To a layman who has terminal confirmation bias perhaps! Complete garbage based on the Aulis author having not the slightest clue about geology! See batshit post batshit. The Apollo samples differed from one mission to the next. It would be staggering if different areas of the Moon, bombarded by different meteorites over billions of years had the same soil characteristics! The Russian samples were entirely soil samples. They may well be different from Apollo soils from the various missions, but several things they will not differ about. None of them have any terrestrial weathering properties, all of them have considerable impregnation with solar isotopes and predominantly they are composed of very sharp and jagged tiny fragments. No it won't, there is no hoax evidence only gullible and poorly informed opinions that have been soundly debunked. You don't ever do any "thinking about", you consign all batshit into an "already proven no matter what" section and everything explaining it and showing it why it is nonsense in the "completely ignored/disregarded" section!
I just came across something worth posting. This is another reason the Russians aren't snitching on NASA now. https://www.aulis.com/moonbase2017.htm (excerpt) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ‘[T]he United States has lacked the domestic capability to transport crew to and from the International Space Station (ISS or Station), and instead has relied on the Russian Federal Space Agency (Roscosmos). Between 2006 and 2018, NASA will pay Roscosmos approximately $3.4 billion to ferry 64 NASA and partner astronauts to and from the ISS in its Soyuz spacecraft’. (Inspector General, 2016, p.1) At prices ranging now up to $80 million for each round trip, it is not implausible to conclude that the Russians are satisfied to be quietly supportive of the Apollo myth. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nothing you ever dump on this forum falls into that category. Ludicrous see batshit post batshit. And what do you mean "another reason"? There is nothing to "snitch on" and were there such evidence, the Soviets could utterly destroy US credibility.
The Apollo samples differed from one mission to the next. It would be staggering if different areas of the Moon, bombarded by different meteorites over billions of years had the same soil characteristics! The Russian samples were entirely soil samples. They may well be different from Apollo soils from the various missions, but several things they will not differ about. None of them have any terrestrial weathering properties, all of them have considerable impregnation with solar isotopes and predominantly they are composed of very sharp and jagged tiny fragments. What kind of person does this "post batshit and ignore replies" over and over again ad nauseum? It goes way beyond delusion and Dunning Kruger. Do you actually have any integrity at all?
Has anyone compared video from modern times drone landings to those original landings regarding terrain similarities?
(from post #532) http://www.politicalforum.com/index...anding-is-fake.553296/page-22#post-1073703544 Here's something I'd forgotten about. I lived in south Florida when the Apollo 17 rocket was launched at night. I went to the beach to see it. There were thousands of people there. The rocket went up and then curved to the east. It stayed on an easterly course until it was out of sight. This is not consistent with the scenario of their just skirtining the edge of the belts. It's consistent with their going right through the middle of the belts. I should have remembered this.
Not possible, but these landing videos compared to terrain mapping are 100% accurate: There is one of these for all the landings. It is one of the most absurd claims that this is a model. The detail from high up just keeps getting more and more defined as they descend. To do this, the model would have to resolve 2-3 metre craters from thousands of feet - that would be Moon sized!
Bullshit. Anything to bump an older thread. You see, you could quite easily have put this in any number of the other threads, but you chose to do this because you wanted your crap at the top of the heap! Your personal testimony is irrelevant, since the whole thing is recorded. Exactly as it should. It goes without saying that orbital mechanics is also on your no-clue-whatsoever list. It is exactly consistent with it. It is the exact trajectory that proves it. perhaps you think going East from a latitude just shy of 30 degrees North makes them do a giant circle on the 30th parallel!? Is that really what you think? Apollo 17 groundtrack (honeysucklecreek.net) No. You are entirely clueless about everything it seems. Even the dead simple search on the internet for the orbital path for Apollo 17! No, you should have stayed off the internet and done something useful with your day. You are a forum troll who knows nothing about any subject you post on, you fail to respond to 90% of the content posted. You should keep in mind that you have no relevant knowledge and seek out a new "hobby".
