of the country doens't trust it. America's faith in the integrity of the election system remains shaken by the events of Jan. 6, with only 20% of the public saying it's very confident about the system, a new ABC/Ipsos poll finds. This is a significant drop from 37% in an ABC News/Washington Post poll conducted in the days after the insurrection last year. The lack of strong confidence in the country's ability to conduct an honest election crosses partisan lines. https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/americans-faith-election-integrity-drops-poll/story?id=82069876
I get to have doubts in my perception of the integrity of the elections. 80% of Americans do. Only the hard left partisans with the outcome desired pretend everything is trustworthy. I don't need to validate my skepticism to you or anybody else. The majority of Americans are skeptical. You don't have to like that, but it is what it is.
The Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank, has looked into voter fraud and has identified only 1,371 instances over the last 40 years. In all states. In all elections. Not just presidential. Congress, senate, state, local. If you can prove more fraud than a conservative think tank that is specifically concerned about this issue and try to find it … go for it.
And I get to have my doubts on the veracity and mendacity of US politicians - does not mean I should keep griping about it
While you are on accusations. https://www.reuters.com/world/us/ex...general-candidate-involved-voting-2022-08-07/ Keep digging. !!!
They are only capable of reporting on fraud that the government found. As if the government is capable of funding it, especially with nonstop efforts by the left to remove safe guards to protect the election. Your argument is like saying nobody exceeds the speed limit after getting rid of all the police. Well! No citations were issued!
No, you're talking about a solution in search of a problem. What you're complaining about didn't happen. You say it was a "close" election? (shrug) ok.......but the winner won and the loser lost. The right lost and are STILL complaining about it with no evidence to back up their whining. Nothing other than a lot of "what if's" and "but.....but....but".
Election deniers take center stage at CPAC All you guys have the terminology backward. The people that deny anything was wrong or untoward or fraudulent with the 2020 election should be called the "deniers."
You don't remember the clamor from Democrats about stolen elections, Russian interference with voting machines, and illegitimate presidents in 2016??? Really??
Except we don't call them that. And unfortunately for you, Biden was elected fair and square, with a comfortable majority, so he is the legitimate president and Trump has never been able to demonstrate in court that the election stole from him.
There was not the "clamor" that there should've been even though there's ample evidence of the Russians attacking the 2016 Presidential elections. The Mueller Report outlines Russian actions and their numerous contacts with the Trump campaign. In contrast, Trump and his idiot kook followers make claims about the 2020 election even though it's patently BS. The Orange Stain kept bringing frivolous suits, losing over 60 cases, and then he invited and exhorted nutjobs and freaks to attack the Capitol while the Congress was trying to certify the election of Joe Biden. And the Orange Freak is STILL bilking his moronic sheep out of $ with his BS shtick! Now THAT'S clamor. If you gave a damn about this country, the Orange Criminal's conduct should alarm you, but no, another country interfering in our election on behalf of the Orange Lunatic is "meh" to you. Illogical and insane.
Again and again we come back to “where is your proof? You can claim the moon is made of green cheese but that does not make it so