Mar-a-lago Judge Warrant

The actual Warrant for the raid, on Mar-a-lago, was signed by the same judge, that once represented Jeffrey Epstien's side in the famous underage human sex trafficking scandal.

That should tell you a lot about how corrupt the FBI, DOJ, and Liberal Politicians are, in this whole thing.

 

Nobody should be above the law. not you, not me, not Donald Trump, not the FBI, the DOJ, or the Democrat Politicians.

Unfortunately, there is a two tier justice system in America.

Why did Democrat Politicians wait, until a couple of months before the midterm elections, and so long after Trump was out of office, to try and find these records?

 

Only a “judge” like that would have approved such an unconstitutionally broad general warrant. Every document generated by the President from Jan 20, 2017 to Jan 20, 2021 for instance…

 

yep. Corrupt helps the corrupt. Evil sticks with evil.

 

Because Trump has rights and Democrats respect rights, even when their opponents don't.

 

The entirety of Trump's career illustrates that better than anything.

 

Democrat voters respect rights, maybe. Their politicians? now that's just funny. I'm glad you started my day out with a good laugh.

Thank you. Everyone should start their day out being happy.

 

were you just going to ignore the whole jeffrey epstein thing, and the judge that agrees with that same morality, of underage human sex trafficking or what?

 

Lawyers represent all sorts of people. That is their job. It does it make them the same as those people. Doctors treat all sorts of scum because it is their job. Same with lawyers.

 

<Mod Edit> That a lawyer represents a bank robber does not mean he agrees with bank robbery. Why am I even posting this simple stuff?

 

So you think defense lawyers agree with the crimes their clients are accused of? You DO understand how our legal system works, right?

 

Yes. Judges and lawyers are supposed to see that everyone gets the same rights no matter what they are accused of The judge saw that Epstein got the same right to a vigorous defense that you would be entitled to in that circumstance.

Do you prefer lynch law over our American system? Perhaps you would be happier in Afghanistan.

 

<Mod Edit>
Doctors take an oath of morality, to help anyone, no matter how evil they think the person is. They're not obligated to do so, threw legal aspect, but do so because of their morality oath.

Where as most lawyers, that aren't state appointed, can actually turn down someone's case, if they chose too. duh?
there is no oath of morality with them, nor are they obligated to anyone, either. even if they think someone is evil, sick, and immoral, and even guilty, they may represent them, and they do so, for the money, and power of attention.

<Rule 2/3>

 

Everybody understands that, at least those who have hired and socialized with lawyers for decades.

The point here counselor, is that the magistrate SHOULD HAVE recused himself. Believe it or not, some lawyers do live within a code of ethics. FWIW, the rules demand a code of ethics, and in this case recusal.

Related, the crooked bastard who sentenced Simone Gold to 60 days in federal prison SHOULD HAVE recused himself, as the two went to law school together and socialized and dated.

 

Can I assume you had an equal outrage when Trump appointed Acosta to the position of Labor Secretary?

 

Trump doesn't have near the street credibility many attribute to him. He hired Barr, Milley, Acosta and a variety of other Deep State Players into his administration.

He wisely and correctly removed the US from WHO, and then months later led the way to Operation Warp Speed.

 

I have not been following that discussion. So...in a nut shell....please tell me why the Magistrate should have stood aside?

 

.[/QUOTE]

do you believe that underaged human sex trafficking is moral and ok to do?

 

do you believe that underaged human sex trafficking is moral and ok to do?[/QUOTE]

Are you serious?

 

We should not have ignored the Epstein thing ... we could have avoided all this.

 

do you believe that underaged human sex trafficking is moral and ok to do?

[/QUOTE]

Guilt by association? Well, OK, if that's what you want ...

 

No need for all that when you can keep things at home

 

Are you serious?[/QUOTE]

seriously serious.

Any time, jeffrey epstien is brought up, most democrats on here, in other forums don't directly give a simple answer, to a simple question.

They don't, because they know that jeffrey epstien was a liberal donor, and very sick, immoral, and corrupt, and many liberal democrat American Politicians went to his underage sex island. People like bill clinton.

So, it would expose immoral and sick how many of them truly are. so, yes, it is a serious question.

It's called, blindly following ones party, and sticking up for their politicians no matter what immoral acts they do!!!

 

.

 

seriously serious.

Any time, jeffrey epstien is brought up, most democrats on here, in other forums don't directly give a simple answer, to a simple question.

They don't, because they know that jeffrey epstien was a liberal donor, and very sick, immoral, and corrupt, and many liberal democrat American Politicians went to his underage sex island. People like bill clinton.

So, it would expose immoral and sick how many of them truly are. so, yes, it is a serious question.

It's called, blindly following ones party, and sticking up for their politicians no matter what immoral acts they do!!![/QUOTE]

Yep like you guys and trump.