I chose it because it had the last post post that maintained the Apollo craft skirted around the belts and I wanted to talk about it on the same thread that had that discussion. You're still simply believing what you read in the mainstream. What this guy puts forward sounds plausible. "Were The Photographs Of The Lunar Landings Taken On Earth?" Full Video Interview (1:00:15 time mark) Anyway, since the anomalies* have already proven that the missions were faked, we know they neither went through, nor skirted around the belts. * http://www.politicalforum.com/index...anding-is-fake.553296/page-22#post-1073703706
Pathetic spam. You just made a claim that was bullshit and ignored my reply. You have zero integrity, you are not here to debate, you are here to troll. Debunking The Apollo Moon Hoax (debunking-a-moron.blogspot.com) 11. Never mind that - look over here: When this hopeless individual has exhausted his inept repertoire of responses comes his most used spam. He resorts to spamming his wall of crap and ignoring the main issue! "Anyway, there's a ton of proof that the missions were faked and zero proof that they were real." "Anyway, the hoax has already been proven by the anomalies I pointed out in post #xx so the "insert evidence" issue isn't about whether they faked it. It's about how they faked it." What a sad, sad liar this person is. They have been humiliated completely on dozens of subjects, thousands of times on Apollo, yet they spew this cut and paste hogwash almost every time.
I just found this video. I've only seen about ten minutes of it but I'm posting it anyway. "SMOKE AND MIRRORS" WITH RESTORED COMMENTARY, COMPLETE VIDEO!
See batshit post batshit. What a contemptible troll you are. You post your clueless claim about Apollo 17 launch and then run away when it is explained to you, then instead of acknowledging your ignorance you divert with an idiotic video you just bunkered upon.
I didn't run away. Here's my response. (from post #584) This is a pretty lame response. Why don't you say why it's all wrong if you think it's all wrong?
This is a pretty lame response. Why don't you say explain in your own words why your idiotic guy is plausible. As for your latest repackaged junk, it's batshit, it's nearly 3 hours of regurgitated stupidity so I can see why you fall for it. We have garbage about the speed of the film doubled which contradicts YOU and disproven in dozens and dozens of videos that you are afraid to answer. We have the garbage about straight lines where the "backdrop" begins. Same thing happens on distant horizons on Earth. We have the utterly ludicrous claim about simulators with the large Moon that do not address how it is even possible to resolve a 2-3m crater whilst mimicking the surface at high altitude. It is impossible without a massive simulator, the size of the damn Moon! I could go on, but you lack the logic, objectivity, honesty, critical thinking and motive to debate honestly. Since you only watched 10 minutes it is highly dishonest to expect me to go through your junk for you.
This video is about a guy who supposedly witnessed the faking of the moon missions and told his son about it on his deathbed. MOON LANDING HOAX CONFESSION
He was visited by men in ‘black suits’ and told to stop what he was doing or his family might disappear. People broke into his house and the police visited him and he didn’t say anything about the moon landings because he was being tested by the men in the black suits. That sounds a bit far fetched. Very convenient that the recording of his father’s deathbed confession was destroyed in a fire of unknown origin. His house was raided and his computer taken — but no record of this. The man claimed that his father, Cyrus Eugene Akers, was a military police officer who, in 1968, was stationed at Cannon Air Force Base in New Mexico. The man in the video claimed to be Gene Gilmore, with the given name of Eugene Akers. He didn’t give any proof of his identity nor did he explain why he changed his birth name. The video was made public after his death on February 13th, 2022 but nobody can confirm that a man called Gene Gilmore died on that day. Too many holes. And once again, if the government had actually set up a fake recording studio, hundreds would have been involved. So, why is one man with a fake name and a really questionable story to be believed? Thousand and thousands of people were involved in the moon landing, yet all of them remained silent. Doesn’t make sense. Sorry Scott another failure on your part. You can read about it at the following link — https://leadstories.com/hoax-alert/...n-video-does-not-prove-moon-landing-hoax.html Video —>
I'd like to hear the pro-Apollo camp's explanation for this. Someone on Earth tells Neil Armstrong to talk at the 34:30 time mark of this video. A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon - MM2 https://www.bing.com/videos/search?...75B799A3AA9A3AB9D68275B799A3AA9A3AB&FORM=VIRE
There is something seriously wrong with you if you can't remember where this has been addressed countless times! This is truly pathetic spam and one of the most idiotic of claims from the proven liar Bart Sibrel. It's Aldrin responding for starters! 1. Who says that noise is a human voice, let alone a word - "talk". The liar Sibrel says. Sounds like the word "tufff". 2. Who automatically believes this batshit? Gullible people seeking confirmation bias. 3. Who watches this garbage and fails to understand the deception in play? Gullible people seeking confirmation bias. 4. Who sees the idiotic claim that within this film, that they are filming the Earth through a round window by standing to the back of the cabin? Gullible people seeking confirmation bias. 5. Who can possibly not know that it is impossible to get even a tiny fragment of the Earth in the window in such cases? Gullible people seeking confirmation bias. 6. Who can possibly fail to know from 20 years of debunks that Sibrel the liar deliberately left off footage showing the full Earth being zoomed out of the rectangular window? Gullible people seeking confirmation bias. To summarize, what mad world of supposed fakery does this overdub need to have anything of the sort? It is insanity to suggest that supposed actors reading from a script need to do this crap! We have Duke talking to the crew, loud enough to hear and the suggestion is that some pathetic subterfuge is going on because of a muffled "tuff" sound is made to get them to respond? In your own words, explain exactly the scenario where this would be applicable and necessary? The whole thing was crapped upon years ago: Bart Sibrel's "Talk" (apollohoax.net) "What Sibrel interprets as the word "talk" (and doesn't let anyone tell him differently) is a garble caused by leakage through the intercom diodes. It was a well known problem with the Apollo comm system and it happens only about a thousand times in every mission, including just before the well-known "Houston, we have a problem" transmission. The astronauts' headsets were used for local communications as well as for talking over the radio. They have a switch on their umbilical that switches modes. When it's in intercom mode (the default) sometimes conversation over the intercom leaks across diodes onto the downlink circuit. So what you hear is a noisy, distorted version of whatever the astronaut says over the intercom to his crewmates." I wonder if scott/cosmored/drifty etc. would have the guts to honestly answer this below! Sibrel claims that the astronauts "ingeniously" stood at the back of the craft and filmed the Earth through the round hatch window. This supposedly mimicked the full Earth. To fully understand how moronic this claim actually is, firstly you'd get maybe a quarter of Texas in the window and you would be sweeping past at 17,500mph! Sibrel the liar deliberately left out the middle transmission which showed this: Is it another one of the wall of spam "moot" points? You can't actually answer this honestly. Sibrel also lied about the footage being "leaked" when it was in the freely available VHS/DVD box set at the time! No wonder you believe this lying snake-oil salesman.
Hey Scott/Cosmo! The viewers want to see you wriggle out of the above. You're done. You cannot escape this one, no amount of obfuscation and evasion is making this one go away!
Someone clearly say the word "Talk". Sorry, but this is too clear to obfuscate. Your credibility just took a big hit. I've never paid much attention to the alleged anomaly that Bart Sibrel points out. It always seemed kind of iffy. I've never put that forward as evidence for that reason.
Oh do shutup with your "credibility" horseshit. It's a muffled "tuffft" sound. To summarize, what mad world of supposed fakery does this overdub need to have anything of the sort? It is insanity to suggest that supposed actors reading from a script need to do this crap! We have Duke talking to the crew, loud enough to hear and the suggestion is that some pathetic subterfuge is going on because of a muffled "tuff" sound is made to get them to respond? Irrelevant. The footage shows a distant Earth that matches the Apollo 11 photography, which matches with prevailing and very accurate hurricane data. Right there is impossible to refute evidence. You have no credibility to lower. You only have ignorant denial. Answer the Jump Salute post, I'm interested to see your follow up failure!
(from post #532) Here's something I just came across. MoonFaker: Radiation Reloaded. Start watching at the 17:40: time mark. Jarrah White shows in a book by Frank Borman, who was part of the Apollo 8 crew, that Mr. Borman says that they went through the thickest part of the belts.
Pathetic evasion. Your absolute cowardice in proper debate is obvious to everyone! For a supposed expert on English your absurd inability to read seems obvious. Borman is venting his spleen at van Allen for some reason. He doesn't say they went through the thickest parts, he suggests his radiation reading indicates that the thickest part offered no danger. You seem to have pathetic failures with memory too. Apollo 14 by virtue of unfavourable Earth tilt managed to go through more denser regions snd still were well within safety limits by a considerable margin! To summarize, what mad world of supposed fakery does this overdub need to have anything of the sort? It is insanity to suggest that supposed actors reading from a script need to do this crap! We have Duke talking to the crew, loud enough to hear and the suggestion is that some pathetic subterfuge is going on because of a muffled "tuff" sound is made to get them to respond? Irrelevant. The footage shows a distant Earth that matches the Apollo 11 photography, which matches with prevailing and very accurate hurricane data. Right there is impossible to refute evidence. You have no credibility to lower. You only have ignorant denial. Answer the Jump Salute post, I'm interested to see your follow up failure!
